FIGUERA'S AETHER MAGNETIC FIELDS LINEAR PUMP, REVIVED

[Ufopolitics]

ANALYSIS OF THE SIGNALS PLUS SCOPE SPEC'S ON LATEST TESTING

Hello to All,

Below is an Image taken of the Scope Signals, while I was performing the latest Test:

And below is the same image, where I have added all the Specifications Highlighted for the Analysis:

Ok, so first:

The running Frequency is at 31.12 Hertz/ Sampling Frame Time Capturing is at 20 milliseconds (20.0 ms)

1- I have set a Green dotted line for Zero-line level.

2- I have set Horizontal lines to define each of the Peaks for all sines.

2a- Red dotted Lines are set for All Negative Signals (below zero)

2b- Yellow dotted line for Positive Peak Output.

2c- Light Blue dotted line for Both Input Sines.

3- Scope Channel Settings are:

3a- All Three Channels are set EQUALLY at 5.0 Volts per each square on Screen Grid at Scope Spec's.

3b- All Physical Scopes are set at 10X (set at each Scope Probe Switch)

All these settings on Scope and Probes were done in order that Signals do not exceed screen size.

Basically, this Analysis is NOT AT ALL, about discussions if Output Signal on Scope is "bigger" or "Greater" than both Input Signals...NOPE!

What I would like to point out, I basically did it, at the previous video, with the observation of the Sequential Coils floating back and forth...

But, adding here a deeper analysis about the Two Input Signals shape and form...

First, I want to clear up something I said WRONG at previous video...and that was that the Input Signals "Collapse"...no, they do not!!

Both Input Signals SMOOTHLY fall over time -NOT in a steep, vertical line, like a typical "collapsing" takes place- to the point that the ASCENDING other Signal CROSSES at a specific timing, and at a precise, repeated, perfectly defined LEVEL, which I called "Overlapping or Crossing Points-line" (not shown on image)

On the Physical Sequential Coils Assembly, this Crossing Point should take place around the EXACT CENTER of ALL Seven Coils, IF, All Coils are SECURED AND TIGHT.

And for this latest Video, all sequential Coils were loose...so this crossing points-line, was like "floating" back and forth...and even so, they still show a consistent alignment.

The Resistance that each sequential coil has, is the main cause for this smooth ascending and fall of the Input Positive Sine Signals. However, when they reach the End travel of each displacement FALL, is when the sum of ALL Coils resistances involved on the fall, leaves a NEGATIVE Trace, below zero.

We can interpret this under zero signal as a PARTIAL COLLAPSE (not a full collapse, since none of these coils ever turns off) and I see it as a Magnetic Field Inertia reversal, where after it was fully powered, it starts losing currents, because the adding of subsequential coil's resistances on the series connections...then it "tends to reverse"...but it never does...it is just like a "less Northern Polarization" than previous one, when it was fully powered, without any resistance because brush was directly feeding it.

And honestly, on this point, is where the Two Input AC Caps that I have installed at both input points [1 & 8] play a decisive role, as not allowing the Field and so the Signal, to fully drop on the negative side.

If I take these two caps off, the negative spikes at input, would be galore during the operation.

Finally, a question that I even asked myself at certain point...as is:

Why if there are Two Positive Input Signals...the Secondary Coil delivers such a neat, clean, AC Sinewave, that goes precisely the same height point level, to Positive Peak to Negative Peak passing by zero line?

First, what the Scope Probes at INPUT receives, are simply Two Positive Signals, NEVER FULLY Negative (except by the Inertial Field small travel), so it reflects exactly what they "scope" on the screen.

Input Scope Probes do NOT capture the TRAVELING SPATIAL DIRECTION of those Two Positive Signals in real, physical world coordinates, related to our setup.

Much less the Scope Probes "know" that Both Signals are COMPLETELY OPPOSED ONE TO EACH OTHER'S on Real World Coordinates...

But our extended Inner Secondary Coil, which is expanded along both opposed traveling Input Signals does.

