FIGUERA'S AETHER MAGNETIC FIELDS LINEAR PUMP, REVIVED

[Kogoth]

Hello. I am observing your work and would like to clarify one question. Do I understand correctly that the final goal of the device is to gain energy from the etheric vortex? With the secondary winding open, the device will operate at idle with little consumption, and when a payload is connected to the secondary winding, the device will be able to produce more energy than is expended on its operation? Will the inclusion of the secondary winding lead to a sharp increase in the consumption of the device? And another question, do you have an understanding of the fundamental principle of the occurrence of excess energy? It's just that, for example, I read the work "Etherodynamics" by Vladimir Akimovich Atsyukovsky, where it was mentioned that any vortex leads to a decrease in entropy (for example, the temperature in the center of a tornado decreases) and this property can be used to re-receive energy in the Carnot cycle. Can you share your thoughts about the fundamental principles of how the universe works?

Привет. Я наблюдаю за вашей работой и хотел бы прояснить один вопрос. Правильно ли я понимаю, что конечная цель устройства — извлечь энергию из эфирного вихря? При открытой вторичной обмотке устройство будет работать на холостом ходу с небольшим потреблением, а при подключении к вторичной обмотке полезной нагрузки устройство сможет вырабатывать больше энергии, чем затрачивается на его работу? Не приведет ли включение вторичной обмотки к резкому увеличению потребления устройства? И еще вопрос, есть ли у вас понимание первоосновы возникновения избыточной энергии? Просто я, например, читал работу Владимира Акимовича Ацюковского «Эфиродинамика», где упоминалось, что любой вихрь приводит к уменьшению энтропии (например, снижается температура в центре смерча) и это свойство может использоваться для повторного получения энергии в цикле Карно. Можете ли вы поделиться своими мыслями о фундаментальных принципах устройства Вселенной? [/size]

[Ufopolitics]

Hello. I am observing your work and would like to clarify one question. Do I understand correctly that the final goal of the device is to gain energy from the etheric vortex?

Hello Kogoth,

Yes, the gain is obtained just from the linearly virtual movement from the Vortex of Magnetic Fields.
Magnetic Fields are the Spatially Presence of Aether in our Dimension, it is like a "Portal" from the Etheric Spectrum, which is in Counterspace.

With the secondary winding open, the device will operate at idle with little consumption, and when a payload is connected to the secondary winding, the device will be able to produce more energy than is expended on its operation?

Yes.
Quote from: Kogoth on 5/8/2024, 2:36:13 PM

Will the inclusion of the secondary winding lead to a sharp increase in the consumption of the device?

Not at all, the Secondaries are just the means to Extract the Energy from the Operation (Movement of the Virtual Magnetic Field) from Exciters Switching.

When we add a Load to the Secondary, of course there would be a Drain from the Inducing Fields, demanding Higher Frequency or Higher Speed to the moving exciting fields.
Then, We just need to "turn the volume up" on an Electronic Board Potentiometer (which would eventually be done "Automatically"), to compensate this load speed demand,..NOT to have a 300 Horsepower Diesel Engine to rev. at over 4000 RPM's, while exhausting black columns of dense smoke to our Atmosphere...DIFFERENCE IS HUGE!!...

Don't you see it?

This is a typical "Action-Reaction" that takes place in any regular two parts rotating generators when a heavy load is added.

And another question, do you have an understanding of the fundamental principle of the occurrence of excess energy? It's just that, for example, I read the work "Etherodynamics" by Vladimir Akimovich Atsyukovsky, where it was mentioned that any vortex leads to a decrease in entropy (for example, the temperature in the center of a tornado decreases) and this property can be used to re-receive energy in the Carnot cycle. Can you share your thoughts about the fundamental principles of how the universe works?

The Fundamentals of Excess Energy lies strictly on the Method(s) we use to Extract it.

So far, the "Methods" we use are too Primitive, we spend too much Energy to obtain Energy...reason why we will never achieve excess on our Output that way.

Here is shown a simple Method, where NOT ANY Mechanical Work is required...just the Virtual Movement of the Magnetic Field Spectrum, through Metals...

The Fundamental Principle of how the Universe works?

To put it simply...it is constantly "recycling" Energy...from one level to another...through many different processes/cycles.

Not enough room here to go in detail.

Ufopolitics

[Ufopolitics]

ANALYSIS ON CONTACTS 1 AND 8 (PEAKS)

Hello All,

On this Point 1, the Sequence Movement of Fields, has reached its Max/End Travel [coming from contact 8] towards ONE SIDE (FIXED POLARIZED FACE) of the Four FIELDS.

1- On F1, the North Repulsion Field (Positive feed Coils) has "clashed" against F1 North Pole.

