WEAK POINTS -THAT I'VE FOUND- ON FIGUERA’S ORIGINAL METHOD

kampen · Mar 30, 2026, 02:26 PM

Reply to message #41

Hello Ufopolitics,

This is actually a very important point, because Buforn's redesign seems to confirm something fundamental:
Figuera's original arrangement was too localized, while Buforn moved the system toward a more distributed magnetic structure.

That is why I find Buforn's chain concept so interesting.

From my perspective, this does not prove a new induction law, but it does strongly suggest that the correct engineering direction is to move away from isolated two-pole interaction and toward a distributed field system.

In that sense, Buforn's redesign appears to be an intermediate step between:

Figuera's original localized configuration
and
a fuller Linear-Series arrangement

Because once you connect the inducing elements into a chain, you are already moving toward:

better spatial continuity of the field
reduced inactive or weak zones
more uniform coupling with the induced section
smoother magnetic displacement across the structure

And that is precisely why I think Your Linear-Series concept is the right direction.
It takes the same idea further:

instead of relying on just two dominant expanding/retracting regions,
it distributes excitation across multiple positions,
which should produce a smoother and more continuous field displacement.

So in that sense, Buforn's patent can be seen as evidence that even within the historical development of the Figuera concept, the practical path forward was already shifting toward distribution, continuity, and broader field participation.

To put it simply:
Figuera = localized induction concept
Buforn = partial distributed improvement
Linear-Series = logical continuation of that improvement

That is why I believe Your Linear-Series approach is the most coherent technical evolution.

Best regards,
Alex

Ufopolitics · Mar 30, 2026, 04:06 PM

@kampen

Thanks dear friend,

Yes, I think so as well, that the Linear-Series System is a logical continuation of the Figuera-Buforn Design.

As it would get even more corrections when we make it completely a closed, Toroidal Unit System (with very small gaps between elements) like I have shown on the Topic.
Driven by the same Unit, whether it is a Mechanical Rotary Switch or a Solid State Driver.

On a separate note, We must recognize the Figuera's Design as the PIONEER on these Systems Invention and further developments, no matter about all its weak points, Figuera was the ORIGINAL CREATOR.

Buforn got a System that was already conceived and developed by Figuera.

On ALL the previous Buforn Patents (from 1908 to 1910) if you look at them, they are ALL an EXACT COPYCAT of Figuera's Design.

It was not until 1914 (Six Years later) that he came up with the Linear-Series Structural Design.

Regards

Ufopolitics

Ufopolitics · Mar 31, 2026, 02:43 AM

B FIELD MAGNETIC FIELD MODEL FALLACY (ANOTHER CRASH OF THIS THEORY)

Hello All,

Ok, so as many here know, I have been fighting this wrong B Field Unidirectional Vector Model for many years, and I already have uploaded on this Forum a specific video that I uploaded about TEN (10) Years ago...where I prove that a Tool that I built myself, clearly demonstrates that these long B Field Vectors that run all the way -supposedly- from the North Pole to finally "land" on the other extreme of the Field, the South Pole...should NOT made my Tool make the "FLIPS" it did, rightat the CENTER of the Travel...
EXACTLY at the BLOCH WALL Area, which is EXACTLY the Center of the Coil I am testing on video...which is -by the way- an AIR-HOLLOW CORE, so no "Steel Core Magnetic Domains" there...(for those who say that the Bloch Wall is JUST attributed to the Ferromagnetic Domains on the Material).

The Tool I built to make these Tests:

This Tool is very simple to build, without requiring ANY knowledge nor Equipment of a "Machine Shop"...

It just uses Two very small Round Neo Magnets, that I mounted on a Four Points Star, made of a thin steel thin plate. (It must be steel so the small magnets stick to it.

This Steel Four Points Star is mounted on two of its straight points on a Brass Oval Frame, also made from a Brass thin Lamination plate.

I made sure by rounding each of the two ends of this Star (the Rotation Axis) that mount on Brass Outer Frame holes, in order that the Star with the two magnets SPINS Freely, as I show on video.(and to be honest, it is still not good enough, as it tends to stick)

I added a small wrap of wire (once the Two Star's Shaft is mounted) on the interior of the mounting points, this is to prevent any sliding when moving and rotating.

Then I mounted all assembled parts (Steel Four Points Star, Magnets, Brass Oval Frame) on a Brass Round Handle by a small bolt and nut. (so I can angle the Rotating Assembly)

THE TEST

On that Video I made a few tests, like going inside the Hollow Coil...BUT the Test that I want to pay attention on video:

On above Image I am showing the PATH that I am running the Tool with the Magenta Arrow, on OUTER COIL AREA.
The Four Points Star will FLIP EXACTLY withing the Green Area shown on Image.
Note that I am running the Tool positioning the Rotating Axis EXACTLY PARALLEL to the EXTERIOR Field Lines of Force, from North to South and back up.
Please, it is very important to understand this Particular Positioning of the Tool explained above.

You can clearly see on the video that the Tool Four Points Star FLIPS very fast - around its Axis- EXACTLY around the Green Area I am showing on this Image of the Coil. SWAPPING the Polarity to the Opposite.

