Quote from: Ufopolitics on Jan 06, 2025, 10:43 AMLockridge Device did not have any permanent magnets.

What is its construct this 'thing' that 'retains' the "Residual Magnetism" at the 3.50 mark? What is doing the 'retaining'? (retention of magnetics is a Magnet is it not?)

at the 5.21 mark Bedini speaks of 4 "poles". 2 being for generating and 2 being for the motor.
If these poles were 'coils' energized to give the North and South Poles he describes, how was this polarity determined or INDUCED?

He says it was a 6V output for the heater. Did the Lockridge device use a 'battery' as "Ballast"?

I have a lot of discussions with Joe on these motor/generator designs. Joe liked the 'old' stuff. He particularity liked the original one wire 'electricity' on the really old cars.

The IP of a Neutral Plate between 2 same Poles is the Mechanism to FOCUS the Wave Form Field and then take that Focal Point to anywhere its desired by the 'shape' of the Neutral Plate. The Neutral Plate is like a Magnifying lens but with a variable Field of Focus for the Neutral Centre Field. I would say its not a 'scalar beam' but a Distortion Field. His explanation of putting "2 North Poles together creates a 'scalar' beam"  just isn't understanding what he perceives he sees.

At the 7.42 mark, he demonstrates this 'same pole' combining with what appears to be a ring magnet and a spherical magnet. This clearly IS NOT joining 2 same poles together. The case is split so two same poles dont create that 'spike scalar beam' he believes to be there. Was the original Lockridge Case split into 4 like he says at the 6.20 mark? Would the parts on the bench be reverse engineered or a new engineered device? His reproduction appears as 2 hemispheres not the 4 described earlier as the Lockridge device. Is this correct?  Was it reversed engineered exactly? Could we be looking at something completely 'different'?

at the 8.20 mark am I correct in he's trying to explain the 90 degree interaction of Polarities that cause 'rotation'? 

Can you help me understand some of these queries Ufo?

Quote from: MerLynn on Jan 07, 2025, 09:14 PM

Quote from: Ufopolitics on Jan 06, 2025, 10:43 AMLockridge Device did not have any permanent magnets.

What is its construct this 'thing' that 'retains' the "Residual Magnetism" at the 3.50 mark? What is doing the 'retaining'? (retention of magnetics is a Magnet is it not?)

Hello MerLynn,

No, it is NOT the same, residual magnetism is NOT a FULLY STRUCTURED AND DEFINED MAGNETIC FIELD, as is on a Permanent Magnet.

Residual magnetism are just SCATTERED DOMAIN ALIGNMENTS within ONLY certain portions of the Stator Steel Core, I could even say it is just a PARASITIC, RANDOMLY DISPERSED Magnetism residues.

And at the time a LOAD is added to circuit demanding more magnetic power from the INDUCED, residual magnetism by itself DIES with a SPIKE, IF Stators are not constantly fed power. just because it is weak, -not consistently set-just a parasitic field.

Residual Magnetism or 'Magnetic Reminiscence" (same thing) takes place in ALL Generators up to now. It is used as an advantage to START Generator (or 'prime' in mechanical terms when it refers to hydraulic pumps). However, this Magnetism is NOT permanent, and if you do not use the generator for a period of time, then you will need to "Prime it" (they call it "Flash it") from an external power source.

On newer gen models they added a small permanent magnet (neo) on each Armature Pole (one facing N and other S towards Stators or Fields), where the armature on an AC Generator are the "always on" exciting fields.

On an old type of Dynamo (like the Lockridge is based on) everything related to Exciter-Stators is switched 180 deg. compared to AC Generators, where the Dynamo's spinning Armature is the Generating (Induced) Field, while Stators are the Exciters (Inducing) Field, and are always on.

And these facts explain why the remnant or residual magnetism on Steel Cores which work 24/7 on, with a DC Current making their poles fixed, end up aligning steel domains and leaving always this magnetic residue.

Quote from: MerLynn on Jan 07, 2025, 09:14 PMat the 5.21 mark Bedini speaks of 4 "poles". 2 being for generating and 2 being for the motor.
If these poles were 'coils' energized to give the North and South Poles he describes, how was this polarity determined or INDUCED?

