EEG_EM_New_Technique_TRANSVERSE_FLUX (TF) (Provisional Patent Applied for)

[solarlab]

EE_TFG FUNCTIONAL BLOCK/SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM
For Engineering Development ONLY V0.1 (26 Jan 24 Rev-A)

Attached is a typical EE_TFG functional block/schematic diagram.

There are many ways to implement the required functions so
please consider this approach as an "example" ONLY that provides
somewhat of a complete basic system overview.

Consult the Infinion, and other, data sheets and AEDT results - don't 
rely on the attached information verbatum. 

This is NOT meant as a "Build-to-Print."

Enjoy!

SL 

[kampen]

Thank You Solarlab,
I hope builders and experimenters all over the world have benefited from this.
Quantity counts, thus the technology remains and could be further developed.
Great job indeed.

[ggx9]

Hi solarlab.
In your first post of Dec 20, 2023 9:51pm you stated These devices are very simple and easy to build while requiring no exotic materials, assembly tools 
nor skills. According to the videos it didnt seem to work out to be so simple and easy to build for both the mechanical part of the build and the complexity of the controller. Could you comment on this, please. Have you tried building a simple version yourself?
Many OU machines seem to have COPs <1 when built on a smaller, simpler scale. Do you have any feel for how or if this would apply to a TFM device ?
In the video he mentions an external power supply but no suggestion of OU.

RichardG

[ggx9]

To allow clearance for mechanical parts to rotate there will be two air gaps required (possibly 0.002" to 0.005" each gap). This very small air gap will significantly reduce that 1.0 Tesla number. I believe your formula and illustration is for a solid magnetic circuit with no air gap at all. In my searches it appears that calculating magnetic field strength with an air gap is very difficult and the variables become numerous. It is also very difficult to measure the flux density in a completed machine because the magnetic flux measuring instrument probe requires a larger air gap (maybe 0.0625") so such a test is meaningless for your particular machine (air gap size).
So the only real way to determine the flux density (Tesla's) is to build a machine, measure the output voltage, take all dimensions of the machine, wire length, magnetic circuit length and meters per second and use those numbers to calculate your Tesla's.

[solarlab]

Hi Kampen,

Thanks. It appears the Transverse Flux scheme is ripe for some significant development.

If you review the 2010 Patent by Jacek F. Gieras [from Study On Permanent Magnet Transverse Machine
by Dobzhanskyi Oleksandr - previously attached] the Gieras device fell somewhat short of the claims.

However Oleksandr analyzed the device and, with a few almost simple changes, increased the
performance by somewhere around 70%, to about 2.2 KW with a double armature.

So, in short, we've still got a ways to go; but the concept of replacing the permanent magnets with
electronic controlled electromagnets might have some real merrit.

If we're right it could bring a significant change to the entire game! 

SL