Discussion about the Lockridge Device

[Ufopolitics]

FOUR BRUSHES MOUNTING ON TWO STATOR DYNAMO

Hello All,

Ok, so here I will do a deeper GRAPHIC Analysis on the way this Two Stator Dynamo could be transformed ONLY on the BRUSHES SIDE, in order to make the Test I have proposed before...
There is NOT MUCH ROOM on this FORD Dynamo Cap, to "play" with, and fit ALL FOUR BRUSHES as using the WORKING ANGLES!!
However, I think this Modification shown below should work fine, and some brushes seats need to be also modified to make them fit without making contact with each other.
First, here is an image of the same Dynamo Brushes Cap that I have installed* all Four Brushes:

(Installed*) Only done in Photoshop!!, NOT REAL!!, it is just a "Software Montage" to know exactly where I need to MODIFY AND SET, ALL brushes in reality.

As here below is the CAD Image of those Four Brushes SPECIFIC Angles, in order to work properly:

And finally, here are BOTH IMAGES, as background I have the First image shown here, that I had set opacity higher in order to see clearly the TRANSPARENT CAD with all the DATA on TOP:

As you can see, the Modified Angle from OEM (Original) set Brushes have only varied for a few degrees, BUT BELOW the NORMAL PLANE OF MAX INDUCTION!!
Not above this Normal Plane of Max Induction!!, as it was set from factory, and shown on previous Original Two Brushes Images on prior posts.
So, the TWO NEGATIVE BRUSHES are set on the RIGHT and TOP (notice the two white "-" Signs), as the TWO POSITIVE BRUSHES (Red "+") are set ON LOWER END (Approx 6:30 on a Clock) and LEFT (Around 9:00 on Clock config.)
Also, you can notice that Motor Brush Plane is just a few Degrees PAST (BASED ON ROTATION SENSE "R") the NORMAL NEUTRAL PLANE (Orange Dotted Line)!!...AS MOTOR BRUSH PLANE MUST ALWAYS PASS THIS NORMAL NEUTRAL PLANE!!

Note: There may be a few millimetrical TOLERANCE ERRORS on these images, basically, because the original photo was not perfectly centered, like I have explained before.

I will leave it here for now...as I am very busy at the moment with external work (outside free energy and OU environment)

Any questions or doubts, feel free to ask.

Regards

Ufopolitics

[Ufopolitics]

Hello again,

My final thinking about this Test, in order to make it work...

This Device is composed of TWO SYSTEMS, a GENERATOR SIDE (Dynamo) and a MOTORING SIDE.

BOTH SYSTEMS MUST BE FULLY COMPLEMENTED (EXCHANGE FUNCTIONS) BETWEEN EACH SYSTEM IN ORDER TO WORK SATISFACTORILY.

They can NOT work as TWO INDEPENDENT SYSTEMS that are not "INTERLACED" with each other's...meaning, all Angles must be PERFECT or very close to perfection, the "OVERLAPPING of Both Systems need to be in perfect TIMING, as allowing ENOUGH TIME for generator to "Charge and Discharge" before Motor is fully powered to ADVANCE the Timing which will assist the Counter Generating Forces.

We can turn on ONLY the Motor Side (with an external Power Source to only the Motor Brushes) to Measure the Generating side to see if it is showing any Output...if it is not showing anything, it could be that Motor Side is (taking too much from other System) NOT allowing the Generating side to DEVELOP PROPERLY a strong Induction.

Many tests need to be done here...many!!

Ufopolitics

[hiwater]

We can turn on ONLY the Motor Side (with an external Power Source to only the Motor Brushes) to Measure the Generating side to see if it is showing any Output...if it is not showing anything, it could be that Motor Side is (taking too much from other System) NOT allowing the Generating side to DEVELOP PROPERLY a strong Induction.

Hi UFO. You summed it up in this text. Thats what I have found out to be true. The motor side is just nudged in the direction to be rotated. Other wise the motor side thru the armature isnt quite right for the generator side to run the motor and charge at the same time.

Yes there are lots of test to be done to acheive what you are talking about in that last post.

