Hello to All,

Ok, as I have promised, here is the Diagram for Method 2 (I have not been posting that much because I am still winding the 7 coil rings, to make a test video)

The wiring connections here, are identical to the way Figuera shows on his 1908 Patent, except for the "R Box" which He have it separated from N-y-S Coils.

And finally, I get to have a full view of what he meant, when he separated that R Box from the rest of the other coils (primaries plus secondaries)

It simply means that the R Box connections and it's coils, go to each individual N-y-S Single Module (On Patent there are Seven (7) of these Modules).

Therefore, what you are seeing on the image above, is just ONE MODULE of the [N-R-Y-S] assembly...However, only One Rotary Switch (Commutator and Brush), would be required to run all Seven Modules.

Now, how do we connect the Seven (7) R Boxes to one commutator?...It could be in Parallel or in Series?, 

and the "logical" answer would be in Parallel, because Inductive Resistance would be reduced considerably...And based on the following details you will understand why:

First, if you all notice, I have only Seven (7) Ring Coils (purple color, numbered from 1 to 7)

Second, the Two Primary Coils (N & S) will be ON at all times during operation of the Generator Machine, therefore, they should be wound with very fine gauge wire, and many turns.

The Coils I am using for Primaries, I already had them built about six years ago...and are 23 gauge, resistance is around 12.5 Ohms each (Hot are 15.5 ohms)

Now, the Ring Coils are wound with the SAME Gauge as Primaries, BUT, with much less resistance. (the rings I am building now are 23 gauge and around 3.2 Ohms each)


These Ring Coils are just "floating extensions" of the Two Primaries, and depending on Brush positioning, the Primary Fields will fluctuate.

However, on this Method #2, neither Primaries, nor ALL the Ring Coils, would NEVER TURN OFF...So Fields will never collapse...they will just fluctuate, meaning, EXPAND or RETRACT.

1- When Brush is at Contact #1 Primary N Magnetic Field would be retracted to it's own Coil (not expanded by any ring coils) While Primary S Magnetic Field would be at Max expansion.

2- When Brush is at Contact #8 Primary S Magnetic Field would be retracted to it's own Coil size, and Primary N Field would be at Max expansion.

3- Secondary y, is here as the rectangle in light yellow, and it expands all the way of the Seven (7) Ring Coils length. (it is positioned similar as it was on Method # 1, except, that now it does not go under N1 and S1.

This movement of both Fields will cause a perfect AC Output Sinewave on Secondary y.

4- The Magnetic Orientation for Both Primaries and All Ring Coils is a perfect Attraction Chain or:  (PN) N/S-[1N/S-2N/S-3N/S-4N/S-5N/S-6N/S-7N/S]-N/S (PS)

Therefore, the connections of the Ring Coils are End of First Coil with Start of next coil on the sequence and derives to commutator sequence number as shown on image...


On this setup, due to its higher resistance, we can drive it with higher voltages, and it will consume much less amperage, however, the magnetic field would have a very high strength!!

As we increase the speed of our switching device, and we add some power to system, the Ring coils will start to "fill up" Primaries at both ends... the same as if we rotate an armature on a Dynamo from the late 1800's...

A special note about building the ring coils with the "Bifilar wires" on this Method: I do NOT recommend them... Because of following disadvantages:

1- These Method Sequencing is NOT About-Facing SAME POLARITY FIELDS, as in prior Method #1, therefore, there is no need to set one end positive as another negative...

2-There is an ODD Number of Ring Coils (7)

3- You will be reducing the length of your secondary.

4- Your Field "Space-Time Jumps" will be much shorter.

EDIT 1: BIFILAR TYPE FOR RING COILS WILL NOT WORK HERE AT ALL, since you will just be reducing the FLUCTUATION SPACE TRAVEL OF FIELD. CAUSING Output to REDUCE.


NOTE: I would be editing a lot this post, as it have too much info here...and I may keep adding important points to it.

Regards

Ufopolitics

  No Diodes, no caps?, i love the simplicity of this design UFO, just need to catch up on some farm work and will get started.

 Warm Regards  Cornboy.       

Quote from: Cornboy on Jan 26, 2024, 10:14 PMNo Diodes, no caps?, i love the simplicity of this design UFO, just need to catch up on some farm work and will get started.

 Warm Regards  Cornboy.       

Great to know you like it Cornboy!!

Warm regards

Ufopolitics

Hello from France UFOPOLITIC
I thank you for all this rediscovery of this patent and the transmission of this information from the static generator that you shared.
I am ready to build this system by calculating the length of the windings using their resistance which you mention.
for me as soon as a prototype works I continue to build three to have the three-phase with 3 distributors offset by 120 degrees.
A question regarding the magnetic core:
compared to the Figuera patent it is in three end-to-end parts with fine insulation and in your drawing it is in one piece,
What is the best solution?
THANKS
(I use Google to help me translate)
Is it possible to participate in the manufacturers group?

Quote from: bigeasy on Jan 27, 2024, 07:39 AMHello from France UFOPOLITIC
I thank you for all this rediscovery of this patent and the transmission of this information from the static generator that you shared.

Bonjour Monsieur!!
Comment vas-tu?
C'est un plaisir

Quote from: bigeasy on Jan 27, 2024, 07:39 AMI am ready to build this system by calculating the length of the windings using their resistance which you mention.
for me as soon as a prototype works I continue to build three to have the three-phase with 3 distributors offset by 120 degrees.

That is a GREAT idea!!...yes, we can also have a "three phase brush-commutator rotary switch" on the same unit...

Quote from: bigeasy on Jan 27, 2024, 07:39 AMA question regarding the magnetic core:
compared to the Figuera patent it is in three end-to-end parts with fine insulation and in your drawing it is in one piece,
What is the best solution?

We are still developing the cores for what is best, however, we need a perfectly running system first, before we start developing the best core...
But for best results we know that laminated steel would work much better than a solid steel core, in order to reduce eddy or parasitic currents.
Have in mind that this System does not moves physically, so, there is no need for "air gaps".
Also, the ideal core would be one that we can take it apart, (disassemble) to fix a specific coil that is shorted or burnt...or have access to the wiring connections.

Quote from: bigeasy on Jan 27, 2024, 07:39 AMTHANKS

De rien!

Quote from: bigeasy on Jan 27, 2024, 07:39 AM(I use Google to help me translate)

Google fait du bon travail, Ah?

Quote from: bigeasy on Jan 27, 2024, 07:39 AMIs it possible to participate in the manufacturers group?

You are on the Builder's Group, welcome!

Bienvenu au Groupe des Bâtisseurs!

Cordialement

Ufopolitics