And here if we go to my previous test videos, here is when the groups of ring coils "bounce back" from the Field they got closer to.

2- On F2, the South Repulsion Field (Negative feed Coils) has collided with the South Pole of F2.

3- On F3, the North Repulsion Field (from opposite Module Positive feed) collides with the North Pole of F3.

4- And finally, on F4, the South Repulsion Field (Neg feed) clashes with F4 South Pole.

So, if you look at these Four Repulsion's Interactions in a DIAGONAL/CROSS Analysis, you will realize this is where the "compensation" or Balance is at.

In a Crossed View Analysis, we see Two South Poles at one side interacting with the Fields South Poles, and a North to North on other side of the cross, upper-lower.

The complete Opposite Movement will take place at Point Eight of the Contacts, reaching the other Side (Polarized Face) of the four Fields:

So, these constants CROSSED REPULSION INTERACTIONS, would contribute to generate a BALANCE of the whole System, as it will reflect on equal Peaks on the AC Sinewave at our Output, since Both Points, 1 & 8 are the Peak/Max reach of Field Travel.

Same way it took place when I was Testing just One Module, Positive Switching and Negative fixed/anchored, where Point 1 & 8 were the Peak Points of the Sequence, measured with my Four Channels Digital Scope.
On a Single Module we have Two Peaks per Full Cycle...

On this Design we have Four Peaks on a Half Cycle and then other Half Cycle we have Four more Peaks. Each Four Peaks, taking place at Unison.

A way more stronger "pumping" of Energy...


Regards

Ufopolitics

[Spagiricus]

Dear UFO,

Thank you for all your work.
I wanted to duplicate your project several times, but the changes (inherent to research work) you made according to the results you had, made me wait. However, I want to make a prototype inspired by your project, and I have some questions. I have "I" transformer cores of various sizes and want to make the smallest functional assembly, and then make a new assembly, of greater power.
1. What are the parameters to take into account to be able to scale the device to any size (power) so that the operation is not affected?
2. Does an electronic switch offer similar results to the mechanical one? Can you suggest a scheme of operation?
3. When switching from one coil to the other, what should be the duration when both are ON, so that the field does not collapse and BEMF appears?

Thanks for all

[Ufopolitics]

Dear UFO,

Thank you for all your work.

Hello Spagiricus,
And thanks for your Donation, I really appreciate it!!

I wanted to duplicate your project several times, but the changes (inherent to research work) you made according to the results you had, made me wait. However, I want to make a prototype inspired by your project, and I have some questions. I have "I" transformer cores of various sizes and want to make the smallest functional assembly, and then make a new assembly, of greater power.

Great!...Yes, Research and Development work have those "inconveniences"...but at the end we will see the results...

1. What are the parameters to take into account to be able to scale the device to any size (power) so that the operation is not affected?

Basically, Voltage and Amperage you want to use AT INPUT, of your smaller device...then it will give you -an approximated value- of the Total Resistance of your exciter Coils based on Ohms Law.

2. Does an electronic switch offer similar results to the mechanical one? Can you suggest a scheme of operation?

Yes, indeed, BUT it must comply with ALL Functions that a Mechanical Switch offers, and then some more at adjust levels we cannot do with a commutator-brush type.

The easier "Scheme of Operation" would be a Logic Circuit, where the basic Switching Signal is generated, then transferred to the Gates of MOSFET'S of rated capability to handle the Voltage and Currents of Exciter System.

MOSFET's are like Electronic Relays, BUT MUCH FASTER, that by sending a very low signal to its Gates it Closes the Circuit between Source-Drain Terminals that handle the Higher Voltage and Amps.

We are working on a circuit like that, however, on this latest development, we need to use P & N Channels MOSFET's (To switch Hi -Positive and Low-Negative Sides at Unison...using the same switching generated signal, in order that by controlling the Main Signal, will control BOTH Channels...and there is a lot of work about that type of design, that has never been done before.

As we do not want to use the Microcontroller driver, since Software always have their issues...and it seems that Electronic Engineers and Software Developers do not get along well...lol.

3. When switching from one coil to the other, what should be the duration when both are ON, so that the field does not collapse and BEMF appears?

Thanks for all

Very minimal, as reduced as possible, Once the next coil is engaged, it must disconnect "right away" from previous one...it is just supposed to be a "bridging very short-timed connection"...otherwise our amps would rise at input, because we have two coils in parallel (resistance goes down/amps rise) for too long.

To give you an idea, on a Commutator and Brush type, the brush should be around the size (width) of a commutator contact segment and max 1.5 (one and a half), I consider double the size is too much (And I know Figuera recommends that), because it may engage for too long previous coil.

Regards Spagiricus.

Ufopolitics