[Ufopolitics]

We can turn on ONLY the Motor Side (with an external Power Source to only the Motor Brushes) to Measure the Generating side to see if it is showing any Output...if it is not showing anything, it could be that Motor Side is (taking too much from other System) NOT allowing the Generating side to DEVELOP PROPERLY a strong Induction.

Hi UFO. You summed it up in this text. Thats what I have found out to be true. The motor side is just nudged in the direction to be rotated. Other wise the motor side thru the armature isnt quite right for the generator side to run the motor and charge at the same time.

Yes there are lots of test to be done to acheive what you are talking about in that last post.

Hello Hiwater,

Thanks, but when I wrote that test about powering DIRECTLY the Motor side with an External PSU, I did it without thinking in depth...as it will NOT WORK!!

Simply because whenever we directly excite (power up) a Motor Circuit, we will have all the generated power on that circuit (Armature) reflected as BEMF, or Counter EMF.

So, this test will not give us any generated power on the Generator Brushes.

The Lockridge Device MUST START from the Dynamo Side as a GENERATOR, simply by turning the front pulley. So that the Generator Side ACTIVATES (Power up) the Motor Side, it will NOT work the other way around!!

PLUS, the Generator Side MUST BE LOADED, whenever we turn the Pulley.

And there is more:

On image above is the KEY about understanding the Motor-Generator Differences, related to EMF and Currents on Both Systems.

Both Machines are Rotating on the SAME DIRECTION, and Upper Brushes are Positive for both Machines.

1- On Dynamo as Generator: EMF and Currents travel on the SAME Direction, both going to the Upper Positive Brush.

2- On Dynamo as Motor: EMF and Currents are OPPOSED, as Currents travel AWAY from upper Positive Brush.

From above data collected from an old book...we can realize that CURRENTS on Both Systems (Motor-Generator) MUST RUN ON THE SAME DIRECTION, when working together on the same Armature Circuit, in order for our Device to work as we want to.
If Currents are OPPOSITE on Both Systems SHARING the SAME ARMATURE, they will just CANCEL to a big ZERO.

Anyways, that is just the way I see it...

Regards

Ufopolitics

[Ufopolitics]

@hiwater,

Please, if you have a Delco Remy Old type Dynamo, can you share here the ORIGINAL Brushes ASSEMBLY IMAGES (Brush plus Mounts, housings and Springs) that came with those Dynamos?

Because according to my search, the Brush Assembly that is shown on Bedini's Video Lockridge Replication does NOT look like the original Dynamo type but a MODIFIED Assembly from a Delco-Remy STARTER Brush from those times.

This type of Brush Assembly Design allows for us to be able to ADJUST FREELY, without any limitations.

While the Brush Assembly type that MOUNTS on Upper Caps (like my FORD Dynamo) do NOT have that adjustment freedom.

Note that the brushes used on this Lockridge replication had a HOLE from factory where a bolt mounts it on rocking arm, while spring mounts on the rotating pin.
If you search for Delco Remy Starter Brushes, it shows exactly these types with a hole, there are square or plain rectangular, but ALL have a hole.

Look below at the Replacement Parts for a Delco-Remy Starter from those times (All Delco-Remy Starters come in a set of FOUR Brushes)

That last image above is a: "BRUSH HOLDER" REPLACEMENT for a Delco Remy Starter, as it is also the SWIVEL or ROCKER ARM, where Brush is mounted with an 8/32 Bolt, and PIN passes through base hole, it is NOT Metal but INSULATED MATERIAL....Now compare it with First image here from Bedini's video...of course, this is a new replacement part, NOT the original.

Now, on Image below is the "Delco-Remy Starter Repair Kit" we can see all separated parts, and of course, on this Starters, Two Brushes were Positive (Insulated by Plastic Brush Holder (Black)) as the other two were to Negative Ground, so, TWO of the Brush Holders were made of Metal, plus we also see two thick wire Jumpers...one for negative brushes and other for positive.
We can also see on the Right next to the Pins, the Back Mounting Plates, only comes two, we need FOUR.

We can see now a better view of how this Lockridge Device REPLICATION was BUILT...using components from other devices, like Starters...

Thanks @hiwater for your help! 

Regards

Ufopolitics