FIGUERA'S AETHER MAGNETIC FIELDS LINEAR PUMP, REVIVED

[Ufopolitics]

Hi Fessor,

What you are seeing is what the Figuera device is supposed to do.  According to the theory about the device as you put voltage into the coils of one polarity they should induce voltage into the coils of the opposite polarity.  This can only happen if the coils are arranged in the proper oonfiguration.  And after many years of research UFO has finally found that configuration.  I have also tested may different configurations of coils.  And so far the only configuration that I found that works this way is Ufo's configuration of alternating coils.  By inducing voltage into the opposite polarity coils this reduces the input current required to keep the system operating.  Since all scope channels are connected to a common ground the scope is correctly showing that the opposite polarity coils do go below ground when being induced by the active polarity coils.  I hope this explanation helps some,

Respectfully,
Carroll

Many thanks Citfta,

Yes, it has been many years of hard work...that finally render the results...and I am very happy (you have no idea how much) to share it with the World!!

Now, related to the ground for the Scope Probes, yes channels 2 & 3 are definitively using the same common ground from Input.

However, please note that the channel 1, yellow, its ground is connected to the other terminal of secondary...not common to Input ground.

As also, channel 4, because of the diode's connection, is blocking input ground, as it captures exactly the same signal if I just do not connect it to ground, like I have shown on my second video yesterday.

Thanks for all your excellent posts and contributions here my friend!!

Regards

Ufopolitics

Hello @citfta 

I am sorry that I have completely misunderstood your statement on above post (now in bold and underlined by me)
While I was referring to My System negatives, you were referring that All Scopes have a common ground on each probe clips.

Yes, you are absolutely right, so no matter if my Secondary Output is an isolated negative (for the System) the Scope will connect it with all other negatives from all other channels.

So, isn't this an interference? if we are trying to read an isolated signal (like our secondary output terminals) and compare it to another signal that is connected to a negative from a Source (like the exciting system)?

Thanks, and I apologize again.

Ufopolitics

[citfta]

Hi Ufo,

Yes you are correct, I  was referring to all channels being connected to a common ground back at the scope end.  And it is possible they could interfere with the actual signal.  If you want to see if the primaries are actually going below the zero line you could just hook up one scope probe with only it's ground  and signal probe clips connected so that signal would be isolated from all the rest.  Unless your test proves otherwise I am still inclined to believe the "off" primaries are being driven below ground by the "on" primaries because of the mutual induction caused by the movement of the magnetic fields.  No problem with you missing what I meant.  A lot times I don't express myself well.  And I sometimes misread what someone else wrote too.

Take care,
Carroll

PS: I am on hold for a few days as I am waiting for some different microcontrollers.  The Arduino is just not fast enough to get my system up to the speed I believe it needs to be to work properly.  The new ones are supposed to be in next week. I did find some AC caps and that has cleared up my sine wave nicely.

[ggx9]

I sometimes had difficulties when looking at several signals with a scope due to the requirement of the common ground. It would be nice if an oscilloscope had floating grounds for each channel but I have never seen one.
This makes me concerned about how the scope grounding connections may, under some circumstances, interfere with the circuit operation.

[Ufopolitics]

The solution might be easier than we think.
1. A voltage dependant resistor must be fitted at output to protect against self destruction of the device, this will work in conjunction with feed back control mechanism.
2. Feedback can be done using a split output and adding an isolation 1:1 transformer to feed the input the system, this means the more you draw with the load the more you increase the input until voltage dependant resistor will stop the device, preventing overload situation.

At least this is how I see the solution and probably all devices must be designed for certain range power output.

Grounding may help with introducing reference points, earth grounding or air grounding should work fine when proper designed for specific static or mobile applications.

Hello Classic!!

Thanks for this great post!!

More specifically for this part:

2. Feedback can be done using a split output and adding an isolation 1:1 transformer to feed the input the system.

Yes, indeed!!, and it works superb!!

I ordered an Isolation Transformer 1:1 (P=115v:S=115v) and should be here next week.

However, I did some testing with other ratios transformers, and it works beautifully!!

I have Two APC's (Backup Power Supply) and off one of them I took out its transformer...and run my Figuera Generator secondary to its primary...and loaded the secondary of the transformer...and it was great, no voltage drop, as I was able to light a halogen at 1.9 Amps...running with 60V 2.0 Amps Input...while no decay (voltage drop) on the 120V @ Output from secondary at Figuera Generator.

I believe the best tool we can have to check our Generator Performance, is an APC...These things detect the minimal Input AC Voltage drop, in nano seconds, starts beeping and goes on Battery mode...

Now, if we can sustain an APC, then start loading off its multiple AC Outlets...and no beeping...then Game is Over guys!!!

I have added to my Figuera generator some steel plates at places where it needed it, and I had ZERO, none steel before...and still I have to make more plates to add them...and they go in-between Fields and Sequential Coils-Inner Secondary...It makes a HUGE DIFFERENCE!!

********************************

Now I completely understand why Pierre Cotnoir used a SEPARATE Transformer on his setup...to self-feed his system...

Point is that by using a separate transformer, we are not DIRECTLY DRAINING/WEAKENING our main sequencing field through the Inner Secondary...so, it can keep generating power without any disruption to the Field Displacement!!

However, the Side Secondaries (two Coils on each end) does not disturb field movement at all...just the ones located where the Spatial sequencing is taking place.

Next week is going to be definitive...so, hold on to your panties and socks...

This is getting closer to an end People, a "Final Gathering"...

Regards

Ufopolitics

[Classic]

This isolation effect have been explained in first presentation of Don Smith ou device, even if just not enough details provided because people where interested in electrical action/interaction only and totally disregarded magnetic component.

This is why a permanent magnet can perform continuous work while retaining its own energy. We only charge once a specific alloy, which in turn store all the energy in magnetic component and electric conductivity is denied. This is why all the pressure (voltage) is trying to fill any other ferrous with this voltage.

So, if we put 1000 volts in an alloy with 3 elements, let's for convenience (iron, copper nickel), the iron will accept all the charge while copper will say where it can flow easy and nickel will say where not to flow ... this is resistance gradient which will allow the charge to continuously move in the compound with no exist path.

If we fail to observe presence of charge in a permanent magnet, we fail to understand how and why is working.
To "refill" a magnet we need to reapply a charge, as they lose their charge in time or by mechanical shock or termal shock.
A permanent magnet is a self resonant device in my opinion and this self resonance can manifest only as long as there is a charge. mechanical shock will introduce a vibration destroying self resonance and release the energy back into the medium from where belong, while termal shock will derange crystalline structure (canceling resistance gradient) and energy is also released into the medium from where belong.

If we calculate in energy quantity the input into a permanent magnet and quantify in mechanical energy output we can observe overunity.

The difference between a permanent magnet and electromagnet consist mainly in ability to switch on/off this effect.