Quote from: rakarskiy on Nov 27, 2024, 02:08 AMHi UFO!

I absolutely stated that if you take a traditional motor and run it in generator mode, its electromagnetic torque to drive force will be many times greater than the torque if the motor was performing its direct function and vice versa if you take a generator and run it as a motor you will get a motor with poor torque.

Hello Rakarskiy,

Yes, absolutely...and that simply happens because you are running them as INDEPENDENT Machines.
However, on an old Dynamo ran as a Motor, I just did that test, and even at very low speed it has very high torque!!
We can regulate the power delivered to stators and increase-decrease to gain speed or torque.

Quote from: rakarskiy on Nov 27, 2024, 02:08 AMYes theoretically you can do when the torque of the motor exceeds the electromagnetic torque of the alternator. But to reduce the electromagnetic torque of the generator in traditional designs of direct generation, you can not.

This is the problem that we all had for the past 200 years, we have tried to have Motor and Generators to "fight" between each other's in order to have a "winner"...and that is the WRONG APPROACH!!

We have not been able to have any "winners" so far, except for the generator torque over the motor...I have tried that long ago.

The Lockridge approach consists of a "smooth fusion" between both machines within the same housing.

Both Machines are DIVIDED in HALF, but ASYMMETRICALLY, where the generating part COUNTER-TORQUE ASSISTS the Motoring part. As using the BEMF to work on both simultaneously, since both are sharing the same Armature but separated stators for each.

This is not a simple job at all...it requires a LOT of testing on different scenarios.

It requires thousands of CAD Diagrams...until we find the "way"...

Last thing we should lose here is "HOPE"...so, please, do not lose yours!!

Regards

Ufopolitics

Hello everyone!!!

I highly recommend, to study another page of design in electrical engineering as the design of electromagnetic and magnetic circuits. We live in the 21st century and there are many more possibilities for modelling.

HomePage:Finite Element Method Magnetics

Finite Element Method Magnetics:Finite Element Method Magnetics

Quote from: rakarskiy on Dec 01, 2024, 02:28 AMHello everyone!!!

I highly recommend, to study another page of design in electrical engineering as the design of electromagnetic and magnetic circuits. We live in the 21st century and there are many more possibilities for modelling.

HomePage:Finite Element Method Magnetics

Finite Element Method Magnetics:Finite Element Method Magnetics

Hello Rakarsky,

Yes, we are living on the 21st Century...and still we do not have even an Overunity Machine...a simple "self-runner".

Electric Engineers have been using this same Software (FEMM) for decades...however, we still are in the same position as last Century...

All the Algorithms written on that Software have been based on the same traditional magnetism findings that have not led to any recent "great discoveries" on the Energy Systems...like -at least- an OU Electrodynamic Machine.

But I will go a "step further"...

Ask ANY Artificial Intelligence Bot, about making an OU Machine...then see what they will answer.

They will answer the "same rhetoric" that have been used for the last 200 years...why?

Because, whoever wrote those algorithms for the Bots to respond...are -again- based on the "same old" BS...the same 'old rhetoric' 

So, yes, those Programs are great if you want to keep INSIDE the "BOX" that contains all those Machines built since they started and up to now.

If you want to get out of the box, and build an OU Machine...then all those programs are not good for your project.

Sincerely

Ufopolitics

Hello, UFO!

Who's 'we'?  In the USA, for example, the 1951 law has not been repealed. As well as similar ones in other countries, regardless of democracy, monarchy or dictatorship.

If we take, for example, machines with magnetic flux switching, such machines are simply not produced because of the counter system. J. Flynn (USA) was the first person whom the 'system' took under the hood and then destroyed in 2021 without publicity. In the same 2021 in Russia under the guise of COVID19 another engineer Kornilov, who had just finished the development and production of a 70-kilowatt machine, was destroyed. Overnight, a perfectly healthy elderly man was admitted to hospital with the alleged COVID19 and was dead by morning, and the lab was looted. The fact remains that Flynn and Kornilov's online resources became inaccessible at this time.  In 2020, Andriy Slobodyan (Ukraine) tragically died in Korea just as his motor-generator was ready for production. He was spoken to once more on the phone in the evening and by morning he had tragically died in a 5-star hotel. In 2019 in Italy, Turkish magnetic motor inventor Muammer Yulduz organised an online demonstration of a 7.5 kW magnetic generator with his Italian partner. According to my information, at the end of the demonstration they planned to sell a mini-batch of about 30 already completed devices. The system reacted instantly and the audience had a breakdown. The inventor and the Italian jumped in front of the cameras with frightened faces. Then everything was cancelled and the Turkish company's website responded that they were ready but waiting for permission. After the earthquake, the Turkish website simply ceased to exist.   

Second accessibility of information.

Take the example of Clemente Figueroa. You think he wanted to give the world his design without paying? Wrong, just the opposite. Like a normal engineer, he lives his engineering craft and the fact of selling is the purpose of his work. All the actions of patenting without disclosing the principle and details just testify to the purpose of selling. A good friend of mine (psychoanalyst) modelled the reason for his application in 1908, and got a 90% probability that having another version of the solid state convector with OverUnity effect, he decided to sell again. The system decided it was cheaper for them to just follow the 'no man, no problem' rule. If the engineer wanted to give back to the people, he wouldn't have patented it, he would have published it in a magazine and done a public demonstration or otherwise publicised it. Unfortunately, logic suggests just such a development in a tragic way. 

A bit about engineers - designers. This is a very lucrative craft and their 'pluses' will not be disclosed, as the value of their labour will be levelled. As long as all their solutions are in the realm of individual knowledge, the demand for the engineer's services is high. Designing electromagnetic generators is the ultimate in designing electromechanical devices. I have found out exactly what a quagmire in education is exactly for the direction of electrical generation.  

If you generate your own electricity and grow your own food, it is tantamount to printing your own money. So it's a direct threat to the system.

Sincerely. 

Quote from: rakarskiy on Dec 03, 2024, 12:54 AMHello, UFO!

Who's 'we'?

We = We, the People, Humanity, Mankind

Ufopolitics