EEG_EM_New_Technique_TRANSVERSE_FLUX (TF) (Provisional Patent Applied for)

[partzman]

I guess any free resource provided here can not form part of any patent restrictions and I mean all free testing and new ideas. Normally they will be part of open source general knowledge and science. Hopefuly ufopolitics and Lorentzo can confirm this. Otherwise this is going to be just madness where anyone can land here with an "an idea with merits" and pending patent for this idea, create a flame war to obtain free analyse/testing and fishing for new tips/improvements to make them part of his patent.

It is obvious, that not everyone on this or other forums have the skills or ability or resources for such endeavour and individuals like solarlab is taking advantage off. And his attitude as considering himself/herself better than anyone else is based on almost nothing else than access to a lab and an idea with merits.

So, I am questioning again why someone with a pending patent expose the potential patent on an open source forum ? The attitude of the claimant can narrow down number of answers. I only trust my instincts and nothing else.

Classic,

SL at present, has filed a Provisional patent as noted in his first post.  Basically then, he has 1 year to file a formal application from the date the Provisional was logged at the USPTO.  Now the kicker is, one can not change any of the content of function of the provisional patent when filing the formal application.  The advantage of filing a provisional is to secure a date for your IP at a relative low filing fee but there is no examination at this time.  This will all follow at the formal application.

If the yearly deadline is passed with no formal patent application filing, the Provisional patent IP becomes prior art.

Regards,
Pm

[solarlab]

Partzman & Classic:

You "kids" should move on to something where you actually have a bit of experience at
plus know something about.

Each post you make shows more and more that you have nothing to contribute to the
EE_TFG concept except nonsense and unrelated jibberish.

You have not responded to even one of my questions, rebuttals or explainations. That 
pretty much says it all! The only reason you both are here is to fight - but it takes two
for that to happen and I refuse to lower myself to that level (learned that in Troll class).

But, I'm sure that won't happen, since your jealously and hatred of me, and my work, will
remain your "prime driving force" - which has nothing to do with the pursuit of excess
energy! 

Start your own projects - it's great therapy if nothing else!

Your constant OT harassment it's really unfair to those who are engauged in doing actual
"real research" on the subject... This also includes all threads where you post.

SO, GIVE IT A REST - We all know your opinions and views, you have expressed them a
thousand times. Just forget your childish reactions, sand-box behavour, hate, and loathing.

Nothing is going to change at my end - the devices are in-the-works - so there is only
one other course available to you both; Grow Up!

SL

[partzman]

SL,

I'm ignoring your rant above. 

OK, now down to business.  I have enough 1" U-I core material in M-19 by Magnetics to build a complete 8 station system plus the L298N half bridges but, before I go to all that trouble to build, test, and document my version of your EE_TFG, I decided to check out a single stage using an EC-52 ferrite core set with the middle legs removed.  

The N and S pole windings are 200T each and the loop windings are 50T each all wound in 8-34 Litz and the layout is as you describe.  The loop windings are circular and ~8" in diameter.

The input signal source is a Rigol DG4162 driving a 3/4 bridge (diode to supply on 2nd phase) at 6kHz, 50% d/c.  The DC supply is 64v supplied by a Rigol DP832.  Measurements were taken with a Tek MDO3034 and a Tek TCP0020 current probe with the input energy calculated by the scope Math and the output calculated from the current probe measurements.  The loads on the loop windings are Caddock non-inductive 100 ohm, 1% film resistors.

Without taking up forum bandwidth, I will simply state the results rather than displaying the scope traces, etc.

The results were input energy Uin=201.9Uj, recovered input energy Uinrec=62.6uJ, and the total output energy Uout=141.7uJ.  This results in a net efficiency of 141.7/(201.9-62.6) = 1.017 .  Although a slight gain, these results could be the result of measurement error and component tolerance.

Regards,
Pm

 

[solarlab]

Partzman,

So - good to hear it worked for you! Even without any design effort and using a ferrite core.

Nice work - thanks for the info...

SL

[Electro]

Partzman,

I wonder if you can clarify the "64V" on the DC supply - that Rigol is a 30V unit.

Also, what led you to use 6KHz?