Straight vs Circular Coil – Simulation Results
Electrical Parameters
Straight (no gap): L = 44.138 mH, Pin = 528.817 W, Pout = 950.667 W
Circular (gap 1.37 mm): L = 20.643 mH, Pin = 540.667 W, Pout = 484.559 W

Performance
Case 1.0: Poff = 105.63 W, Duty = 0.9, Eff = 179.773 %
Case 2.0: Poff = 53.839 W, Duty = 0.9, Eff = 89.622 %

See attachment: Image Straight VS Circular Coil

Hello,

Thanks @kampen so much for your Simulation Development plus Analysis on this design!!

It does help us a lot on future builds.

Now, something I would like to add...

The Stronger the Field you build, the WIDER the Gap needs to be, in order for the Secondary Spatial Wall to appear.

This is very easy to verify in real time, by using two weaker permanent magnets in attraction, say the old type Alnico or Ceramic, versus Two Neo's grade 45-50, using Magnetic Viewing Film to reveal the Center Wall at gap.

On the Neo's, your spatial center wall will start appearing at maybe ten times wider gap than the ceramic permanent magnets.

This is due to their GREATER VOIDANCE FORCE, that will literally disappear their two individual walls, to then reflect a Center one, even with a very large spatial gap between them.

This "Voidance Force" is like an "Implosion", where the Two Counterspace Forces from each Field (Bloch Walls) travels towards the very SPATIAL center at the Air Gap.

So, we need to have this in mind when building our models.

Even though, on this Singular (one) Magnetic Field System, there is only One Original, Primary, Counterspatial Field (Bloch Wall).

So, whenever we close this gap to zero, on a very strong singular field...what would happen to this Single, Original, Counterspatial Field?...seating exactly at 180 degrees from gap.

Would it "split" into two "Field entities", each one traveling to each pole ends, to meet at gap?...which looks very "Symmetrical", like on the example of two magnets getting closer at attraction.

Or... would this fully Counterspatial Field, moves on just One Direction, following the established rotational Magnetic Field forces?...or the B-Field Vector Direction?

Only real testing would give us the right answers...I believe so.

Regards

Ufopolitics

Kmpen, I do not understand the numbers here.

 
Straight vs Circular Coil – Simulation Results
Electrical Parameters
Straight (no gap): L = 44.138 mH, Pin = 528.817 W, Pout = 950.667 W
Circular (gap 1.37 mm): L = 20.643 mH, Pin = 540.667 W, Pout = 484.559 W

Performance
Case 1.0: Poff = 105.63 W, Duty = 0.9, Eff = 179.773 %
Case 2.0: Poff = 53.839 W, Duty = 0.9, Eff = 89.622 %

Case 1??      straight no gap between windings??
Case 2??    circular with gap 1.7 mm
Straight no gap v=between windings?
Poff?


 Norman

Quote from: NormanEB on Aug 13, 2025, 08:49 PMKmpen, I do not understand the numbers here.

 
Straight vs Circular Coil – Simulation Results
Electrical Parameters
Straight (no gap): L = 44.138 mH, Pin = 528.817 W, Pout = 950.667 W
Circular (gap 1.37 mm): L = 20.643 mH, Pin = 540.667 W, Pout = 484.559 W

Performance
Case 1.0: Poff = 105.63 W, Duty = 0.9, Eff = 179.773 %
Case 2.0: Poff = 53.839 W, Duty = 0.9, Eff = 89.622 %

Case 1??      straight no gap between windings??
Case 2??    circular with gap 1.7 mm
Straight no gap v=between windings?
Poff?


 Norman

Hello Norman,

This is about a Test I asked Kampen if he could run a simulation test...on a previous post I wrote.

Between a straight Cylindrical Coil and the Circular one...

Case 1 is the straight coil, Case 2 is the Circular one...

Poff means Power Off.

However, if you would be reading all posts in an 'orderly fashion' you will understand it.

Please do so.

Thanks

Ufopolitics