EEG_EM_New_Technique_TRANSVERSE_FLUX (TF) (Provisional Patent Applied for)

[rakarskiy]

"Great minds discuss ideas, Average minds discuss events, Small minds discuss people." Eleanor Roosevelt.
We are all different, but the laws by which energy works are the same. Unfortunately official science ignores many facts of these laws. All synchronous generators with cores (winding on rods or stacking in a groove) work on the type of EMF induction based on the anapole moment at the focus of the annular magnetic flux (Anapole).  A striking example of the anapole moment is the Experiment of Christian MONSTEIN (Switzerland. 1997). 



To calculate the no-load EMF, engineers use the transformer EMF formula, generators are calculated on the basis of the magnetomotive force. In textbooks you the principle of operation indicate a frame generator, where the magnetic flux lines of force cut the phase wire, which is completely untrue for the operation of a core generator. This investigation of the two inductions I published in my paper:  [The invention of the electromagnetic generator].



I further established that IF there is another EMF (excitation) at the focus of the magnetic flux - opposite to the generator EMF, the latter will not occur and you get - intercurrent mutual induction, transformer type.  If there is a variable excitation electromagnet you will get a transformer, if there is a constant electromagnet and a change of magnetic flux you will get a generator. Unfortunately I had no EMF (in the secondary winding) at all neither transformer nor generator at cascade excitation of windings. I came to the conclusion that a split core is needed for excitation and winding stacking. At the present moment I do not conduct research due to deterioration of health, but all that above I have confirmed experimentally.

PS
Also there is a moment when self-induction of Magnetic field around a conductor (curl E = - dBi/dt) is taken as induction from change of magnetic field.
  

[Ufopolitics]

Also; to add a twist, let us add a discussion relating to:

"The Lorentz force formula and Maxwell's equations are two distinct physical laws,
yet the two methods yield the same results".

Looking forward to it with excitement!

SL

Hello SL,

Of course the two methods yield the same results!

That was supposed to be Lorentz's "job" goal.

Remember that Maxwell was FIRST, right?

They have made us all believe He was doing it to "synthesize/restructure" and so, "upgrading" Maxwell's Equations...

In reality what Lorentz did was to "extract" completely from the root of Maxwell Equations, everything that had to do with magnetic spatial waves, vortexes, curl functions, etc, etc...
To give us a "charged single wire behavior" within a magnetic field, and a totally ridiculous "method" (which have zero scientific methodology) to use the RIGHT HAND and positioning in a "certain way" to be able to "see" the forces alignments...pathetic!!
As "the coil" as we all know it, carrying "the charge", was completely erased.
Why?...because a "coil" WOULD ALWAYS GENERATE A SPATIAL MAGNETIC FIELD, whenever it is charged!!...while a single wire will not, only a weak and small field on its surrounding surface...easy to be CONVENIENTLY DISREGARDED!!

Lorentz wiped out all Curl Calculus and Torsion Forces to replace them by straight up vectors of force and tensors.

Which is completely off the reality...of how it really works.

And, of course it will render the same results, as Lorentz Force is just a cheap, distorted copy of the Maxwell's Magnetism reality.

However, I have to admit, Lorentz did an impeccable job, to the point, up to now, we are still believing it is "the only way"...

As some opinions (ignorant IMHO) may say that it supersedes Maxwell Equations.

And I consider that "assumption" completely pathetic.

Ufopolitics

[solarlab]

Well I'll bow out here (or GTFO as electro would say).

A series of lectures by Feynman and many articles and papers
are likely incorrect - or not... but I'll go with their conclusions
anyway!

Have a good one,

SL

[Ufopolitics]

Well I'll bow out here (or GTFO as electro would say).

A series of lectures by Feynman and many articles and papers
are likely incorrect - or not... but I'll go with their conclusions
anyway!

Have a good one,

SL

Good luck SL!!

[solarlab]

Thanks

The work I've done so far based on my analysis, design and theory seems
to perform amazing good so I'm happy with that. Plus the applications
development is moving along nicely.

A bigger task than it might first appear; lots of peripheral parts to sort out 
and integrate; but it's extremely interesting and quite exciting - the motivation 
amongst the extremely talented team members is very high as well!

Hope you fellows can finally crack the Figuera device at some point as it
appears to be quite similar, fundamentally, to the EE_TFG. 

It's all extremely interesting IMHO!

SL