FIGUERA'S AETHER MAGNETIC FIELDS LINEAR PUMP, REVIVED

[Ufopolitics]

METHOD 3: KEEPING RESISTANCE, INDUCTANCE EQUALIZED, DURING VIRTUAL FIELD DISPLACEMENT

This System, related to ALL Connections and operation of Positive Brush and Sequential Coils, is EXACTLY the same as Method 2, presented before.

The only variation on Method 3, is that Both End Fields are Segmented into Eight[8] Coils, which also runs on a synchronized sequence with the Seven [7] Positive Sequential Coils at center, Fields Sequence runs through a Second Negative Brush, which is exactly aligned (time wise) with Positive Brush.

This Model I am presenting here, the Exciter System is designed to run at 100 Volts and 2 Amps, and according to Ohm's Law, we need to keep a steady resistance of 50 Ohms.

Of course, at 50V Input, it will run with 1 Amp currents...and so on.

Please note that ALL COILS have the same resistance =6.25 Ohms...and geometrically, they are all RING Structured Coils like you have seen on previous methods on the sequential coils.

Main point on this design, is to ALWAYS have Eight Coils ON (50 Ohms), at each side of the Center of Positive Brush. (marked here with a Red Dotted Line plus two brackets to Right and Left, defining which 8 coils are ON).

By having a Center Positive Brush, and two End Negative contacts which closes circuit, this type of connection is PARALLEL, so it will result in around a +/- 50 Ohms @ its total resistance.

So, the Seven Sequential Center Coils (Armature) add a total resistance of 43.75 Ohms, therefore, they will always use -at least- one[1] Coil from either F1 or F2...

Again, I will be adding on this post later on...so, refresh screen to  see any changes on editing.

Next is a Commutator-Brush of the same Method 3

Regards

Ufopolitics 

[Ufopolitics]

METHOD 3 SYSTEM; DIAGRAM WITH DUAL COMMUTATORS-BRUSHES

Ok, I would like for you all to visualize this SWITCHING METHOD IN GENERAL, as the WIPER System on Vehicles Windshield wiper motors...it is a Back/Forth Swing.

So, on this System or Method 3, we have Two Wipers, one Positive and one Negative...and they work, NOT on the same plane (because if we have -/+ Brushes on the same plane, we will be reversing coils electrical polarity) ...And we do NOT want that!!

Positive and Negative brushes work at completely different levels, isolated, and each fed by two continuous slip rings -/+...

On this image, I have highlighted the connection terminals which are active according to Both Brushes positioned at Contact #4.

So, blue wires are negative and red are positive.

Please note that F1/8, F1/7, F1/6 on Left Field 1, plus F2/5, F2/6, F2/7, F2/8 on Right Field 2 are OFF...on this time-frame sequence. However, ALL Interaction Fields totaling 16 Coils are ON...

HOWEVER, during the WHOLE/ FULL CYCLE, NONE of the Coils involved on the CENTER MAIN INTERACTIONS, WILL NEVER Collapse or turn OFF.

On Fig below, I have rotated Brushes to Contact #1...and highlighted wire terminals ON, as you can see Field displacement...On this point Field 1 have ALL Coils power ON. (Retraction of Field 1)

Regards

Ufopolitics

[Ufopolitics]

Hello,

I wanted to keep working with the 16 contacts Commutator design, as in Figuera's Generator...

So, the math to design your Method 3, is very simple...all you need to know what your Input (V&A) would be...to calculate your Coils resistance based on Ohm's Law and gauge you would be using.

I will be working with 23 gauge...ALL Coils of Exciter System plus Fields, like I have so far.

According to CIRRIS wire resistance calculator based on length of 23 ga is 307 feet for each coil:

Regards

Ufopolitics

[citfta]

Hi Ufo,

I want to make a couple of comments that I hope will help with your research.  I believe you are putting too much thought into the resistance of your coils.  Resistance plays an important part when working with steady state DC.  However we are dealing with a constantly changing DC.  Although it is not true AC per say an inductor still reacts to it the same way.  I think you will have better results if you calculate the inductive reactance of your coils for the frequency you want them to work at.  I think you have a meter for checking inductance.  The  formula for calculating the inductive reactance is:

XL= 2 pi f l  Where f is the frequency in Hz and l is the inductance in Henries.  And XL of course is expressed as ohms.  So you just multiply 2 times pi times frequency and inductance to give you the reactive resistance of the coil.  The calculations will be off a little because they are based on a sine wave AC signal but they will still be consistant from one coil to the next as long as you keep the frequency the same.  I think also you probably will want to measure your inductance with all coils in place as the secondary and other primaries will affect the inductance.

Respectfully,
Carroll

PS:  I got my new microcontroller going now but found some problems with my driver board so I am rebuilding it to give better isolation between it and the microcontroller.

[Ufopolitics]

Hi Ufo,

I want to make a couple of comments that I hope will help with your research.  I believe you are putting too much thought into the resistance of your coils.  Resistance plays an important part when working with steady state DC.  However we are dealing with a constantly changing DC.  Although it is not true AC per say an inductor still reacts to it the same way.  I think you will have better results if you calculate the inductive reactance of your coils for the frequency you want them to work at.  I think you have a meter for checking inductance.  The  formula for calculating the inductive reactance is:

XL= 2 pi f l  Where f is the frequency in Hz and l is the inductance in Henries.  And XL of course is expressed as ohms.  So you just multiply 2 times pi times frequency and inductance to give you the reactive resistance of the coil.  The calculations will be off a little because they are based on a sine wave AC signal but they will still be consistant from one coil to the next as long as you keep the frequency the same.  I think also you probably will want to measure your inductance with all coils in place as the secondary and other primaries will affect the inductance.

Respectfully,
Carroll

PS:  I got my new microcontroller going now but found some problems with my driver board so I am rebuilding it to give better isolation between it and the microcontroller.

Hello Citfta,

Thanks, I will do the measurements, and yes, I do have an Inductance meter.
The point on doing this measurement (finding Inductive Reactance) is to then take it to Ohm's law, to calculate Current, correct?

And I am not putting too much thought on resistance than actually on Field behavior, the frequency we need to use is a constant, 50-60 hertz, and that is not going to change.

This Methods require, in order to work properly, for Field to -at least- maintain its strength during the sequencing...and that is not happening, even though it "looks" very strong.

The "ideal" operation would be that Field increase strength as it expands...and decrease strength as it retracts...it is happening exactly the opposite.

Amperage gain lays exactly on that part...on keeping Field strength at least the same throughout the displacement.

On this Method 3, all I use are mechanical means, to maintain field with same strength during operation. And only way to do that is by maintaining same resistance.

Anyways, this is not about resistance, or inductance...it is about Field Strength...and that is our goal.

Regards

Ufopolitics