FIGUERA'S AETHER MAGNETIC FIELDS LINEAR PUMP, REVIVED

kampen · **Today** at 02:34 PM

Hello, dear Ufopolitics,

Thank you very much for message #923.

This additional explanation makes the required series connections and magnetic polarity much clearer.
I now understand your 2–2–2 proposal as follows:
For each Q group, the two identical coils are connected:
END of Coil 1 → START of Coil 2
leaving:
START of Coil 1 and END of Coil 2
as the two external terminals of that complete Q coil.

The important condition is that both individual coils must reinforce each other magnetically, giving:
[N/S] + [N/S]
rather than opposing each other.
Therefore, for a future 2–2–2 arrangement:
Q1 = two series-aiding coils
Q3 = two series-aiding coils
Q2 = two series-aiding coils
and all three complete Q groups must maintain the intended magnetic attraction chain along the core.

I also understand your resistance calculation. With approximately 8 Ω per individual coil, two in series would give approximately:
RQ ≈ 16 Ω
so approximately 8 V would give 0.5 A under steady resistive conditions and approximately 16 V would give 1 A.

Of course, during the switched tests we will also measure the actual coil current waveform, because the inductance and switching timing mean that the current will not necessarily reach the simple DC value during every pulse.

However, after considering your previous clarification about the Main Secondary, I think I would prefer another approach for our first corrected test.

Rather than immediately adding three more Q coils simply to fill the length of our existing Main Secondary, I would prefer to manufacture a new, shorter Main Secondary bobbin and coil, specifically matched to the present:
Q1 – Q3 – Q2
active section.

This will allow us to correct the Magnetic geometry while changing as few experimental variables as possible.
In other words, the first corrected construction will be:
FC1 – [Inner Steel Plate] – Q1 – Q3 – Q2 – [Inner Steel Plate] – FC2
on our 25 × 25 mm square laminated CRNO core, with:
Main Secondary active winding length = total active length of Q1 + Q3 + Q2 only.

I have already prepared the concept for a new shorter Main bobbin.
I will take the actual measurements directly from the Q1/Q3/Q2 assembly before finalizing it, so that its winding section corresponds as closely as practical to the complete active Q-section.

This seems to me the cleanest experiment because we already have extensive reference measurements from the present three-Q-coil system.
After correcting the FC positions and fitting the correctly sized Main, we can repeat the baseline measurements and see exactly what the geometrical correction changes.

Then, after establishing that baseline, we can still build and compare your 2–2–2 series configuration as a separate experiment.

Your clarification regarding FC1 and FC2 is also understood.
They are secondary output coils and are NEVER externally powered.
For the series connection you specify:
END FC1 → START FC2
with:
START FC1 and END FC2
becoming the two output terminals, provided their Magnetic/electrical polarity is such that their induced outputs add.
Before permanently connecting them in series, I would like us to measure FC1 and FC2 individually on the oscilloscope first.

This allows us to verify their relative polarity experimentally. We can then make the series connection and confirm that:
VFC1 + VFC2 adds rather than cancels.

I also understand your recommendation that FC1 and FC2 should eventually be short/narrow coils with low resistance, approximately 2 Ω each or less, using heavier wire, because the induction you expect there is concentrated near the end/front of the moving inducing field.

We already have different FC coils available, so this gives us another useful controlled comparison.
I would prefer to establish the corrected geometry first and then compare the FC versions under exactly the same Q1/Q3/Q2 operating conditions.
Regarding their possible future use as feedback coils, we will certainly measure the available FC output carefully.

Before attempting any feedback connection, I would first like to determine their actual delivered power into a known load and compare it with the total input power of the system.

That way, we have a clear quantitative basis for any later feedback experiment.

So, unless you see a problem with this approach, my proposed sequence is now:
First: correct the physical geometry of FC1 – Q1/Q3/Q2 – FC2.
Second: manufacture a new shortened Main Secondary matched exactly to the active Q1 + Q3 + Q2 length.
Third: repeat our baseline Q1/Q2/Q3 and loaded Main measurements.
Fourth: measure FC1 and FC2 individually, establish their polarity, and then measure them series-aiding.
Fifth: compare the existing FC coils with your recommended shorter, lower-resistance FC coils.

Finally: after we have this corrected three-Q-coil baseline, we can build and compare the 2–2–2 series configuration.
I think this approach will give us a much cleaner scientific comparison because we will know exactly which construction change is responsible for any difference we observe.

Special thanks again for explaining the coil starts, ends, and magnetic orientation so clearly.
This removes another important ambiguity before we rebuild the setup.

Based on your latest clarifications in messages #922 and #923, I have revised the construction drawing again.

See image below:

It now shows the corrected FC1 – Q1 – Q3 – Q2 – FC2 arrangement, the 25 × 25 mm laminated CRNO core, the new shortened Main Secondary, the S/E coil orientation, and FC1/FC2 strictly as induced output coils — NEVER powered.

I have also included your recommended series-aiding connection for FC1 and FC2, with polarity verification before connecting them.

Could you please review this drawing and confirm whether it now represents your intended magnetic structure and electrical connections correctly before we start rebuilding the setup?

If you see anything that still needs correction, please let me know and I will update it before construction.
Many thanks again for your guidance and patience!

Regards,
Alex / Kampen

FIGUERA'S AETHER MAGNETIC FIELDS LINEAR PUMP, REVIVED

kampen