WEAK POINTS -THAT I'VE FOUND- ON FIGUERA’S ORIGINAL METHOD

[Ufopolitics]

SYMMETRICAL FIELD EXPANSION APPLIED TO FIGUERA'S 1908 PATENT

Ok, so to finalize this 'Chapter' on Field Expanding-Retracting Symmetrically from its dead center...now let's apply it to the way Figuera conceived his Electromagnets:

FIGUERA'S 'N' ELECTROMAGNETS EXPANDING:

On above image over the original Figuera's Patent drawing we see ALL 'N' Electromagnets are on the stage of Expanding over the Secondaries 'y'.

On above image over the original Figuera's Patent drawing we see ALL 'S' Electromagnets are on the stage of Expanding over the Secondaries 'y'.

Then, later on time (after the passing away of Figuera) Buforn redesigned the whole structure, creating a Chain, and therefore using all the Rear Pole expansions that Figuera missed.

Except, of course, for the Two ends of Buforn Linear Chain, of the total of N & S Electromagnets.

Regards

Ufopolitics

[Ufopolitics]

[...]

Then, later on time (after the passing away of Figuera) Buforn redesigned the whole structure, creating a Chain, and therefore using all the Rear Pole expansions that Figuera missed.

Except, of course, for the Two ends of Buforn Linear Chain, of the total of N & S Electromagnets.

Regards

Ufopolitics

BUFORN PATENT 57955 (1914)

Hello All,

Ok, so as I have quoted my previous post on just the Buforn Patent...it was finally granted on 1914, six years after Figuera's death...

Where Buforn introduced the new concept to add all N & S (Inducing Electromagnets) in a Series Chain with the Induced 'y' in between them:

And below is a detail with Buforn explanation about this change:

It is understood that this "improvement" to Figuera's Original 1908 Patent utilizes BOTH Poles of each Inducing Coils (N & S) whenever making their expansions-retractions (except the end ones)
Another one of Figuera's Weak Points resolved later on by Buforn.
If you all note Buforn also added a CENTER Element here, 'bridging between N-y-S, which I believe is referring to the Steel Core Bridging from Pole to Pole.

Credits and Images provided from https://figueragenerator.wordpress.com/:
Buforn Patent at: https://figueragenerator.wordpress.com/patents/patents-by-buforn-post-1908/

Regards

Ufopolitics

[Ufopolitics]

THE B-FIELD FALLACY (HOW SUCH WEAK & UNREALISTIC MODEL HAS SURVIVED FOR SO LONG?)

Hello All,

I would like to go back to the B Field Concept since "Lorentz Force Theories" were "officially" accepted by the Sciences Academia by 1895-1897.
So, within the "Package" of the "Lorentz Forces" came along this Model about the Magnetic Field...it seems that without this Magnetic Configuration, all other theories (or the ones related to magnetic forces), would not "square out"...

If You search for : B FIELD ON MAGNETIC FIELDS...

You will have THOUSANDS of Images, where ALL OF THEM shows that the DIRECTION and STRENGTH of ANY MAGNETIC FIELD has adopted a UNIDIRECTIONAL FLOW, or ONLY from SOUTH TO NORTH:

And below is just one of the Thousands and Thousands of Images that I chose randomly...

So, according to this Model, -which obviously COMPLETELY IGNORES the EXISTENCE of a BLOCH Wall- clearly shows that ONLY A "UNIDIRECTIONAL FLOW" of DENSITY & STRENGTH (VECTORIZED BY B & H FIELDS)

For this Model, the SOUTH POLE is actually NOTHING, just considered as a RETURN ZONE of this "UNIDIRECTIONAL FLUX" , "A SUCTION SOUTH POLE"...where there is NO STRENGTH WHATSOEVER.

This Model is portraying the Magnetic Field as a "MONOPOLE FLOW"...Even though this same "ACADEMY SCIENCE" does not approves there could EVER BE the EXISTENCE of any "MAGNETIC MONOPOLES"...
On that Image above...can you notice 'they' do NOT even mention the "Strength" of South Pole?...Just the North (as being the "stronger Zone") and the CENTER as being the "weaker one"...LOL

CONTRADICTIONS GALORE!!

As the "JUSTIFICATIONS" they cite are completely NONSENSICAL:
Like that small compass shown...at the North and at the South Pole...

• Of course that Compass is going to point its N to the South Pole, BECAUSE ITS BEING ATTRACTED TO IT!!
• As also that same Compass is going to show POINTING it's North AWAY FROM NORTH POLE on the Field, simply because compass SOUTH POLE is being ATTRACTED TO THAT NORTH on the Field!!

