Hello to All,

This Post is especially dedicated to ALL Builders out there, who are willing to replicate this setup, please READ CAREFULLY!!

Some IMPORTANT Safety Precautions that should be taken in consideration, when testing this type of Generators, that I have been disclosing here.

1- When conducting the "Halfway Test"...or Half Exciter's of Generator, please do NOT get too excited and exceed the Input Voltages!!

Realize that you are RUNNING AN UNBALANCED SYSTEM, where coils are loose inside steel core, as you increase input voltage too much, these Coils tends to get united as ONE SINGLE COIL, then the Magnetic

Forces increase beyond normal circumstances, plus the vibrations, a big difference when we have a FULL SYSTEM, where the other side Group of Sequential Coils COMPENSATE every time with the other EMP.

This Halfway Test is exactly like running at High Speed a Single-Phase Gen with only one Exciter Coil attached (see image below) where vibration is huge, plus a possible burning of the non-working part of circuit is very likely to occur.

On my two Test Videos previously uploaded, I use first 14V, and then 28v... on a PSU that can go up to 60v and 10 Amps...I could have driven this generator at high speeds with much higher Volts/Amps...

to really impress the viewers by "sensational performance"...PLEASE DO NOT DO IT!!

Besides damaging your commutator contact elements by high arcing, you are Pulsing an EMP, that is NOT BALANCED basically, at it's END PEAK by supposedly another OPPOSED EMP that will definitively absorb it!!



2- When performing a FULL TEST, please, also be very careful with any nearby steel tools, or steel loose supplies, like Bolts, Nuts, Washers or razor blades.

So, put away anything of steel, that can be LOOSE and then attracted SUDDENLY & VIOLENTLY to the STEEL CORE and END PLATES when you are using Higher Input Power.

Also, put away any highly sensitive electronic appliances or Instruments, keep them at certain distance from Field Spatial reach.

Also, be careful with the AC Output Terminals from Secondary, please DO NOT UNDERESTIMATE the Power that this System can generate!!

You can get shocked or even killed by the High Amps in AC form at Output...just like touching the AC mains, live and neutral at same time with our hands.

Remember that even One (1) AC Amp can kill a Horse...(said Edison at the War of Currents... )

So, please be safe, take all precautions, before you start adding power to the Input...

I know MANY of You are Highly knowledgeable when it comes on handling high voltage and amperage from AC Mains...however, do not underestimate this setup!

Regards

Ufopolitics

Progress, congratulations!

Can we discuss the rather critical issue of the switch? Other than it having 16 contacts is it a make before break or break before make? If BBM what percentage is off and what percentage on?

Thanks,
Ron

Quote from: ronee on Dec 19, 2023, 12:18 PMProgress, congratulations!

Can we discuss the rather critical issue of the switch? Other than it having 16 contacts is it a make before break or break before make? If BBM what percentage is off and what percentage on?

Thanks,
Ron

Hello Ron, thanks

Yeah, I am not very happy either with only 16 elements, I rather have like 32 or 36...more likely a 36 is perfect, because of what you are mentioning (what % is ON/OFF) 
Like Member Cadman wrote before, doubling the commutators will have a much better timing for the Field to develop properly in eventually all stages, as it Ramps Up (Expanding) and Ramp Down (Contracting).
With 36 elements, I can have 2+2 elements above & below of "brake timing" OFF...or "idle time"...as of right now, there is no time between ON/OFF, actually, because of brush bridging for even a nano sec both elements it sparks (between swap of Sequential Groups)...not much though, now, with the electrolytic cap at the first coils, besides it is preventing from Field to fully Collapse, it reduces sparking a lot.

So, it is a BBM (Brake Before Make) what I want to fully accomplish...the E-Cap will do the job, as "keeping the dipole alive...do not kill it" (Paraphrasing Tom Bearden RIP)

And yes, many times we had this discussion before, about being at "Unison" the movement of Both Fields...as also MBB, but, that did not work out Ron... That was my first test with the first model I built on this second part of getting Figuera back again...connecting it exactly as Figuera had on the 1908 Patent...it does NOT work...Fields somehow cancel...and there is Induction, but poor and nothing like I am showing now.

You and I, and almost everyone involved on this project, knows that the way to go, is by switching with electronics, Banks of FET'S, sequential IC, and the works, a very "elegant" circuit using opto's so the processor does not get fried, etc.

But for now, it is much better to control by a mechanical Rotary switch, while we keep testing basically, the more important thing here...and that is the METHOD of using the Two Fields (per Module) to pump energy out...by Sequentially switched Coils as our Exciter System...

Anyways, stay tuned for next video I am uploading...it is "interesting"...not to say much.

We could discuss it in detail about all these different scenarios, once that I am finished here, I want to show a FULL Exciter System running first, then we can move to a New Topic about Builder's details.

Regards

Ufopolitics

Hello to All,

Ok, here I am showing a Test using a "Second Secondary" which is on the outer spatial part of the Moving Fields, it is just basically to demonstrate, we can also obtain Energy
Generation from this area.

Still Generator, is running with only half, of the Exciter System.

I spoke about it a few pages back...and I am uploading an image now, so you can refresh this "previous data"...



So, what I am testing on this video, is Part "y2" on the image above.

Enjoy the video


Regards

Ufopolitics

Quote from: ronee on Dec 19, 2023, 12:18 PMProgress, congratulations!

Can we discuss the rather critical issue of the switch? Other than it having 16 contacts is it a make before break or break before make? If BBM what percentage is off and what percentage on?

Thanks,
Ron

Hello Ron, again...

I forgot to mention something about what you were referring before.

I am not happy with the way the Sine (if we can call it "a sine" )...it is too sharp, looks more like a spike than a sinewave...I believe the reason of that, is due for having too short of timing ON at commutator for Each Coil on Sequence...at least doubling it with a 32 comm, I believe it will render a smoother wave.

It could be that, or that the brush is too narrow, it barely fully covers the area of just one comm. element...and remember Figuera mentioned "at least brush should be in contact with two elements".

When we have either more contact elements or a wider brush (covering -at least- two elements), each coil would have a longer delay ON, allowing for Field to fully develop...that is what I am basically more concerned. 

Now, before I start making radical changes to controller, which means, taking apart the whole thing...I rather wait until I am finished with the other side, to run a FULL Test...

Cheers

Ufopolitics