Introduction to the SFT

[Prajna]

Well, well, well. Cambridge University's Naked Scientists forum just deleted a thread about my device after it had been running for perhaps two weeks. None of their 'naked' scientists wanted to look at the geometry and magnetic fields in the device, rather they just dismissed it and when I questioned their dogma they said they were not dogmatic, they were open minded and no scientific laws are certain, all are open to be disproved or improved with sufficient empirical evidence. And then they deleted the thread. Very open minded. Not.

[Classic]

I have seen this patern before on different forums, where such topics have been hidden from public eyes without any explanation, not even mentioning that is working or not ... maybe the same people

[Prajna]

Well it turns out that they had not deleted the topic, just moved it to the 'speculative' section of the forum without telling me. Bad manners rather than bad faith. They are still not addressing particulars but rather taking the tack of "work it out yourself." The reasons for that are open to speculation too.

[Classic]

This is very kind of you to add the correction. Many thanks.

When I have been challenged about my theories I had to show up my working models, even if they are not yet the final product.

[Prajna]

No problem, @Classic, I like to be fair. I have released all the information about my device and the history of how I got here. Anyone is free to clone my repo and build and test the device themselves.