Electromagnetic Generator Theory

[rakarskiy]

By the way, how many talented engineers took part in the Niagara hydroelectric power station project, their engineering and human contribution is simply priceless.

- Nikola Tesla refused his share of the profits, which allowed George Westinghouse to continue implementing the project (in fact, he gave the green light to the company's capabilities) worked on the project;

- George Forbes sold the rights to Westinghouse for the generator idea for a symbolic amount, and continued to work on the project, improving engineering solutions;

- William Stanley (worked in the company transformation and power lines), after the end of the project left Westinghouse and founded his own.

All these people and an even greater number of engineers revolutionized electricity generation. No one shouted at every corner what a genius he was.

[rakarskiy]

It is necessary to delete only those that contradict the very topic of our case (denial of overunity or direct trolling). If a person has a different point of view, it is good, but this person always needs to express his thoughts precisely and completely. If this is not done, it can be attributed to trolling. An incorrect or false concept is not trolling, it is a mistake, and a mistake is also knowledge. Remember Edison's quote about the steps of the experimental search for truth.

My guess about the EMF of induction based on the ANAPOLE  - "anapole moment" when applying elementary logic turned out to be true. In modern physics, this phenomenon was discovered in the second half of the twentieth century, and already has its own name "Dynamic Toroidal Dipole" as a phenomenon emerging from the "Toroidal Moment". I am inclined to the terminology of the original source Anapol - a closed magnetic flux (practically the phenomenon of a magnetic keeper, provided that the magnetic circuit is completely closed) Anapol moment, when - a closed magnetic flux changes its characteristics with the formation of electric polarization in the focus of this changing magnetic flux. How can the flux change only by changing the saturation (magnetic induction) with a subsequent change in the direction of the magnetic flux to change the vector of the electric dipole. As it turned out, in the highest educational institutions of the USA this feature is taught for physicists who are engaged in fundamental research and engineers who are engaged in design. It is called "electrodynamics of electromechanisms with closed magnetic circuits", which is actually any electromagnetic generator with a core in which the winding is wound on rods or laid in a groove.

That's why this isn't taught in all physics courses starting from secondary school, that's a big question.

I recommend reading again my research "The Invention of the Electromagnetic Generator", where I asked myself exactly how and why everything is different.

[rakarskiy]

I made a short video for my article.    Free Energy Ukraine - EMGenerators Static

Yesterday a guy wrote to me who tests different versions of a static generator system (anchor from a DC motor and stator from AC motors). When connecting a load and rotating the brushes around the collector of a statically installed anchor, a stable picture is observed, a drop in excitation current through the brush into the anchor winding. Yesterday he made a module, with an increase in the rotation speed, the brush is pressed harder against the collector lamellas. The effect of the drop in excitation current increased. Moreover, he also recorded a drop in current from the reactance before connecting the load. The drop with the load simply fascinated the guy. The guy, an electrical engineer, tried to convince me that electrical engineering and physics deny the drop in excitation current under load and the arguments of science are correct. I suggested that he measure the excitation current in a regular car generator, but he did not do it then. We argue with him since this publication of mine about the effect demonstrated by Raselli1.

Wise Eye OverUnity: Трансформатор с загадкой - "как"?

[rakarskiy]

Hello, friends!

I will express my thoughts a little about the possible solution of the German engineer in the generator (Lockridge). The main thing is that the researchers never managed to get a working model, and Bedini only expressed a version of a possible principle, but never launched the generator or did not give public information about this launch. This is a fact and start from it. In my practice, I have also seen DC generators and relay voltage regulators on cars. In the 40s of the last century, the simplest DC generators were mainly used, where there were two excitation coils and one pair of brushes.




In the photo (Lockridge) we see that the two coils on the stator have a different wire cross-section. There is also a high probability that they were added to the design as an addition or something was changed (shift relative to the cross-shaped arrangement, as in generators with four coils), probably had a purpose.
Secondly, the anchor that is described had no design changes (we do not know what was in reality).

The main thing is that the device had elements of both a motor and a DC generator, closed in series, and the load was connected in parallel to both the generator and the motor. which worked in self-propelled mode. Increasing the winding on some coils increases both the resistance and the number of turns, which entails an increase in the magnetic induction that the coil forms. Probably the solution should be very simple and ingenious.
The main thing is that if you put the wire in a closed groove of the core, the magnetic flux lines of force will never cut it.

[citfta]

Hello rakarskiy,

Please explain what you mean by this statement "The main thing is that if you put the wire in a closed groove of the core, the magnetic flux lines of force will never cut it." 

I don't see any closed grooves anywhere in the pictures of this thread.  And every motor or generator I have ever worked on in 50 years of experience has always had the wires in a groove.  This allows the wires to be fully imbedded in the magnetic flux that is being induced into the surrounding steel or iron.

Respectfully,
Carroll