Again, reread about the way old dynamos are structured that I wrote above...the Stators on a Dynamo are not the "induced" BUT the Inductors, the exciters, and they are always on...no reversing, not on/off...no pulses, straight DC Currents 100%.
On Lockridge, yes, there are 4 Stators, however, they are not mounted "symmetrically" on the housing...seen the picture below?...is at the beginning of this Topic:


And this way of replicating the building of the original German Device, I believe is what "throws out" completely to Bedini and Lindemann...on video, Bedini keeps drawing the Lockridge Device with Symmetrical Stators as "any" motor or generator...:

However, Bedini aligns stators differently than a common Motor or Generator have, as shown on image above, the typical Motor and Generator have an N/S/N/S arrangement, which results in North facing South on every step of rotation. So Bedini draws it here as N/N/S/S, and when you do that, you are just having a larger North and a larger South by setting side by side two norths and two souths...and ends up on a typical N/S TWO POLES instead of Four...but again, that is conceiving it in "On Symmetry" as he draws it on the board.

In reality, there is a GAP between ALL Four Stators as shown on first image...so, Stators NEVER "face" at 180 nor 90 deg each other's Poles, but in an Angular which is not 180 nor 90 degrees.

Quote from: MerLynn on Jan 07, 2025, 09:14 PMHe says it was a 6V output for the heater. Did the Lockridge device use a 'battery' as "Ballast"?

The Lockridge Device had besides the full Dynamo Machine Assembly, Two extra Components:

1- An INDUCTOR: a Triple Coil, Trifilar wound Inductor wrapped around the outer steel casing, projecting its poles towards the Dynamo's Caps...which in my opinion did not interfere with all the inner Interacting Fields between Armature and Stators.
2- A CAPACITOR: Also had around 30 ft of Copper sheet wrapped in between an insulation sheet (butcher wax paper on the case) cap around the steel casing.

And here, speculating, I believe these Two Components were the LC Tank Circuit which acted as you said, as a "ballast" or a capacitive-inductive type of switchable 'battery'...as it is also in charge to set the timing between the interactions of Motor and Generator Functions, like; say when cap fully charges by dynamo's generating side it will discharge at the motoring brushes (which are after it passes the generating cycle according to rotation sense) and then it repeats itself on cycles. Meaning, Generator keep charging and discharging into motor brushes creating a rotation at the very specific timing that armature is being reversed by Lenz, (opposing forces to rotation, reverse torque, etc) then generator circuit turns OFF and Motor takes over.
Of course, the 'perfect scenario' would be that both LC Tank Components are in very well-tuned resonance, so it will keep bouncing back and forth in sync with rotation cycles between Motor & Generator...and this is the part which is very hard to achieve...it is like the accuracy of a Swiss Clock Synchronized Movement.
Where IF it is not properly in sync, it will simply NOT work.

Does it makes sense to you?...do you understand this explanation above?

Quote from: MerLynn on Jan 07, 2025, 09:14 PMI have a lot of discussions with Joe on these motor/generator designs. Joe liked the 'old' stuff. He particularity liked the original one wire 'electricity' on the really old cars.

I do love this old technology...basically these old Dynamos, they are solid pieces of steel that could be rebuilt over and over (and rebuilding kits are still available), simply because there are thousands of antique car collectors and some of these vehicles could cost a fortune called 'COPI' (Cars Of Particular Interest)...so, people do spent a fortune rebuilding them (I have done lots of them COPI's)...Dynamos do not have the epoxy resin on armature and stators, which you need to burn down in order to take it off on the new generator and motors build methods.
On these old machines you could easily 'unwind' turn by turn to later on measure each turn resistance and inductance if you rewind it on a plain steel core...for experimenting of course.

The "one wire electricity" on vehicles is because Negative runs through all the steel on the car, including the frame and body, called "ground". So, they only use 'one wire' which is the positive to run from one end to the other of vehicle.

Now all new vehicles have thousands of wires running all over, with so many different voltages and currents that travel from sensors all over the car and engine and transmission to the all processors or 'computers' to then go to all the 'actuators' (solenoids) or executers or servo motors...which regulate-control liquids pressures, temperatures, volumes per time like mass flow sensors...which actually makes it a nightmare to simply 'diagnose' any malfunction on such complex design.

So, I do not blame Joe at all, for liking the 'old and simple stuff'...

Quote from: MerLynn on Jan 07, 2025, 09:14 PMThe IP of a Neutral Plate between 2 same Poles is the Mechanism to FOCUS the Wave Form Field and then take that Focal Point to anywhere its desired by the 'shape' of the Neutral Plate. The Neutral Plate is like a Magnifying lens but with a variable Field of Focus for the Neutral Centre Field. I would say its not a 'scalar beam' but a Distortion Field. His explanation of putting "2 North Poles together creates a 'scalar' beam"  just isn't understanding what he perceives he sees.

