Quote from: Classic on Feb 26, 2025, 11:27 AMIf anyone use the calculator I posted in previous message and keep everything constant apart from resistance may simply observe that powering constant a coil with DC while "modulating" only resistance I can actually modulate magnetic flux without the need to physically change anything else. And virtual magnet is changing its strength or shape defined as MMF (that's why is a magnet) without the need to physically move a real permanent magnet.

Yes, you can "modulate" the magnetic field by just varying resistance, as resistance is INVERSELY PROPORTIONAL to Currents (Amps), so, the MORE resistance you add, the LESS Amps you get, meaning, magnetic field becomes WEAKER...As the opposite if you REDUCE resistance then Amps will INCREASE, and magnetic field would be STRONGER.

Now, related to the GEOMETRY of magnetic field on this type of movement is very simple, when we make field WEAKER it REDUCES in size volume, or SHRINKS.
As when we reduce resistance and amps grow, field INCREASES its Spatial Volume or EXPANDS.

Fine, that was the Figuera's "raw" method, He showed us as an "EXAMPLE" about the main principle his Generator works...

Now, based on my previous explanation above, about field expanding-shrinking its spatial volume, we must realize when field expands-shrinks it does it exactly from its gravitational center to each pole straight alignment...And this Gravitational Center never moves from its location during the expansion-shrinking.

Now, go to Figuera Patent Diagram and observe that the Induced (secondary "y") is in between Two Poles (N-S) but from Two facing coils, which generates TWO Fields that ALTERNATES the operation. This means we are completely wasting all BOTH Fields expand-shrinks on BOTH opposite sides, where there are no secondaries installed.
Just because by using this process of playing with resistance and amperage, the field expands-shrinks BUT ON THE SAME SPACE, from its center (gravitational center from each inducing coil) OUTWARDS through Poles.
The WASTE is about 50% of field movement that only goes to a SINGLE and very small output coil "y".
This is why, after Figuera's death, Buforn proposes another configuration where he created a chain between all inducers-inductors, to use "partially" the other side of fields that were wasted.

So, I have tried about 12 years ago this resistance method, as many people also tried it...it works as it generates output, but it will never be an OU Machine based on this configuration.

IMHO, Figuera just wanted to give us a "hint" on how his main principle was based on, however, this "example" or "circuit config", is NOT the way to succeed generating a self-runner or an OU Generator, building a model that follows this method or even the Buforn one.

In any generator out there, Home or Industrial, the Inducing Field(s) NEVER fluctuates, NEVER reduces its resistance nor its currents, but it keeps its Strength all the time while rotating through secondaries.
If we look just at 'geometries' here, an 'intact' (not fluctuating) field moves through 'spacetime' through inducing coils...and Voltage and Currents are generated perfectly balanced.

And that is exactly what I have shown on my Figuera development topic, except, that I am moving a VIRTUAL Field, however Field is keeping its strength intact through all spacetime movement.
On my development, the Gravitational Center of the Exciting Field also displaces through spacetime, it does NOT stay on the same place!!

We can also refer to this Gravitational Center as the 'Bloch Wall' or as the Counterspace Plane...but that would complicate its understanding.


Ufopolitics

Most interestingly, the only evidence the journalist passed on is that Figueroa's generator provided power for a 20 hp motor (that's 15 kW) and lights in the house. Nowhere is it mentioned that it was self-propelled; rather, it received its primary impulse from a small DC generator that was driven by a water wheel. There is no mention of the input to output power ratio, only that it had no rotating parts other than a mechanical commutator. I've been collecting everything I can find about Figueras' generator.  I even have an acquaintance who does psychological passport modeling. They put in salesmen's actions, interviews, and facial features. The result is a psychological portrait, Figueras is not the person to give something to. The first sale of the patent was at a very high price. Those who bought would not pay for something we can read in the public domain. So the patents we read cannot be the design that Figura sold in 1902. Rather, the first sale only whetted the appetite, so a second patent (more like a proposal) appears in 1908. The system doesn't buy anything twice.  But of course Figura wouldn't put up for sale a technology that doesn't work. So the probability of two working designs is almost 100%.

Autonomous operation has not been documented for Figura0 or even Holcomb - that doesn't mean at all that it's not possible offline. 

Quote from: rakarskiy on Feb 27, 2025, 02:48 PMMost interestingly, the only evidence the journalist passed on is that Figueroa's generator provided power for a 20 hp motor (that's 15 kW) and lights in the house. Nowhere is it mentioned that it was self-propelled; rather, it received its primary impulse from a small DC generator that was driven by a water wheel. There is no mention of the input to output power ratio, only that it had no rotating parts other than a mechanical commutator. I've been collecting everything I can find about Figueras' generator.  I even have an acquaintance who does psychological passport modeling. They put in salesmen's actions, interviews, and facial features. The result is a psychological portrait, Figueras is not the person to give something to. The first sale of the patent was at a very high price. Those who bought would not pay for something we can read in the public domain. So the patents we read cannot be the design that Figura sold in 1902. Rather, the first sale only whetted the appetite, so a second patent (more like a proposal) appears in 1908. The system doesn't buy anything twice.  But of course Figura wouldn't put up for sale a technology that doesn't work. So the probability of two working designs is almost 100%.

