Hello again,

Lastly, in an overall concept of how this Lockridge Device Machine, I believe it could work...

This is a completely Asymmetrical System, however, it differs from my Asymmetric Machines, simply because the part where the asymmetry was set on mine, was on the Armature, NOT on Stators positioning or size.

This Lockridge Device is connected to Two Capacitors, one is Electric (explained on video and made of copper sheets wrapped in between with Butcher Wax Paper) and the other is a "Magnetic Capacitor" or as we all know it...an "Inductor".

There is no "magnetic reminiscence" here to start generator output, BUT there is the Electric Cap, that connected in Parallel with Output Circuit, (Tank Circuit) will retain some current flowing.

Same as Motor, I believe by being connected with an Inductor of the kind shown, it would be able -by a fast spin- to start sparks on commutator.

As Both Circuits, Motor and Generator also interconnect between them...to keep motor running.

Also, this System needs a Load (the Lamps)...in order to close the generator circuit, and generate a field within, which will also assist on motor rotation.

Anyways, this is just my opinion...as all this needs further work, first, more theoretical, then on a real machine.
As I believe it could be done.

Regards

Ufopolitics

Hi Ufo,

I have been following this thread with some interest.  I do like your analysis.  However in your last post  you made a statement I have to respectfully disagree with.  You stated there was no magnetic reminiscence to start generator output.  If a generator has been run before and had output then the steel core will retain some magnetic reminiscence..  In fact back in the days when generators were common on autos.before most of you were born generators had to be " flashed'  before they would start charging.  Depending on whether the  auto was positive or negative ground the proper voltage was applied to the field windings to magnetize them enough to get the generator to start charging.  You could in fact use the same generator for either positive ground or negative ground vehicles depending on what polarity you used to flash the field windings.

Respectfully,
Carroll

Quote from: citfta on Nov 10, 2024, 08:41 PMHi Ufo,

I have been following this thread with some interest.  I do like your analysis.  However in your last post  you made a statement I have to respectfully disagree with.  You stated there was no magnetic reminiscence to start generator output.  If a generator has been run before and had output then the steel core will retain some magnetic reminiscence..  In fact back in the days when generators were common on autos.before most of you were born generators had to be " flashed'  before they would start charging.  Depending on whether the  auto was positive or negative ground the proper voltage was applied to the field windings to magnetize them enough to get the generator to start charging.  You could in fact use the same generator for either positive ground or negative ground vehicles depending on what polarity you used to flash the field windings.

Respectfully,
Carroll

Hello Citfta,

Thanks for your comment, mostly appreciated, as always welcome!!
Yes, also agree 100% with your opinion.
I was specifically referring to a small magnet mounted on armature, like newer generators have.
But yes, definitively the steel on armature always maintain magnetic reminiscence as I believe also the stators as well.

Regards

Ufopolitics 

Hello, friends!

I will express my thoughts a little about the possible solution of the German engineer in the generator (Lockridge). The main thing is that the researchers never managed to get a working model, and Bedini only expressed a version of a possible principle, but never launched the generator or did not give public information about this launch. This is a fact and start from it. In my practice, I have also seen DC generators and relay voltage regulators on cars. In the 40s of the last century, the simplest DC generators were mainly used, where there were two excitation coils and one pair of brushes.




In the photo (Lockridge) we see that the two coils on the stator have a different wire cross-section. There is also a high probability that they were added to the design as an addition or something was changed (shift relative to the cross-shaped arrangement, as in generators with four coils), probably had a purpose.
Secondly, the anchor that is described had no design changes (we do not know what was in reality).

The main thing is that the device had elements of both a motor and a DC generator, closed in series, and the load was connected in parallel to both the generator and the motor. which worked in self-propelled mode. Increasing the winding on some coils increases both the resistance and the number of turns, which entails an increase in the magnetic induction that the coil forms. Probably the solution should be very simple and ingenious.

Quote from: Ufopolitics on Nov 10, 2024, 07:16 PMHello again,

Lastly, in an overall concept of how this Lockridge Device Machine, I believe it could work...

This is a completely Asymmetrical System, however, it differs from my Asymmetric Machines, simply because the part where the asymmetry was set on mine, was on the Armature, NOT on Stators positioning or size.

This Lockridge Device is connected to Two Capacitors, one is Electric (explained on video and made of copper sheets wrapped in between with Butcher Wax Paper) and the other is a "Magnetic Capacitor" or as we all know it...an "Inductor".

There is no "magnetic reminiscence" here to start generator output, BUT there is the Electric Cap, that connected in Parallel with Output Circuit, (Tank Circuit) will retain some current flowing.

Same as Motor, I believe by being connected with an Inductor of the kind shown, it would be able -by a fast spin- to start sparks on commutator.

As Both Circuits, Motor and Generator also interconnect between them...to keep motor running.

Also, this System needs a Load (the Lamps)...in order to close the generator circuit, and generate a field within, which will also assist on motor rotation.

Anyways, this is just my opinion...as all this needs further work, first, more theoretical, then on a real machine.
As I believe it could be done.

Regards

Ufopolitics

Hello again UFO. Lots of information brought forth here.I like what you have proposed hers. I can say that the coil position of S2 does aid in rotation with the right resistance of the coil it self with the right resistance of the load. That coil position in the area of the armature where the flux changes direction I believe. What ever it is it does aid in rotation. Now S4 coil may need to be moved forwards or backwards (with rotation or against rotation) to get the right area of the armature so it wont slow the armature down. This depends on which way the motor is originally rotating.