Electromagnetic Generator Theory

[Classic]

I never said the electron particle of matter moves, only electric charge which is electronvolt moves in a conductor.

Even voltage is something that many people interpret wrong ! Voltage only represent a potential difference between 2 points where is measured, when we introduce a reference point and we measure from there we can have negative voltage or positive or zero. Everything dead or alive in universe have energy and can be measured if we really want but what is really important is how we use it.

In a Faraday Disk there is no cutting lines, the copper disk can rotate parallel together with permanent magnets and still "generate" electric power !

And magnetic field is uniform and symmetric even if we use asymmetric setups to generate it.

In a galvanic pile the drive energy is from lower potential to higher potential, exactly the opposite of what is "seen" in an working electric circuit (load).

This is how I see it.

[rakarskiy]

From my point of view, electric charge is a linear vector (line of force with spin momentum (spiral shape)). It itself can only be located by having a point from which these vectors are directed. Electric dipole
Magnetic lines of force appear closed in the magnetic flux of the external field
The problem with theoretical physics is the attachment to a point as a basis.
In an electric circuit, a magnetic force line is a transformed electric line, so it can be closed between electric potentials (such as lightning discharging between clouds), or in a ring if the source of EMF is an inductor. But in either case, any magnetic line has a source.
We have no idea what is the source of an electric force line or a magnetic force line (in a magnet), but the source of a force line in a conductor is an electric force line, we do not know what is the source of electricity, we only indicate how and under what conditions it arises.

And why it is not taught, and in fact on this principle work all generators on the power plants of the planet.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toroidal_moment#Magnetic_toroidal_moments_in_condensed_matter_physics

Magnetic toroidal moment and its relation to the magnetoelectric effect
The presence of a magnetic toroidic dipole moment T in condensed matter is due to the presence of a magnetoelectric effect: Application of a magnetic field H in the plane of a toroidal solenoid leads via the Lorentz force to an accumulation of current loops and thus to an electric polarization perpendicular to both T and H. The resulting polarization has the form Pi = εijkTjHk (with ε being the Levi-Civita symbol). The resulting magnetoelectric tensor describing the cross-correlated response is thus antisymmetric.

[rakarskiy]

Good afternoon, friends!
A little bit of mine about that lost Figueroa generator.

Free Energy Ukraine - EMGenerators Static

или на этой площадке

(1) Static electromagnetic generators of Clemente Figueras, Robert Holcomb, Park Jae-Sun and Shoji Haneda. | LinkedIn

[rakarskiy]

Visualization of the switching on/off motion of permanent magnets in a closed magnetic system, a four-phase electromagnetic generator. (Using the example of an external rotor, and an internal stator from Robert Holcomb's patent). https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/WO2021063522A1.pdf



An example of circular inclusion of excitation electromagnets, their switching by solid-state keys, for a DC motor with a magnetic rotor. In fact, the solution is for a two-pole system. No one forbids doing it for four or more poles.

[rakarskiy]

Oh guys, you have too much unrelated stuff in one direction. First, read my article, in which I substantiate my assumption. By the way, the Niagara Hydroelectric Power Station used alternators by George Forbes, not Tesla. Tesla's generators turned out to be very unsuccessful when scaling and large currents on the slip rings caused the structure to catch fire. Forbes proposed rotating the field (rotor with permanent electromagnets) around the stator with phase windings. Moreover, Forbes' patent did not have the same laying of the phase wire inside the stator iron as in the implemented devices. Theoretically, Forbes repeated the concept of the first generator of 1892, described by an unknown person with the letters P.M. in a letter to Michael Faraday. Logic and once again Logic, what could Figuera do, and with the help of an appropriate electromechanical controller, force the rotor electromagnets to switch without physical rotation. Judging from the fact that such machines were widespread at that time, the conversion of the anchor into a phase winding (following Tesla's example at Edison) and the organization of switching the rotor electromagnets on Figuera's controller made a static alternator with very good efficiency. If the management of the world bank buys technology at a price equivalent to 320 kg of gold, do you think that materials describing this technology will be freely available? I just showed that such an option is possible, which is implemented in Holcomb's patent. How you will excite the switching of the static rotor coils, according to Holcomb, using contactless DC motor technology, or a collector-brush unit, is already a matter of choice. The main thing is that the magnetic field of the poles that moves has a constant magnetic field.

Free Energy Ukraine - EMGenerators Static

Generators without physical rotation of the magnetic rotor.