And so, Academy "concludes" (based on this compass behavior) that is showing all of us, the  "North B Field Flow"...or the "NORTH FLUX DIRECTION AND DENSITY"...

What I really can NOT understand, is why this completely wrong, UNREAL Theory & Model, has lasted for 100 plus years?

WITH ABSOLUTELY NO ONE CHALLENGING IT?

Just a very simple question, from any Student on the Classroom to the Professor teaching this Fallacy...:

Professor, can you explain why whenever we approach Two South Poles they still REPELS and AS STRONG as the North to North?

And if the Student shows this image...would be the "TOTAL NIGHTMARE" to the Professor:

I am pretty sure the professor will EVADE this answer...simply because this Theory can not back it up.

And, specifically on this Post...If anyone have this explanation...please, you are very welcome to respond it here.

PD Note: This is Just ONE of the MANY OTHER WRONG TEACHINGS that have avoided from anyone -so far- to be able to build an "Overunity Machine"...
If our Concepts about the Real Magnetic Field have been taught SO WRONG, for over 100 + Years...how could we ever build one?

Sincerely

Ufopolitics

[Ufopolitics]

Hello All (again)

So, according to this UNIDIRECTIONAL FLOW (FLUX)...it should mean that:

• Whenever we EXPAND this Field by increasing Voltage and Currents...
• It "should respond" as ONLY THE NORTH POLE to be SPATIALLY EXPANDED?
• That ONLY NORTH POLE will INCREASE ITS STRENGTH?
• Where the SOUTH POLE will just INCREASE ITS "SUCTION FORCE" (NEGATIVE FLOW)..or ITS RETRACTION FORCE?
• An ASYMMETRICAL EXPANSION of the Magnetic Field?
• Where we have a "POSITIVE STRONG FLOW" on NORTH, as a HIGHER VACUUM- SUCTION-NEGATIVE FLOW on SOUTH?

Do this make sense -at all- to anyone?
It is completely "Surrealistic".

¿...?

Ufopolitics

[Ufopolitics]

B FIELDS FALLACY...(CONTINUED)

Hello All,

Ok, so I wanted to know how they possibly "fix" this huge mistake betwen South Poles REPULSION using the UNIDIRECTIONAL Flux...and the Graphic Image is astounding:

And here we go on the South to South Repulsion, based on B Field Theory:

Even though the FLOW CIRCULATION there shows that a VERY CLEAR and STRONG ATTRACTION MUST TAKE PLACE...they "FORCE" this image as we "must believe" this flow will "result" (like Magic) on a Repulsion.

It is VERY obvious that for the North Repulsion this Ridiculous Model will "hold"...or "Pass" because:

• It clearly shows the Two B Fields Vectors OPPOSING each others.
• Right from the center of Field North Pole.

But when we go to the South Repulsion...

• ALL LINES ARE CONVERGENT exactly to EACH CENTER of the Two South Poles.
• Indicating a very Clear INWARDS OR SUCTION FORCE between the Two South Poles.

That according to ALL PHYSICS LAWS that involves ANY "Flow" and a "Force", whether Hydraulics or Pneumatics, it will show this SCHEMATIC as an ATTRACTION.

• Is like connecting Two Vacuum Hoses together..they will stick together automatically.
• Or Two Hydraulic Fluid hoses coming from the end that Pump has a Negative Force, or a SUCTION.

But "it sems" that for these type of "Magnetic Flows" it works completely opposed to any other Physics Laws.
Or obviously, they are forcing us to believe "it must be so, period!!"...and please, NO questions asked because I will suspend your Magnetism Test!!

Ok, so I asked "AI" How is justified the Repulsion of Two South Poles using the B Field Model?

And here is the answer:

So, breaking down those answers:The very first paragraph response is wrong:

The repulsion between two South (S) poles is justified by the behavior of the magnetic field (B field) vectors, specifically their direction, vector addition, and energy states

Sorry, but the "behavior of vectors" does not justify this 'Stunt'
If we go based on 'Vectors Laws' as having same magnitude, but Linearly Opposite Directions, then there would not be an addition, but a subtraction, resulting in Zero.

1. Vector Direction and Inflow
Magnetic field lines are defined as entering a South pole and exiting a North pole. When two South poles face each other, the B field vectors from both magnets point toward their respective poles. Because they are pointing toward each other from opposite directions, they are "head-to-head" in the space between the magnets.

