Electromagnetic Generator Theory

[rakarskiy]

I could go on and on about those who are already dead or gone. But that won't please anyone, it will only scare them. 

The very first time the system (the coal lobby with the nascent oil lobby) opposed free energy technology that could change the world back in the late 19th century was - Keele's ethereal steam generator.  Generator (Keely) – AnthroWiki

At the expense of evidence? Everyone has to make their own choice. I'm not new to electricity, but I've had to rethink electricity many times to understand how things really work.

First, you need to understand what electricity is in your outlet and how it works. Where does the component called - CURRENT - come from?

EMF, CURRENT, VOLTAGE, RESISTANCE. | Patreon

Learn to design a typical electromagnetic generator with stator and rotor cores (closed magnetic circuits) with a ratio of 0.89-0.92 between the output power and the mechanical power required to rotate the rotor.

Next, you need to learn how to control the operation of this generator with an electrical circuit with different loads that are constantly turned on or off according to their own operating algorithm.

When you master everything and know exactly what you're talking about, you'll look at all the offers for great gadgets differently.

But I still do not advise anyone, if you build yourself a self-propelled source, to show it to everyone. Firstly, you are putting yourself and your family at risk, and secondly, get ready to receive an endless stream of garbage at your address. This stream will be fed by the "system itself", for which your device is undesirable and increases the risk of losing dominance in the electricity sales market.

In my posts on Patreon, I try to explain everything and even give advice on how to do it. But everyone has their own choice, their own level of education and opportunities, their own skills - technical, design, etc.

[rakarskiy]

1880s Edison Dynamo: Electricity in the Steam Era - YouTube

[Ufopolitics]

Electromagnetic generator Theory?
I seen this Pop up to the top again, Wondering what part is the Theory part?

Hello Dr. Wlazlak,

Yes, the "Generator Theory" is based on the 1831 Discovery of "Electromagnetic Induction" and presented by Michael Faraday.

Again I have a handbook from 1933 standard handbook for electrical engineers that tells everything one wishes to know
as Facts on Transformers, Generators, Electromagnetic Coils - all electrical applications ( not as theory but as facts )
where testing on every aspect of all these systems were in depth covers every possible way on how these things work
and the Physics behind them things also.

1933?...Not far back enough...talking about the "Theory" as when it was born initially. As this  "Theory" contains the basic stuff, the "essential and precise model", NOT ALL the several Machines designed based on the original model, as interpreted by Electric Engineers in the years after, all over the World...and up to NOW.
At least I, like to do that whenever I am designing an Electromagnetic Generator, and trying to achieve OU, I always start by Faraday original models...plus explanations, plus his main Induction Formula...again, year 1831-1835.

So saying: The Electromagnetic Generator Theory - means - NOT real from the start ---  ( just a thought )

Absolutely NOT! ( to what you wrote above: "NOT real from the start")...On the contrary, based on Faraday's work, we have the ESSENTIAL MODEL(S) that gives us the BASIC understanding on Electromagnetic Induction.

Water seeks it own level, electrical energy does the same thing, plus electrical power is only 1 energy - like using gravity only - This type never works - because it is mostly only 1 input for 1 output minus friction = less than 99 percent every time- again ( balance of the universe - can't beat it - ) But! The fact is there is no electromagnetic theory - just not knowing a guessing what the mystery of how electric makes magnetic things work that why they seem to do what they seem to do.

Your analysis is very "general" based on 1 input versus 1 output (and of course I know where you are getting at...Your work, where you use 2 Input to 1 Output)

When we go into the world of electromagnetic induction, it is a totally different scenario than comparing it to a Mechanical System.

We can make a Generator (As an example: Figuera) which have 1 Input to multiple Outputs possibilities...

...And most importantly, on Figuera's Generator example, there is NO Mechanical Friction (understand "Physical movement") at ALL!...so, not "deducting" that parameter from Output.

Regards

Ufopolitics

[rakarskiy]

Unfortunately, I encountered contradictions in the theory of electric generators. I talked to both physicists and design engineers. I am also in constant contact with electrical engineers. Physicists research and imagine, but there are many contradictions in this study, and their task is to make the square fit the round so that the constants of theoretical physics (Lorentz's rule is such a far-fetched constant) fit together. Talking to electrical engineers, I realized that 99% do not have accurate knowledge of how an electromagnetic generator with closed magnetic circuits works. Only design engineers smile and are not very verbose, but they design and build these very generators.

