FIGUERA'S AETHER MAGNETIC FIELDS LINEAR PUMP, REVIVED

[Ufopolitics]

@kampen I just wanted to clarify something from the email you just sent me.

In it you mentioned this:

Per coil: 2 channels (Top Tᵢ + Bottom Bᵢ)
For 13 coils: Need 26 AC-switch channels TOTAL

Which topology are you aiming for? Ignore the fact that there are 14 coils in the pictures below, I know in your message you mentioned 13, but it's not important as far as the examples below are concerned.

What I expected was this:

where you have 14 coils and 14 switches - one for the negative side of the first 7 coils and one for the positive side of the remaining 7 coils.

But your email seems to suggest that you have the following:

where you have 14 coils and 28 switches, one switch for the positive and negative side of each coil.

If you proceed with the second topology and are opening the switches on both sides of the coil at the same time, then won't you be destroying the magnetic field that has built up around that coil?

In my mind the first topology looks the best, since the magnetic field will be sweeping over the coils from left to right and back again. With the make-before-break arrangement the magnetic field wouldn't be destroyed as it moves along.

Hello lfarrand,

You are totally right, the First topology-structure is the correct one.
We are switching TWO DISTANT TERMINALS (apart by Seven Coils) which are of the same number, one positive, the other negative.
We will ALWAYS be switching this way.

I have tried to explained it easier lately, by seen it as GROUPS, so, we have Seven Total Groups.
Where each group is by energizing #-1 & #+1= Group 1, and so on to Group 2= #-2 &#+2...and so on to Group 7, then back from G7 to G1...and repeat and repeat...

ALL THESE THIRTEEN (13) COILS [NOT 14] ARE CONNECTED IN SERIES.
So, there are Six (6) Coils Negative and Six (6) Positive PLUS a CENTER Coil, which is ALWAYS ON.
This Center Coil will serve us later on to Increase the Resistance of the whole Sequential Coils, in order to adjust the Constant Resistance of the Seven Coils, as we will also be decreasing the Currents (Amperage).

If we look closely, there would be ALWAYS Five (5) Coils ON, out of the seven of each group, the other Two (2) Coils are located at each end of the group, as the 'Transitioning Coils'.

Hope this clears the operation of this Machine, related to the Sequential Coils.

Regards

Ufopolitics

[Ufopolitics]

@ Ifarrand,

Here is my answer.
Which topology are we aiming for?

Topology #2  because each coil has a floating "AC-switch" on both terminals.
Two MOSFET legs per coil, each leg is a back-to-back N-MOSFET pair with its own isolated gate supply and driver.

  Bus+ ──[ AC-Switch Ti ]── Coil i ──[ AC-Switch Bi ]── Bus−
                (leg 1)                        (leg 2)

Parts count (so you can plan)
For 13 coils with topology #2:

• AC-switch legs: 2 per coil → 26 legs total.
• Isolated DC-DC converters: 1 per leg → 26 converters.
• Isolated gate drivers: 1 per leg → 26 drivers.

(For the earlier 14-coil example, simply 28 legs / 28 converters / 28 drivers.)

Final line:

• We are intentionally using Topology #2.
• The magnetic field does not get destroyed during the sweep, because we use Make-Before-Break so current always has a path into the next coil.
• Snubbers and surge absorbers are there only as a safety backstop if a coil is ever opened accidentally.

Hello Dear friend,

I honestly disagree with your choice for Topology #2.

Please answer questions below:

1- Where did you get this new arrangement of numbering the coils from 1 to 28?

2- Have I ever shown this design here?

Can you show how your sequencing takes place?

I have tried to give very easy explanations here, all the time.

As always, I  keep repeating the same, exact, consistent and non changing structures.

You use Topology #1, if you want to be successful on the Testing.

You turn ON #1 Positive AND #1 Negative at UNISON.
That will include ALL SEVEN SERIES CONNECTED COILS in between, repeat:  ALL SERIES CONNECTED COILS IN BETWEEN.

Then sequence moves to #2 Positive #2 Negative at UNISON.

And so on...and on...

Then you will need a Total of FOURTEEN (14) Bidirectional Switches.

