Quote from: emiboom2 on Dec 28, 2023, 03:59 PMHappy Holidays to all.

 I am delighted to be allowed to participate. I think Ufo has achieved the most difficult thing and I suppose that what we can contribute are small improvements and collaborate where we can to expand this knowledge to benefit humanity in general.

As Figuera said, the whole point is to change the state of magnetization of the nuclei so that currents appear in the armature. I have seen the latest UFO videos, and on the oscilloscope, it is seen that when activating the first inductor there is a lot of output due to the induced one, but when connecting the following ones the output decreases. Obviously they are not changing the magnetization state of the core as well as the first inductor. Can we improve that point?

The current that circulates through the coil multiplied by the number of turns gives us the intensity of the magnetic field that we apply and they call it "H Field", however if within that inductor there is a good quality ferromagnetic material, the magnetic field is applied. generated without consuming more energy, the ferromagnetic nucleus gives us a field hundreds of times greater, that free field and which can be hundreds of times greater than the H field, we call it "Field B", well when connecting the first inductor a current through the coil that creates H field and also B field, but when we connect the second one we spend on generating H field but we no longer obtain as much B field because the domains that were oriented with the first coil no longer need to be oriented because they are already looking in the direction of the first inductor.

Do you think that if every time Ufo switches an inductor after the first, if the core had domains available to orient itself when connecting the rest of the inductors, it would have more output? I think that if each inductor when connected has domains to orient itself, it will offer more output and the output signal when connecting each inductor will be more similar to the first inductor. That reminds me of Figuera who comments that the inductors are a group of true electromagnets, UFO has connected all the electromagnets sequentially on the same nucleus and has achieved superunity, but it applies energy all the time to a nucleus that is increasingly saturated, and if each inductor coil had its own independent core, and the induced coil embraced all of them.

Imagine four nuclei as if they were iron nails, each nail coiled, you make a bundle as if you took a package of spaghetti each coiled, and you coil the induction embracing the four electromagnets at the same time, now when you switch the first electromagnet you have maximum cam H and B in the first nail, and when commuting the second you also have maximum Field H and B because the second inductor hugs a nail that was not magnetized and so on until the last one.

Many thanks Emilio,

So, if I understood correctly, you meant that we should have the full steel core cut in pieces according to the number of inductors we have on the Two Groups Sequence...
Other words, in my setup case, I will have to cut in order to make Eight short cylinders, each cylinder the same length of each single sequential coil...right?

And of course, I understood that Secondary still wraps around the 8 steel smaller cylinders...

And does it need any insulation in between cylinders or an Air Gap?, like brass or copper? or just using a brass headless screw to hold together each core be enough?...

I do understand perfectly what you are meaning with above post...excellent idea!!

Actually I was looking for a way to modify the steel core, in order to get even more out of it...and they were much clever designs than just having the center cylinder cut in straight sections.


Thanks Emilio!!

Regards and Happy New 2024!!


Ufopolitics

You haven't understood me because I didn't explain myself well. I put a drawing I hope it can be seen because it is the first time I upload one from my mobile.
As you can see, when activating the first electromagnet it only affects one nucleus, so when activating the second and subsequent ones each one has its independent nucleus.
Perhaps thus switching each inductor to a more even output. But forget it, it is too radical a change and we don't know if it will work.

Quote from: emiboom2 on Dec 29, 2023, 06:24 PMYou haven't understood me because I didn't explain myself well. I put a drawing I hope it can be seen because it is the first time I upload one from my
mobile. As you can see, when activating the first electromagnet it only affects one nucleus, so when activating the second and subsequent ones each one has its independent nucleus.
Perhaps thus switching each inductor to a more even output. But forget it, it is too radical a change and we don't know if it will work.

Hello Emiboom2,

Ok, I see what you meant now...

No, it will not work, simply because you are generating Four (4) independent and much thinner Magnetic Fields at each sequence, plus, this will not have the directional stepping effect (for Magnetic Field) that just one long core with  multiple ring type coils would do in Field Geometry.

With this one, you will be just engrossing / thickening, a Field composed by four spaced apart fields, but not straight sequencing in a forward directional sense...plus other things..like not bridging/aligning fields by their poles, etc, or not creating an amplifying magnetic chain >>N/S/N/S/N/S>>

The Forward Spacetime effect, that I have achieved so far, is a fully linear displacement of just one field (referring to One Sequential Group)...and I have Two Fields on my setup doing the same movement, but oppositely.

Thanks much

Ufopolitics

Edit: By the way, I arranged your image smaller and crop it...plus your text.

Hello Ufo.
I can't resist asking you what everyone wants to know, there is a lot of difference, disregarding the engine consumption, between the input cost and the output cost, if you can provide data please. I would understand if you don't want to answer yet. anyway thanks in advance.
a hug.
Emilio Leal


Pd. Ya no te molesto más y te dejo trabajar, termino de ver que me habías enviado mensajes privados, voy a leerlos que no me había dado cuenta. Ando un poco perdido por la página.

Quote from: emiboom2 on Dec 28, 2023, 03:59 PM.... I have seen the latest UFO videos, and on the oscilloscope, it is seen that when activating the first inductor there is a lot of output due to the induced one, but when connecting the following ones the output decreases. Obviously they are not changing the magnetization state of the core as well as the first inductor. Can we improve that point? ...

Hello emiboom2,

I think the decreasing output is being caused by the wire connection scheme. If you look at each exciting coil as a resistor, the amperage per coil decreases as each coil is added to the input current.
If the coils are wired in parallel, with each coil having it's own negative wire to ground, they are wired as a parallel resistor circuit. If the coils are wired in series then the resistance increases as each coil is added to the input.

The way to make each added coil equal in intensity would be to insure each coil receives the same constant amperage as each additional coil is activated.

BTW, I don't think core saturation is a factor at this time.

Regards
Cadman