For me, it all started with calculations. A garage foreman who manufactured collectorless axial power generators asked me to make him an Excel calculator. I fulfilled his request. The calculations were based on the EMF formula for cutting wire with magnetic lines. Everything worked like clockwork. This helped the master. Then he asked me about the possibility of applying the calculation algorithm to power generators based on AC motors. The plan was to remove the rotor of an AC motor and insert a permanent magnet rotor. I read training materials where these calculations are also based on cutting magnetic lines. But the master wrote to me that it doesn't work at all. I was in a stupor, as was the master, but he was determined to find a solution. It costs a lot of money to order such a calculation from a design bureau.

I tried to understand why engineering materials and general education differ in the calculation of EMF. Synchronous generator calculation technologies are like a separate section of electromechanics, where mechanics, electrodynamics of electrical circuits, dynamics of magnetic circuits are combined. Designing electric generators is aerobatics of all types of designing electrical mechanisms.

A page where exactly the engineering calculations for a synchronous traditional generator are. Ordinary electrical engineers shy away from this, like the devil from incense. But with puffed-up cheeks they undertake to claim that they know everything.

Calculation of a synchronous generator (in Russian)
At present, synchronous generators are the main source of electric power. Their capacity ranges from several kilowatts to hundreds of thousands of kilowatts. Synchronous generators are installed in thermal and hydroelectric power plants, aircraft, ships, and are used in various mobile power sources.

The main properties of a synchronous generator are given by the characteristics that determine the relationship between the voltage at the anchor terminals, the excitation current, the load current at the rated rotation speed and the constant power factor in the steady state.

The design of an electric machine is an ambiguous task, since the number of initial calculation equations describing the electromagnetic connections in it is less than the number of unknown quantities. Therefore, the nominal data can be provided with various ratios of the main dimensions and electromagnetic loads of the machine. The optimal result largely depends on the experience of the designer and is usually achieved by comparing several options. The minimum total costs, i.e. the cost of materials, manufacturing and operating costs, are most often taken as a universal criterion of optimality. Operating costs, in turn, depend on efficiency, power factor, quality, maintainability and a number of other factors.

Let's take a look at how EMF is calculated for an alternator on educational channels:  EMF Equation of Alternator and AC Synchronous Generator

Have you seen here the method of cutting a conductor with lines of force? Have you seen the geometric paradigm of this phenomenon? The main thing is the number of conductors that are encircled by the magnetic flux Φ, which is measured in Webers and is the derivative of the product of the cross-section of the magnetic flux S and the magnetic induction B_m  [ Φ= S*B_m ]

The main thing is the number of conductors [N] in the magnetic flux [Ф]. Have you seen the geometric diagram of the calculated interaction moment?


Let's take the technology of calculating the EMF of the secondary circuit of the transformer:  EMF Equation of Transformer | Turns Ratio of Transformer

Both technologies lead to the same version of the resulting formula for the peak value of the induction EMF: Е = 4.44NΦf 

where 4.44 is a constant coefficient calculated from the value: 1/√2 * 2π = 4.44  (где  1/√2  root mean square coefficient equal to  1/√2  = 1/1,414214 = 0,707107)

Again, you can study one more material:  Electrical Power

Another point: it is practically impossible to apply this formula to the secondary circuit of a transformer if we use the value of the excited magnetic flux in the core. Just recently I gave an example:

HOW A TRANSFORMER WORKS (MUTUAL INDUCTION) | Patreon

Many people have made claims against me that I am wrong. I answer them, prove it to me with a real example and calculations. Both physicists and engineers retreated with their claims. It took me time to figure this out, and gray hairs, so I do not take any authorities at their word, only evidence.

The invention of the electromagnetic generator | Patreon

_______________________________
The official theory of the electromagnetic oscillator, is the most confusing part of electrodynamics and electromechanics. They even wrote to me, why do I need it? All the same you will not prove anything to anyone, everyone will not give up their PhD, doctorate and other regalia. For this reason it is easier to teach the real essence of things only to those who need it to a narrow circle of specialists.