And FOURTEEN (14) DC/DC Converters.

It can get any simpler than this, honestly.

Regards

Ufopolitics


EDIT 1: THIS CAN NEVER BE PARALLEL SWITCHING!!...IT IS A SERIES, SERIES CONNECTION BETWEEN ALL COILS.

[Ufopolitics]

@kampen

If you apply Topology #2

Which means switching single Coil by single Coil, each one with Two BPS.

Then your total added series resistance (on SERIES Connected Group of Coils) IS GONE, bye, bye...

So, you have 6.0 Ohms per coil, then your Amperage at just 12V Input will jump to 2.0 Amps per coil switching.

Whenever you INCREASE Input Voltage to 50V, then you will be driving at 8.3 Amps per coil...

I honestly, can not understand where did you come up with this arrangement?

Is this the same arrangement you had when conducting the previous tests?

Ufopolitics

[kampen]

@ Ufopolitics, 

You are right, and thank you for correcting me on this.

My answers to your two questions:

1) Where did "1...28" come from?
From my incorrect assumption that we were using "two switches per coil." I mapped 14 coils → 28 legs. 

That is my mistake.

2) Have you ever shown that design here?
No—the design you have been consistent about is the Series chain with tap-select, 
one bidirectional switch per tap on each side Left/Negative taps 1–7, Right/Positive taps 1–7

I am switching to your Topology #1.

[Ufopolitics]

NEW SERIES CONNECTIONS, DUAL SEQUENTIAL (+/-) ON SINGLE MODULE

Hello All,

Well, it seems like an "eternity" since I last posted here...mainly, because the Overunity Forum restauration into the New Archives...got me completely off from any building work...

However, I kept developing this Method(s) in my brain, as also followed by pen and paper sketches...and now, finally to a neat CAD Design...and I am still not done yet, as I want to take it to a different level, a Tridimensional CAD Design where I will Animate the Virtual Movement of the Magnetic Field along with the electrical switching.

Now here I will bring a New Approach to be able to Test the Excellent Drivers that Kampen built up for me...as last time I said I was not confident to test it on a Single Module where one of the sequential terminal boards would be off...either Negative or Positive...it was like a "Half Test" which will not give me any clear results.

So, now I have designed a New Approach, which I am very happy with, because of its simplicity...it is still starting as a Single Module, but it uses BOTH, (+/-) sequential connections at unison:

On this New design, basically because of its simplicity, would be -I hope- easier to understand...and it would be my "Testing Bed" for the Solid-State Drivers that Member Kampen sent me...I now feel very secure it will work perfectly well.

FIRST, if you all have noticed, the electrical connections to sequential coils are IN SERIES, no longer in Parallel, like before on a Single and on Dual Modules...

Basically, as many of you know, that Parallel Electrical Connections will completely REDUCE RESISTANCE to its max expression, as the more resistance we add, the less it becomes...
This allows Amperage to rise sky high, not counting with the BEMF Currents also present, whenever we connect-disconnect any coil.

Therefore, on this New SERIES Design, this issue will no longer be present, on the contrary, we can now use the simple Ohm's Law to calculate our Sequential Coils Resistance, based on the Input and Amperage we want the Exciters to run at.

So, on next post I will show a short sequence in Three (3) frames to demonstrate how this System works...

Again, I maybe editing this post as the next ones...and please, hold on to start posting here until I am finished, I will let you know.

Many thanks

Ufopolitics

ABOVE QUOTED POST IS FROM AUGUST 26, 2024

That Post is ONE (1) Year and TWO (2) Months OLD...It was then when I introduced this NEW LINEAR, SERIES TOPOLOGY. as TITLE WRITES for the first time.

And I have STILL the same, exact, consistent Structure Configuration up to NOW.

My Original Structure is based on 15 COILS, NOT 13, and that is the one I have built.

Kampen could not fit all 15 Coils on his steel core, then I had to redo the same structure ADAPTED to 13 Coils...

NEVER, related to this LINEAR-SERIES CONNECTION, I have EVEN suggested an "Alternative"  PARALLEL CONNECTION, NEVER!

Ufopolitics