FIGUERA'S AETHER MAGNETIC FIELDS LINEAR PUMP, REVIVED

[Ufopolitics]

Hello emiboom2,

I think the decreasing output is being caused by the wire connection scheme. If you look at each exciting coil as a resistor, the amperage per coil decreases as each coil is added to the input current.
If the coils are wired in parallel, with each coil having it's own negative wire to ground, they are wired as a parallel resistor circuit. If the coils are wired in series then the resistance increases as each coil is added to the input.

The way to make each added coil equal in intensity would be to insure each coil receives the same constant amperage as each additional coil is activated.

BTW, I don't think core saturation is a factor at this time.

Regards
Cadman

I agree 100% with above, that is why I came up with the series-parallel circuit, which is working fine so far.

Yes, the ideal way would be that each coil on the sequence receive the same current (amps) on the switching...however, always resistance, for minimal it would be, it keeps adding the more coils we add to sequence.

Now, I have also tested this circuit with all coils in FULL parallel connection, and it works, but induction output decreases...why?

Because, we no longer have a "magnetic trail" behind all the coils which are turned off...so, we are collapsing fields on the trail...and Field only prevails/exists for the last coil turned on.

There are many possibilities here to be tested...but, what we do not want to do, is to collapse field(s) in the middle of the sequencing travel path.

Regards

Ufopolitics

[Ufopolitics]

Hello,

One more thing to add on my above post...and that I consider as very important!

As we add resistance every time, we add a coil into the sequence...we also add INDUCTANCE to the whole sum of added coils, as we not only are adding turns to the sequence, but we are also adding steel core  mass length, gain.

That is the reason why, I want to keep all coils on sequence with lowest resistance as possible, and as many turns as we can, and that is only obtained by using a higher gauge wire...so the resistance adding is not comparable to the inductance adding, and still, have majority of turns added.

Remember that Inductance is increased, not only by adding more turns, but also by adding more steel mass to coil(s) core being measured.

IMHO, this is the basic "gain system mechanism" here.

Regards

Ufopolitics

[Ufopolitics]

Hello to All,

Ok, I finished yesterday, winding all the rest of the Four Coils...

I made a short video to show the configuration, and the way to install them on secondary...

The BAD NEWS here, is that after setting up and running the way I showed connections on the video (with diodes, all end of coils to negative, all start terminals of coils go to commutator terminals and diodes in between, as shown previously)...

Well, running just "halfway" this connections work great, as you all saw it on video...but once that I hooked all eight coils...Input Amperage ramp up SkyHigh...

Plus, each group when is off, is getting Induced by the other sequence running...of course, induced currents are AC...and this fact, disrupts Induction at Secondary Output.

The Good News...is that it works just fine, with the previous, original Series Connection that I have also shown here...Not as great as when I did just one-half exciter with diodes though...

But the way the coils are set, is the same as shown on video...except that we attach the end of first (N1) with Start of #2...end of #2 attach to Start of Number 3...and so on...the start of N1 attach to negative.

I am showing that image with connections below:

I have to work around a new connection way, that it is not the Parallel type, but it activates the sequence coils more evenly.

I have to make some modifications to the steel core ends, because now all sequential coils are a bit larger than secondary plus core length...

But I will try to get a video running tomorrow...

By the way, the sinewave I am seeing now on Scope Output...looks like an "h"...kind off.

Sorry I have not been that active here, because I have been working on the bench a lot.


Regards


Ufopolitics

[rakarskiy]

Hello UFOpolitics!
Try to solve the problem, through two coil units working in opposition to the magnetic flux in the core. This is a traditional solution in magnetic systems.
Output / collector windings can be connected in series.
Regards!

[Sandy]

Hello,
One more thing to add on my above post...and that I consider as very important!
As we add resistance every time, we add a coil into the sequence...we also add INDUCTANCE to the whole sum of added coils, as we not only are adding turns to the sequence, but we are also adding steel core  mass length, gain.
That is the reason why, I want to keep all coils on sequence with lowest resistance as possible, and as many turns as we can, and that is only obtained by using a higher gauge wire...so the resistance adding is not comparable to the inductance adding, and still, have majority of turns added.
Remember that Inductance is increased, not only by adding more turns, but also by adding more steel mass to coil(s) core being measured.
IMHO, this is the basic "gain system mechanism" here.
Ufopolitics

Hi Ufopolitics,
Relating to the increase of inductance being a "gain system", I agree that both mathematically and in practice, energy can be synthesised and destroyed by synchronous parameter variation. If this path is to be pursued, according to my understanding, inductance  needs to decrease over time (per cycle) to create/cohere energy and likewise energy will be destroyed if inductance increases over time in relation to a cycle.
In simple terms, a coil needs to have some current flowing in it, then have its inductance reduced before the current stops flowing. Then it will release more energy than it took to make initial current flow. How to do this without spending the same amount of energy to change the inductance? I don't know!
 I have tried to get OU with mag amp topologies and I saw energy being "created and destroyed" in the output windings but also in the bias windings of the mag amp, and energy was always conserved, even though no "induction" was taking place.
There is a thread at energetic forum which went nowhere but contains mathematical formulas for parametric excitation.
Link is here if anyone interested.

http://www.energeticforum.com/forum/energetic-forum-discussion/renewable-energy/5980-parametric-excitation

Please delete this post of it is distracting the thread.
Wishing you success in your experiments!
Kind regards, Sandy[/quote]