Overunity Machines

Academy of Sciences => Main Theoretical Scientific Discussions => Topic started by: citfta on Feb 22, 2024, 05:04 PM

Title: Theoretical discussion thread.
Post by: citfta on Feb 22, 2024, 05:04 PM
This  forum was created for actual builders to have a place to share their work and also seek help from others working on the same project.  However as with most forums of this type it has also attracted those that want to post their ideas and theories.  Posting those kind of posts in a builder's thread disrupt the build process and in many cases causes confusion.

Therefore this thread has been created.  The purpose of this thread is for those that want to share their ideas and theories.  You may post any ideas or theories you have here.  But there are some rules.  Failure to follow the rules can get you banned.  There will be NO FLAMING.  We can all act like adults.  You can attack the idea without attacking the person.  The second rule is that if you post a theory that clearly goes against accepted science you will be required to demonstrate your theory.  Your proof can be a working circuit or video showing your proof.

As an example of theory that goes against accepted science.  It has been posted on this forum that a resistor can change the resonant frequency of a coil.  That goes against accepted science.  The formula for calculating the resonant frequency of a coil has been used for over a hundred years and it still works.  And it does NOT include any resistance.  Of course a RLC circuit does include resistance.

If you cannot produce proof of your theory your post will be deleted.  Ufo and I have discussed the fact that there are many visitors to this site every day.  We do NOT want this site to become a source of misinformation and confusion to those that may be in the early learning stages of electronics.  Posting different ideas and theories is fine but posting nonsense is not.

Respectfully,
Carroll
Title: Re: Theoretical discussion thread.
Post by: Ufopolitics on Feb 22, 2024, 05:27 PM
Hello Citfta,

This is great!!, and many thanks to you for the creation of this Thread!!

Yes, We needed this type of Science Control Guidance on this Website, so, we are not taken as any other website out there, that is full of nonsense, a lot of errors and mistakes posted that are allowed to be uploaded, and this tends to confusion and misleading from Real Scientific Facts!!

We, at the Administration, have granted you ALL the authorized permissions, as a Global Moderator, to carry on with any necessary actions that you decide to take from now on.

And We will be guiding you on anything that you need, related to your new position.

[color=var(--input-txt-color)]As I am sure you will handle it excellently, knowing all your decades of experience, knowledge and practically working on majority of related Fields of Science.[/color]

Many thanks, and welcome to this new enterprise!!

Regards

Ufopolitics
Title: Re: Theoretical discussion thread.
Post by: Dr.Wlazlak on Jan 31, 2025, 11:57 PM
I have a Theory about Why Permanent Magnets produce their power and this also has to do with why the Gravity is present in the universe
First I have noticed on the global map of the planet lines on the Ocean's floor That only make sense 
If the earth is expanding in size and the Continents are staying in place and the Ocean floor is moving Away from the Continents leaving drag marks on the Ocean's floor as the Earth expands 
( If the Continents were moving away form each other as science says those drag marks that are very large would not be there ) So my Theory is
Gravity is being produced by the expansion of everything in the universe 
1.5 billion years ago ( according to the drag marks made as the Earth expanded was about 8,000 miles in [color=var(--body-txt-color)]circumference ( now it is about 24,000 miles in circumference )[/color]
1.5 billion years all the Continents were connected as 1 Continent and land cover totally with Ocean 
As the Earth expanded the water level took up less height because the world was bigger exposing the Continents to air above the water - as it is today -  ( gravity is made by the decompression of the big bang where all mater was compress to a very high pressure ) 

When a Permanent Magnetic is Charged the pressure on the magnetic at the atomic level produces the same slow release of energy of magnetic force such as the same Theory as Expansion making gravity

A NeFeB magnet is under 30,000 lbs pressure after it is charged ( does it loose that pressure if heated ?
losing it's magnetic field at the same time. ?

Again Something to think about - check out the lines on the bottom of the Pacific Ocean's floor - see if you see the same things I see ( The lines come form drag not push ) pushing would leave no marks in that way Expanding is one answer - There could be another ? maybe? ( just a Theory -- second post ever on the string --- Dr Wlazlak

Title: Re: Theoretical discussion thread.
Post by: Leonard on Feb 01, 2025, 06:42 AM
Quote from: citfta on Feb 22, 2024, 05:04 PMThis  forum was created for actual builders to have a place to share their work and also seek help from others working on the same project.  ........
Thank you Carroll! 
I really appreciate this approach to keep the forum under control based on common sense. Without this, a forum can become a total chaos and no sensible information can be found. I am glad to have ended up here.
Kind regards,
Leonard
Title: Re: Theoretical discussion thread.
Post by: Dr.Wlazlak on Mar 04, 2025, 05:26 PM
Lets consider the theory of the Big Bang - most Physicist and Scientist believe that such an event is possible -
With that basis - the idea of such an event happening leads to 2 conclusions 
One - The Big bang - was nothing before it happened -
Two - All the energy in the known Universe came from something that was nothing before it became something

What I find it hard to believe is Science could believe in something like the Big Band - 

But not believe in something being he same thing as ( Overunity ) just like what happened in the Big Bang 

something more being produce over the amount that was started with or more energy from less energy -

It must be Science and Physics can believe in the same things but say they do not believe in the same things 

The names and ideas have been changed to confuse the mass population as desired - ( to believe or not to believe that is the question )

This is the Scientific method? ( I guess? ) 

Dr. Wlazlak - retired ( for a reason ) -- I Think ---