Autonomous operation has not been documented for Figura0 or even Holcomb - that doesn't mean at all that it's not possible offline. 

Yes, I agree 100% with above...

And just to add more to it...that I have been writing about for the past 30 years.

A 'Patent' is NOT a "Construction Manual", a Patent is written in the MOST GENERAL WAY it could be done, in order to PROTECT its Intellectual Properties.
The more 'generally written' a Patent is, the more protected against any 'copying' or infringement by just changing a specific parameter and making another Patent.

This 'Rule of Law' on Patents Protection is still applied up to now.

Patents are written to give us a GENERAL IDEA ONLY of how the invented principle works, using the widest form of legal writing available.

It is called "The ESSENCE of" an idea or the plain and simplest way to write it.

When you write the 'Claims' of your Patent, they go from the wider claims to the more specifical ones in numerical order.

And related to Figuera's work, its 'ESSENCE' simply states that we only need to MOVE THE VIRTUAL MAGNETIC FIELD without any real physical movement taking place to generate electricity.

As from above general idea, we can do whatever ways we find more suitable to our advantage.

Regards

Ufopolitics

Back in 2021, I was ready to end my research on electromagnetic generators without mechanical motion. The appearance of Robert Holcomb's generator simply shook me. But back in early 2021, I was convinced that the EMF in a conductor appears when magnetic lines cross it, or at least it should be in the middle of the magnetic flux (the grooves corresponded to this belief) and what is written in all physics textbooks. But, unfortunately, it was mathematics that did not provide the logic of these processes in generators with closed magnetic circuits. My physics teacher in 1978-1982 (a passionate supporter of the law of conservation of energy) said that if a concept has exceptions or contradictions, then it is wrong. The same goes for the theory (concept) of electrodynamics, which is given in the form of a constant.

My research led to my "own discovery" about the phenomenon of EMF in the focus of a closed magnetic flux, it turned out that with [changing the Anapole moment] Anapole - Wikipedia (which was discovered (described) only in 1957, by the Soviet physicist Yakov Zeldovich (from Minsk, Belarus, most likely a Jew by nationality). American version - "Toroidal moment".

I have published everything I learned in my publication: The Invention of the Electromagnetic Generator.

A physicist from the USA directly told me that everything I declare a discovery is well known and is studied by physicists and practiced by engineers to whom it applies. But changing the curriculum makes no sense, since it does not change anything in the knowledge of electricity for 99% of people on the planet. It is easier to train a small part of specialists. In general, logically, no electrical engineer who possesses sacred knowledge will reduce his value as an engineer by telling everyone how he does it for work. Designing electromagnetic generators is the highest level of designing electromagnetic systems. Believe me, I know what I am talking about. If you order a design from any design bureau, you will see the cost of this service. And if the design is innovative, the cost will be even higher.

I updated the article about the first alternator in 1892 by Hippolyte Pixia (although the idea and design belong to Andre Ampère, the customer of the generator).

Hippolytus Pixie's first generator was an alternator. | Patreon

The most striking example of a repetition of the Pixia generator is the "Scooter" generator, which cannot induce an EMF by simply physically cutting the magnetic lines of a conductor.



For the first version of the generator by Clemente Figuera, which he sold in 1902, the most likely version is that the moving rotor with excitation electromagnets was replaced by a fixed rotor with switching of the electromagnets through a mechanical commutator. Figuera, an engineer, had taught physics before moving to the Canary Islands (where he was a forestry engineer) and was well acquainted with all the peculiarities and engineering solutions of the time. Brush-collector switching of the armature, both on the motor side and on the generator side, was the most common engineering solution at the time.

Static Electromagnetic Generators by Clemente Figueras, Robert Holcomb, Jae-Sung Park, and Shoji Haneda. | Patreon

As for the 1908 patent, this version was most likely modified by an engineer for the 1902 patent. To control the change in the magnetic flux in the core, a resistive regulator is used, which ensures smoothness (linearity) of the change in the magnetic flux in the core. The opposite direction of the output voltages in the excitation coils does not allow the phenomenon of mutual induction to form. But there are also some peculiarities, opposite currents in the excitation coils will have the property of heating the windings. In any case, this can only be verified in practice.

GENERATORS CLEMENTE FIGUERA 1902-1908 | Patreon



If the switching of electromagnets in the armature inserted into the stator with windings is fully confirmed, then the option with a resistive regulator in the current model has not yet been implemented. To build with a fixed armature, in any case, engineering design actions will be required, based on all the rules and technologies used in this area. Nothing consumer-grade for the home will come out on the eye.