The interaction taking place between two magnetic poles of the same polarity is a very intriguing scenario as Ken Wheeler on his book (link to this site Topic>>) 'Uncovering the Missing Secrets of Magnetism' defines the interaction between like poles (on page 71) as quoted below:

QuoteREPULSION: Two likewise spin fields causing deflection; this is mirror membrane Ether deflection, this is literally extremely high-pressure space.

ATTRACTION: A negative pressure counterspatial voidance sink.

Actual Science says there is a 'No-Field' scenario between same poles interactions...while THERE IS a 'Field' ONLY on Attracting Poles...which is completely wrong!!

Quote from: MerLynn on Jan 07, 2025, 09:14 PMAt the 7.42 mark, he demonstrates this 'same pole' combining with what appears to be a ring magnet and a spherical magnet. This clearly IS NOT joining 2 same poles together. The case is split so two same poles dont create that 'spike scalar beam' he believes to be there.

Bedini speaks on that video a lot of things that borders into the 'mythical side' I believe he does thinks this way about the way Lockridge works...As he also mentions that brushes sparking is a 'radiant energy spark'...and that is how energy is generated...and -with all due respect to Bedini, RIP, I have to disagree with all those concepts when applying it to this Electromagnetic Machine.

Quote from: MerLynn on Jan 07, 2025, 09:14 PMWas the original Lockridge Case split into 4 like he says at the 6.20 mark?

If you add Two cuts on the case it will create Two not Four Divisions on case, as He says on video, it is simply an error.

However, I believe no one alive -even at the time this video was filmed- has ever seen the original BOSCH Device that soldier Lockridge brought from Germany in post war 1945...

All they have seen are the replicas based on a Delco Remy Dynamo...adapted by Lockridge and his team.

Quote from: MerLynn on Jan 07, 2025, 09:14 PMWould the parts on the bench be reverse engineered or a new engineered device? His reproduction appears as 2 hemispheres not the 4 described earlier as the Lockridge device. Is this correct?  Was it reversed engineered exactly? Could we be looking at something completely 'different'?

As far as I interpret and understand the video, they (Lockridge and team) took apart the original BOSCH Dynamo from Germany and "adapted" to a similar embodiment, but built in USA, a Delco-Remy (GM) Dynamo.

If you compare the manufacturing quality control, between both machines (a German and an American made) there are HUGE differences in every step...and I have two old Dynamos from BOSCH from those times that I purchased a few weeks ago, one came from UK, from an antique collector and the second from USA and newer type...the detail in construction is just like night and day...plus the German one have different resistances and inductances, smoother commutator, more bars, etc...is like comparing a Mercedes Benz with a Chevy Camaro...

So, making a replication from the original German machine into a rougher built Delco-Remy Dynamo, I believe it took them some time to get it running and 'tuned' properly, EVEN, counting every turn of wire on external trifilar inductor or extending the copper capacitor plate to measure the total length...they never changed the armature on the Delco-Remy Dynamo...and again, both armatures are very different, not only on better construct, but on spec's.

So, I imagine this 'adaptation' gave him a lot of headaches...but no, I do not think it was a 'reversed engineering' what they did.

Remember, they were not engineers...but pretty great handymen and laymen working on this project to make a living after returning from war...

Quote from: MerLynn on Jan 07, 2025, 09:14 PMat the 8.20 mark am I correct in he's trying to explain the 90 degree interaction of Polarities that cause 'rotation'?

From 7:30 to 7:50 He explains the 'cuts' or slots done on casing (which are ONLY TWO) NOT Four, so, if you have two slots this divides the outer housing in TWO, NOT in Four parts like He says.

On mark 8:20 on he starts speaking about two N poles FACING each other's...and this IS NOT the case on the two North Stators that are on the casing. They are 'sideways' and NOT facing each other's...so, there is not a DIRECT/FACE TO FACE/POLE TO POLE Interaction.

Basically, what he actually needs to FOCUS ON, is on the Interactions between ARMATURE and Stators, and NOT between Stators, like there would not be an 'Armature' in between, is like totally ignoring it.

The best way to understand Rotation on ANY Electric DC Brushed Motor is using a 'Tool' that I have developed, which is also on this Topic, and I call it "Torsion Fields".

Quote from: MerLynn on Jan 07, 2025, 09:14 PMCan you help me understand some of these queries Ufo?

I have tried...and I had to review again this long video...to answer based on your 'time marks'...so, I hope my effort has helped you somehow...

Regards

Ufopolitics