Next, I will open a Specific Topic under General Builders Category, where I will share some specifics about these builds, plus images about of my setup.

Sorry Guests, but this Future Thread would be "For Members Only"

The Membership is Free...

Regards

Ufopolitics

Hi Ufo,

Following along with great interest. This looks very good.

However, a thought and a suggestion for the future:

Referring to patent 44267,
"PRINCIPLE OF THE INVENTION Watching closely what happens in a Dynamo in motion, is that the turns of the induced circuit approaches and moves away from the magnetic centers of the inductor magnet or electromagnets, and those turns, while spinning, go through sections of the magnetic field of different power, because, while this has its maximum attraction in the center of the core of each electromagnet, this action will weaken as the induced is separated from the center of the electromagnet, to increase again, when the induced is approaching the center of another electromagnet with opposite sign to the first one."

I don't think your circuit does exactly that. If you graph your circuit current as a sine wave it appears that your induction will peak at 90 deg then collapse to almost 0 and immediately start increasing on the negative side, also at 90 deg or there about. Then the current of opposite sign will increase to max at 180 deg then collapse back to 0 at 180 deg. In effect, 2 half sines.

If the commutator segments were doubled a truer sine could be produced. Increase the connected coil segments from 1 to 8, then decrease one segment at a time back to the first. Then repeat the sequence for the opposite set of coils with the other half of the commutator segments. This should produce a full sine wave. The induced will output as the field is reduced just as it did while the field was increasing. A gradual decrease like this might also alleviate the sparking to a large extent when the inducing fields swap polarity.

Just something for you to think about.

Regards

Quote from: Cadman on Dec 05, 2023, 10:01 AMHi Ufo,

Following along with great interest. This looks very good.

Great, thanks Cadman, and welcome here!!

Quote from: Cadman on Dec 05, 2023, 10:01 AMHowever, a thought and a suggestion for the future:

I don't think your circuit does exactly that. If you graph your circuit current as a sine wave it appears that your induction will peak at 90 deg then collapse to almost 0 and immediately start increasing on the negative side, also at 90 deg or there about. Then the current of opposite sign will increase to max at 180 deg then collapse back to 0 at 180 deg. In effect, 2 half sines.

Sorry, but I have to disagree with your analysis, if I am understanding well (and I may not)...
Ok, each Magnetic Field in Gain Mode, say starting at Primary N, it gradually ascends to a peaks when the last coil in the sequence is powered (N-8) and that takes place exactly at 180º of Brush positioning. So, this is the Peak of sinewave, and not at 90º.
However, I do agree that when brush passes contact for Coil#8, ALL Sequential Coils collapse except the Primary (once we have a Cap on it, like I have shown previously)
And actually, when all these coils collapse, their BEMF returns to Cap through the series connections (no diode is required). And this makes the collapse, not to be a straight vertical fall (steep), but it smooths it out.
At least that is what I have been observing on my Scope...the "raw" signal is not smooth though; it is an escalated signal, that goes on the positive and negative side.

I have no idea, why you figured out that Positive sine peaks at 90 and Negative peaks at 180 degrees? If All the sequential Coils are exactly the same number plus the same configuration.

Quote from: Cadman on Dec 05, 2023, 10:01 AMIf the commutator segments were doubled a truer sine could be produced. Increase the connected coil segments from 1 to 8, then decrease one segment at a time back to the first. Then repeat the sequence for the opposite set of coils with the other half of the commutator segments. This should produce a full sine wave. The induced will output as the field is reduced just as it did while the field was increasing. A gradual decrease like this might also alleviate the sparking to a large extent when the inducing fields swap polarity.

I do not believe you read when I post about commutator "doubled" or with the jumpers, so I only have 8 contacts...it does not work for this setup.
If you use these jumpers you get 8 contacts only, then you only can use ONE Set of Sequential Coils, then it wires as Figuera Patent, meaning that we must connect this center sequence to both ends of each primary...I have been there and done that, it does not work when you insert, (like I am doing) the R Box in between Primaries.

Quote from: Cadman on Dec 05, 2023, 10:01 AMJust something for you to think about.

Regards

Thanks for the advice Cadman
But what I am disclosing here is a "Proven Concept that it works setup"...and I will continue doing it until I am finished, "as is" ...no changes for now...
Once that any of you (Builders here) start replicating it, yes, we may find better ways to improve it or develop it further.

Regards

Ufopolitics

Hello All,

I would like to add here that I am getting basically "the essence" from the Figuera Generator 1908 Patent.

Yes he starts his explanation based on the first generator from Clarke, a Rotary Generator, in order to view-analyze what is going on with the Magnetic Field, generated by the Exciter, whenever it rotates, and viewed from the Induced point of view...However, after that Figuera mentions Faraday's main principle of Induction, and the first experiment that led him to discover induction, is not exactly based on a rotary generator...but simply introducing a straight magnetic steel cylinder inside a straight hollow coil...and observing how the needle moved on his Galvanometer, whenever going inwards and outwards of coil.

So, this is exactly what I am doing here on this Magnetic Linear Pump Design, As Faraday did originally on his first experiment, except, I have Two Magnets instead of just one, one on each extreme of the induced coil, and working in a reciprocate way, so when we introduce one, the other is moved away...and vice versa.

Regards

Ufopolitics

Ok, I am using this post just to end this Page (since I have the Topics set for 5 Posts per page, due to the long posts with images that I am uploading, and I can change that anytime in the future)

I still have some more posts to upload here.
Please, wait until I am finished to add your post(s).

I got my hands full, and I want to finish at least this part.

Thanks

Ufopolitics