And Now the short video (only 8:00 Minutes):

Now, on the following CAD Image below, I have reproduced the way the Tool Flipped -in FIVE STEPS (Like in Five Slow Motion Frames)- when traveling along the Field Exterior Lines:

So, here we can see the Five Steps when the Tool Magnets Flips ( I am using Degrees of Rotation for each Step):

At 0º the Two Magnets (forming as ONE FIELD since they are in a NSNS Chain) the South of Tool Field is pointing directly to North of Coil
At 45º Tool Field starts to Rotate as entering Bloch Wall.
At 90º Tool Field is Aligning its Bloch Wall with the Coil Field Bloch Wall in exactly a 90º Angle. (Dead CENTER of Coil).
On the Fourth Step the Tool Field had Rotated around 135º (3/4 turn)
On the end step (180º), the Tool Field has fully Rotated 180º, and now the Tool´s Field North is Aiming Directly to the South Pole of Coil.

Now, -as this B Field Theory states- that the LINES OF FORCE TRAVELS STRAIGHT from the North Pole (without Interruptions) to the South Pole...
There should NOT be ANY FLIPPING of this Tool, EXACTLY at the CENTER of the Magnetic Field.

The Tool Magnetic Field is CLEARLY DETECTING a FIELD MAGNETIC POLE TORSION, EXACTLY at the CENTER of that B FIELD VECTOR.

According to the B Field Theory, these B Field Vectors Travel without ANY Interruptions from North Pole to South Pole.
To ENTER EXACTLY at the FRONT FACE of SOUTH POLE AREA.

If this B Field Theory was RIGHT, then the Tool Field should HAD NEVER FLIPPED from 0º to 180º when PASSING EXACTLY THE CENTER ZONE of the Coil´s Magnetic Field.
If this B Field Theory was RIGHT then the Tool Magnetic Field should have done ONLY ONE FLIP, EXACTLY AT THE END of the South Pole. (Pole Face)

Tool Field South Pole should have kept aligned to the North Pole of Coil during ALL that Linear Travel.
To then Flip 180º when it reaches the FRONTAL AREA of the South Pole.

THERE SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN THIS 180º at CENTER of the Magnetic Field of Coil.

*******************************************************************************

Now, the ONLY MAGNETIC FIELD MODEL that would JUSTIFY this 180º FLIP AT CENTER of the Magnetic Field of Coil, would be the one shown on CAD Image below:

Above Image shows the Model of the Magnetic Field that has been HIDDEN and SEIZED for a VERY LONG TIME, before even Lorentz thought about the B Field Theory development.

The same one that is described on Davis and Rawls Book back on the 1970´s...and revived and deeply developed on Ken Wheeler´s Book "Uncovering the Missing Secrets of Magnetism".

The ONLY WAY that this Tool makes this VERY SHORT FLIPPING from 0º to 180º JUST ON THE BLOCH WALL ZONE, is with this Model shown on above CAD Image.

On this MODEL the North Pole EMERGES from the Bloch Wall, to then RETURN BACK to the Bloch Wall EXTERIOR AREA (Accretion Disk Structure)

And on the SAME WAY takes Place on the South Pole, but at 180º opposite directions.

This Model reveals the well known TWO BUBBLES 3D STRUCTURES for EACH POLE, clearly revealed on CRT, FERROCELL and Magnetic Viewing Films (MVF)

YOU WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO DISTINGUISH THESE TWO BUBBLES ON THE "SPARKLED IRON SHAVINGS" OVER THE FIELD, THAT OBSOLETE AND PRIMITIVE METHOD.

Simply because the Sparkled Iron Dust LOCKS THE FIELDS DYNAMIC FLOW into a MONOLITH SOLID STRUCTURE.

These Magnetic Field Lines are NOT EXACTLY Straight either.

THESE MAGNETIC FIELD LINES OF FORCE ARE SPATIAL 3D CURVILINEAR IN SHAPE, AND NOT STRAIGHT.

Their 3D Curvilinear Pattern could be seen ONLY under the FERROCELL LENS. (NOT on MVF nor on CRT)

Meaning that they DO NOT EMERGE AND ENTER back to the Bloch Wall on an exactly Linear Alignment.

I am going to Build a MUCH BETTER TOOL than the one shown on Video...

This time I will build a GYROSCOPIC TYPE TOOL, which will have more than One Rotation or like used on "Robotic Terms" ... with MANY "DOF" (Degrees Of Freedom) Rotation...This way the Tool´s Field will Capture and Reveal the Curvilinear Nature of ALL these Magnetic Lines of Force...

Regards

Ufopolitics

kampen · Mar 31, 2026, 03:33 PM

Hello dear Ufopolitics,

I am just reflecting to your latest posts and had a thought I wanted to share with you.
I see that you are now planning to build a more advanced gyroscopic-type tool to further investigate the magnetic field behavior.

While I understand your motivation to explore the field geometry in more detail, I am wondering whether this is the best use of your limited and valuable time at this stage.

From my perspective, the most critical step right now is still the completion of your mechanical commutator system and obtaining clear measurement results.

That experiment would directly address the core question we have been discussing for so long, and it would provide concrete evidence that could move the entire discussion forward in a decisive way.

The field behavior investigations are interesting, but without measurable system-level results, it may be difficult to translate those insights into a working machine.

So I am just wondering whether focusing your effort on finalizing the commutator and running the tests might be the most effective path forward right now.

We are genuinely interested to see the results of your linear system, and I believe that is where the real breakthrough will become visible.

Best regards,
Alex

Ufopolitics · Mar 31, 2026, 05:05 PM

Hello dear friend,

Do not worry, I know exactly well what our priorities are.

And definitively I am FIRST going to finish the Commutator Assembly then make all required Tests.

That is number one (#1) on my "priorities list".

The Magnetic Gyroscopic Tool would be a much longer time process...as it requires a lot of starting steps (like CAD Designs) which I have not even started yet...

So, again, do not worry, I will get my Linear-Series Setup finished first.

Regards

Ufopolitics