Negative,

• These two vectors are NOT "head to head" (understanding as the "vector's head" as the FRONT or their Arrow direction, as there is the Max Force).
• These two South B Field Vectors are facing "Origin with Origin", and we all know the Origin of a Vector is an Inertial Point. (No Force there)

2. Vector Field Superposition
The total magnetic field at any point is the vector sum of the fields from each magnet.

If such statement above is true, then how can it be justified that at the center "point" of the Magnetic Field (where ALL vectors are -supposedly- traveling back to South Pole)
All those vectors there (on a 360º 'BELT' around Field) they are ALL in a "Low force zone" at the very center of all those "returning vectors"?
The "Real and Simple Answer" is:

• Because that's where the Bloch Wall is located, as BOTH Poles are emerging from that Zone, as the COMMON ORIGIN on that "Lower Force Zone".
• But they do NOT want to admit that Fact, their "Return Flow" from North to South MUST BE on a Straight Flow, "no Interruptions there"...

Cancellation at the Center: At the exact midpoint between two identical South poles, the vectors are equal in magnitude but opposite in direction. This causes them to cancel out, resulting in a zero-field point (neutral point).

That answer is incomplete: 'the vectors are equal in magnitude but opposite in direction'
The Two Vectors (of Two South Poles according to B Field Theory) are in opposite direction', (that part is correct) BUT NOT HEAD TO HEAD, instead, those two vectors are facing on their 'INERTIAL, ORIGIN POINTS', this fact will force these two vectors to cancel out to zero, BUT on a Mutual Attraction.
However, on Magnetic Fields this will NOT cause a "Zero Field Point".
But the opposite, the same as a North to North Repulsion, at its center would be a High Energy Density Field

Bending of Lines: Because field lines cannot cross, they must bend away from this neutral point. This bending creates a "compressed" field in the surrounding space, which manifests as a repulsive force as the lines push against each other.

So, here lies the final 'core' explanation...their repulsion is "justified" based on the Outer Lines of Force facing each others.
They "nullified" the center to a "neutral point", zero field force.

Again, this is completely wrong.

If this would be real, by simply approaching two South Poles, it will drastically cut off the Flow back to North, as BOTH North B Field Vectors will drop in force.

• We have "neutralized" the Main Center Flow.
• The now "returning outer lines are FULLY CUT, and 'entertained' now on facing each other's for that "Mutual and Exterior Layer Repulsion".
• While ALL Flow back to N Pole will simply collapse.

If this would be true (Cutting the Strength and Circulating Flow of both North B Field Vectors), we would not have any issues to build a fully operational Permanent Magnetic Motor.

The Real Fact, is that Each Magnetic Pole is completely INDEPENDENT from each other's.
Both Poles (N & S) originates on the Bloch Wall.
Then BOTH POLES on SEPARATED PATHS Return back to their COMMON ORIGIN (The so called BLOCH Wall)
On a PERFECT NATURAL SYMMETRY. 

3. Potential Energy and Gradients
The universe naturally moves toward states of lower potential energy.

Increasing Field Density: Pushing two like poles together forces the magnetic field lines into a smaller volume, which increases the magnetic energy density (proportional to
B^2).

Yes but not "the Universe", (that's too general, obviously not looking for a confrontation)
Correct Interpretation:

• Higher Potential Energy Fields moves toward Lower Potential Energy Fields.
• Simply, Direct and Elegantly put...

Force Direction: Since the system wants to reach a lower energy state, it exerts a force in the direction where the field (and thus the stored energy) decreases. This pushes the two South poles away from each other.

If "the System" wants to reach a "lower energy state"...it will "automatically" direct itself towards that CENTER INTERSECTION of those Two South Poles, where previously they "declare it" a "No Field Area" or a "Neutralized-Nullified Zone" where there is absolutely VERY LOW POTENTIAL ENERGY.

But according to this "justification" they want "to steer by force" these Higher Potential Return Lines against "other Higher Potential Return Lines".
So, now considering both outer Return Lines of Force of "lower decreased fields".

Then now, these "Two decreased Fields are "struggling" to sustain a South to South Repulsion?

However, they mentioned on the first paragraph: "The universe naturally moves toward states of lower potential energy..."
So, it seems that now "the Universe changed his mind"...

Nature as the Universe, never make mistakes...Magnetic Fields are purely Symmetrical Systems...as all Nature and Universe "drawings"...
They are trying to portrait the Magnetic Field in a Fully Asymmetrical Structured way (to fit their purposes)...Sorry, but Nature does not work like that.

Regards

Ufopolitics