For the Secondary Coil, it is a FULLY and DEFINITIVE Positive and Negative Field Displacement along its windings...and so, the Yellow Probe connected to its terminals reads exactly what is going on...a Positive and then a Negative sinewave.


Regards to All


Ufopolitics

[Ufopolitics]

Hello again...

I can never stop thanking Ken Wheeler's book about Magnetism.

It really makes you "see" beyond the invisible...basically, when it comes to helping visualize the Magnetic Field.

But, there is more to it...like when he refers and DEFINES, the only Two Interactions existing on Magnetic Fields...Attraction versus Repulsion:

Image taken from  Uncovering the Missing Secrets of Magnetism (Full Read Onsite PDF) - Page 4 (overunitymachines.com)

Page 4, Post 15, Image number 4 scrolling down: 

REPULSION: Far right are two likewise spin fields causing deflection; this is mirror membrane Ether deflection, this is literally extremely high-pressure space,

ATTRACTION: whereas the middle picture is a negative pressure counterspatial voidance sink.

Since the center picture is diagramming the Ether returning to counterspace, that picture is showing the formation of the new dielectric inertial plane between two inverse spin fields and two separate magnets about to become one single magnet.


Ufopolitics

[Fessor]

Hi Ufopolitics,

it's a surprisingly smooth and nice sine out, and seems to be a prof that bloch-displacement/pumping into secondary occur completely as anticipated by you, what an accomplishment!

What primary factor do you think could lay behind the voltage drop seen on secondary under load?

To analyze the voltage drop on secondary at load, one could try to make a 5 point graph showing power in and out respectively at different voltages and loads, simply to recognize the pattern for around where there seems to be a breaking point (if any), could maybe reveal some and also become a reference point for further improvements in the balancing and core material/structure.

I am still amazed, so well done.

Sincerely
Fessor

[Ufopolitics]

Hi Ufopolitics,

it's a surprisingly smooth and nice sine out, and seems to be a prof that bloch-displacement/pumping into secondary occur completely as anticipated by you, what an accomplishment!

What primary factor do you think could lay behind the voltage drop seen on secondary under load?

To analyze the voltage drop on secondary at load, one could try to make a 5 point graph showing power in and out respectively at different voltages and loads, simply to recognize the pattern for around where there seems to be a breaking point (if any), could maybe reveal some and also become a reference point for further improvements in the balancing and core material/structure.

I am still amazed, so well done.

Sincerely
Fessor

Hello Fessor,

Thanks.

What primary factor do you think could lay behind the voltage drop seen on secondary under load?

There are two factors required on the Exciting System (primary)...the first one, we have achieved so far...it is Output Voltage gain above input...
The second one is amperage gain...I am still working on that one, even though I have played with it in the past, and I have shown that video on this topic.

The "gradual stepping" of Sequential Fields, increases voltage over time...while the fast impact, (short timing) causes amperage gain.

We have to "mix" both on the same "menu"...

You will see it soon.

Regards

Ufopolitics

[Ufopolitics]

There are two factors required on the Exciting System (primary)...the first one, we have achieved so far...it is Output Voltage gain above input...
The second one is amperage gain...I am still working on that one, even though I have played with it in the past, and I have shown that video on this topic.

The "gradual stepping" of Sequential Fields, increases voltage over time...while the fast impact, (short timing) causes amperage gain.

And expanding a bit on my above comment, the best is to explain based on the way a "Pump" works...

If the -not loaded- Pump, is rising pressure enough, keeping it steady, that is great...BUT, if, whenever we put a pressure load, pump pressure drops beyond spec's...

Normally, this is due to a leak somewhere on the high-pressure circuit, that comes up only under load.

Or it could be that the pressure built, at no load, did not have the enough force/strength to hold at load.

In our case, Voltage is the pressure...but Amperage is the Force of that pressure.

Balancing both, pressure and force, will deliver a low voltage (pressure) drop, under load.

Please, do not get confused here...there always, would be a "pressure drop" on any system whenever you add a load, that is when the "prime mover" steps in, to rise the speed, frequency or torque.

we just need to reduce that drop to minimal spec's or keep it on the lower percentage side.

Regards

Ufopolitics