Open Source Free Energy & Over Unity Forums...and If You think none of these terms are real, they do not exist, or is just fiction, then PLEASE>>DO NOT ENTER!!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change-Free Energy will give us hope,
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Words from Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin of Overunity Forum
I really love those words from Stefan, reason why they are here..
Overunity.com Forum is online at Overunity.com Archives

Electromagnetic Generator Theory

Started by rakarskiy, Dec 12, 2023, 09:24 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 16 Guests are viewing this topic.

Ufopolitics

Quote from: rakarskiy on Jan 04, 2024, 03:19 PM


That way that You have "Interpreted" Figuera above...is the same way we were doing it for the last 115 years...and guess what?...

IT DOES NOT WORK!!

R can not be "plain and simple resistors" I have tried that!!...NO, it DOES NOT WORK!!

I have tried with "Part G Toroid...IT DOES NOT WORK!!

All it was, is a MISSINTERPRETATION of Figuera Patent!!

Ufopolitics
Principles for the Development of a Complete Mind:Study the science of art. Study the art of science.
Develop your senses- especially learn how to see. Realize that everything connects to everything else.
―Leonardo da Vinci

citfta

Okay!  Got it.  The vertical and horizontal part is what had me confused.  But I agree only the wires that are 90 degrees to the moving or changing field will be induced.

Regards.
Just because it is on YouTube does NOT make it real!

Ufopolitics

Quote from: citfta on Jan 04, 2024, 03:39 PMOkay!  Got it.  The vertical and horizontal part is what had me confused.  But I agree only the wires that are 90 degrees to the moving or changing field will be induced.

Regards.

Ok, great Citfta!!

Now, move into the Figuera Method I am showing...compare displacement of Magnetic Field(s), Vectors, lines of force, etc.. from the point of view of the Induced wires loop...

Then draw your own conclusions...related to which wires of the induced loop, would not get induced by this change-movement of fields?

...if there are any at all?

Thanks

Regards

Ufopolitics
Principles for the Development of a Complete Mind:Study the science of art. Study the art of science.
Develop your senses- especially learn how to see. Realize that everything connects to everything else.
―Leonardo da Vinci

rakarskiy

An acquaintance of mine found something in a previous Korean patent.

Below is an excerpt from patent KR10-1913746 B1:
[0049] Figures 4A and 4B are schematic illustrations of the operation principle of the output unit 130 of a frequency and voltage controlled alternator according to one embodiment of the present invention.
 [0050] As shown in Fig. 4a, a direct current from the direct current source 110 is supplied to the first field winding 134 (forward excitation coil) via the IGBT IC PM (not shown), while no current is supplied to the second field winding 135 (reverse excitation coil), and N, S poles are formed on the magnetic pole 133. When current is applied to the second excitation winding 135 (reverse excitation coil) via the IGBT IC PM (not shown), no current is applied to the first excitation winding 134 (forward excitation coil) of the first winding, and poles S, N are formed on the magnetic pole 133.
[0051] Thus, the magnetic field N, S and the magnetic field S, N are applied to the magnetic pole 133 through the first excitation winding 134 and the second excitation winding 135, forming an alternating magnetic field in the armature winding 136, ultimately generating an alternating voltage EMF therein.
[0052] When current is applied to the first field winding 134 (forward winding) or the second field winding 135 (reverse winding), the windings in the other direction have already generated an electromotive force. The armature winding already has electromotive force, so the power output of unit 130 increases while the current from unit 110 remains the same
[0053] Fig. 4b shows: the IPPT power (of block110) is applied to the first winding 134 for a first quarter (T) of the cycle time and then switched off. The IPPT power 110 is then applied to the second field winding 135 for the second half (T) to three quarters (T) of the cycle time and then disconnected.
It can be seen that single-phase AC power is ultimately delivered through the armature winding 136. The power factor in Fig. 4b is illustrative and can, of course, be changed to a suitable power factor.


P.S. Fig. 4a and Fig. 4b are taken from a PDF document  in Korean and checked with the corresponding figures from this patent in two other languages - English and Chinese - as well as the text of the patent as a whole
___________

I have been using this four-stroke system for a long time, but I have never had more than a KOP-1.4.
Definitely the same four-stroke system that Alec used in his transformer US9620280B2 - Energy management system - Google Patents

rakarskiy

Good day friends!
A bit about interesting comparisons;

Excerpt from the book "New Sources of Energy" by Alexander Frolov (inventor of Ф-machine, Ф-transformer), about Andrey Melnichenko's generator design:
QuoteIn 2010-2011 we discussed with him the successful tests of his generators organised at the Moscow Technical University. At this stage, efficiencies of 150-200 % have been obtained, allowing the design of "advanced" battery-powered uninterruptible power supplies that do not require recharging from the mains. One of Melnichenko's schemes is shown in Fig. 104.
Новые источники энергии _104.jpg
Fig. 104.
One of the schemes of the Melnichenko generator. Frequency adjustment or coil core adjustment is required. In general, it is the usual resonant mutual induction. However, the flux-coupling in this case is weak, so the effect of the induced current field of the second electromagnet on the primary source is negligible. The primary source creates the changing field, and the secondary source converts the field energy fluctuations. It can be said that the second electromagnet is more similar to a detector circuit or a "resonant receiver of ether oscillations" than to the secondary circuit of a transformer.
The essence of this effect is that if you put next to an "open electromagnet" (whose core is not closed, for example, a rod or a bar of ferrite) another "open electromagnet", an electromotive force is induced in the winding of the second electromagnet, and some power can be extracted.


If you draw my scheme of the inverse converter (link) with two windings of the transformer, the principle of operation of the secondary circuit EMF is identical. The question is that the smoothness of reduction of magnetic induction in the core(s) Andrew solved with an additional resistance Lamp X1. In my variant RC chain was used to minimise the reverse current in the primary circuit of the circuit and to increase the self-induction EMF in the window of the transformer with the secondary winding. The self induction EMF  which started the process  of operating the secondary circuit inductor from the maximum EMF value.   



This point, I was led to realise what to look for in the Figueras system, is when a smooth pulse  of increasing current in the circuit, without changing the applied voltage to the control coil and a simultaneous procedure of generating generator type EMF in the secondary  circuit.                                ;



Open Source Free Energy-Over Unity Systems Research/Development/Disclosure/Discussions