Overunity Machines

Hello to All,

As I want to keep the Original Topic:  FIGUERA'S AETHER MAGNETIC FIELDS LINEAR PUMP, REVIVED (overunitymachines.com) (https://overunitymachines.com/index.php/topic,5.0/topicseen.html)  as a "Manual for Assembly and Understanding Book", reason why I have been deleting some posts which questions or opinions may diverge/deviate from the original idea I am trying to convey...

At the same token, I would like to read your opinions or any questions you have about this Development.

Reason why I have created this Topic, where you could post any doubts, or any questions related to this development.

I promise I will not delete any comments posted here, unless they violate the Forum and Policy Rules.
Or comments which are OFF TOPIC.

Regards

Ufopolitics

Hello UFO,
              Here is a link to a youtube video of John Bedini explaining the function of the Lockridge device. It was , self runner, maybe some similar functions in Figuera device.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YxrU2UGVFDQ

Quote from: Greg GKP on Oct 05, 2024, 12:45 PMHello UFO,
              Here is a link to a youtube video of John Bedini explaining the function of the Lockridge device. It was , self runner, maybe some similar functions in Figuera device.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YxrU2UGVFDQ

Hello Greg,

No, the Lockridge device was a combination of a Motor-Generator, a Rotary device, as the Figuera I am working on now and developing is about a Motionless Linear Generator, based on his 1908 Patent.
The "Motor" on this Figuera Generator is a Virtual Magnetic Field Linear displacement.

I will explain later on more detail.

Ufopolitics

Hello All,

I would like to bring here, for further discussion an interesting analysis that member @Prajna post on his Topic (link to his website)

Quote from: Prajna on Sep 14, 2024, 04:25 PMWhile waiting for some filament...

https://tomboy-pink.co.uk/figuera/

As the nice 3D CAD Prajna made:


And that is pretty good, as it is a much better and cleaner drawing in Three Dimensions, than what we got (in 2D) from the original 1908 patent!

Prajna's explanation:

QuoteFiguera's patent describes a machine that can be broken down into three main assemblies: a Switch, a voltage divider, coils.

The Switch - labelled 'G' in the image - is designed to switch the input current coming in on the wire marked 'Pos' to various points along the voltage divider and depending where the current is entering the voltage divider the current is divided between the two coils marked 'N' and 'S'.

The brush is not actually shown in the patent drawing, merely indicated with a '+' but I think my analysis below is correct.

The Switch works by rotating the Brush arm so that the Brush makes contact with one contact and sometimes two contacts leading to points on the voltage divider. The brush is designed to Make Before Break (MBB) so that the circuit is always connected, either feeding current to one coil or the other or between the resistors in the voltage divider, splitting the current between the coils or either side of one of the resistors, which will effectively drop that resistor out of the circuit.

The effect of the brush rotating (whether clockwise or anticlockwise) is to sweep the current, relatively smoothly, from the N coil to the S coil and back again. This is likely to create a strong magnetic field in the N coil and that field will be presented to the Output coil (Out or y) inducing a current in it due to the changing magnetic field. As the current is swept towards the S coil the Output coil will see a changing magnetic field, just as if a magnet is moved away or towards a coil, as happens in a generator.

When a magnetic field is permitted to run in a material an opposite magnetic field is created in the material, which opposes the field that induced it. In a normal generator the motive power is used to overcome that reactive field. That effect is referred to as Lenz' Law.

I believe the principle that Figuera relies on for his device is that he rotates his magnetic field (which is what a generator does) with negligible effort, since it is merely a case of rotating the brush, and any field induced in the Output coil has nothing for the Lenz force to act on.

It looks pretty simple to build and test but a great many people have tried and failed.

The explanation is great, except for the Bold and specifically underlined statement:

QuoteFiguera relies on for his device is that he rotates his magnetic field

Figuera does NOT ROTATES the Magnetic Field!

Figuera EXPANDS and CONTRACTS the named "N" and "S" Fields, which causes a LINEAR-SPATIAL DISPLACEMENT of both Fields ALTERNATIVELY.

And this fact is what makes Figuera device "unique" on its class. Figuera uses a completely NOVEL LINEAR INDUCTION.

Where the "inductors" (N & S) are facing each other's, with the "Induced" (Y) set IN BETWEEN (Sandwiched)

Even though there are a couple of drawbacks on his approach on operating function, the MOST we can get from it, is the DIFFERENT and RADICAL STRUCTURE and Magnetic Field LINEAR DISPLACEMENT.

From there, we can add INFINITE different approaches and possibilities, always using the FIGUERA'S LINEAR CONCEPT.

Regards

Ufopolitics

Hello All,

From the ages of Dixie up to now, the existing ROTARY GENERATOR is an ANGLED-ROTARY INDUCTION.

On ANY Rotary Generator the "Induced Coil" on the Stator (or what is also called "the Stator's Field") is nothing more than TWO SPREAD SINGLE COILS (in SERIES) along the CIRCULAR SLOTS at the Stator. Where each Stator Coil is configured apart by 180º.

So, on this ROTARY Generator, we have an EXCITER ROTOR that on a simple Two Poles is just a N-S Single Field, which PROJECTS its Poles on a STRAIGHT, DIRECTIONAL FASHION...

Then, as this Rotor passes each of the Induced COIL'S SEGMENTS, that are spread along its circumferential Stator Core, these Two Poles are actually sweeping each coil segments at different ANGLED-TIME INDUCTION; and, as such, ADDING to the Total Induction Output whenever the Cycle is completed.

And here comes Figuera analysis...from a Rotary Generator or more specifically "a Dynamo" from the late 1800's to the beginning of the 1900's.

Figuera noticed on his observations (explained in great detail, on his 1908 Patent) that all it takes place to achieve Induction on a Rotary Dynamo or Generator, is that Inductor Fields "approaches" to then "leave" the Induced Coils.

It is exactly from this simple analysis, that Figuera "mimics" what a Rotary Generator does, HOWEVER, Figuera does it on a LINEAR FASHION CONFIGURATION.

And obviously these TWO BASIC FIELD FUNCTIONS (1-Approach 2-Leave) of Exciter or Inductor, Figuera uses the EXAMPLE as 1-Increasing-2-Decreasing the Currents that feed the Exciter(s), generating an Expansion and Contraction of the Field respectively.

Up to here is the BASIC Figuera interpretation from a Rotary Generator.

And again, the BEST that we should take from Figuera's approach, are just the Linear Approach plus his Analysis on these two simple functions (approach-leave).

Therefore, I believe, all other "details" were just given as a basic-general understanding (by example) of what Figuera basically, mainly, wanted Patented and Protected.

Regards

Ufopolitics

Quote from: Ufopolitics on Oct 14, 2024, 09:25 AMHello All,

I would like to bring here, for further discussion an interesting analysis that member @Prajna post on his Topic (link to his website)

...

Even though there are a couple of drawbacks on his approach on operating function, the MOST we can get from it, is the DIFFERENT and RADICAL STRUCTURE and Magnetic Field LINEAR DISPLACEMENT.

From there, we can add INFINITE different approaches and possibilities, always using the FIGUERA'S LINEAR CONCEPT.

Regards

Ufopolitics

Thanks, @UfoPolitics, and you are right, that paragraph is wrong. I'll rewrite it to better reflect what the patent indicates.

And thanks for taking the time to look at my page.

Hi @UfoPolitics, just to update you: I edited that paragraph so it now says, "I believe the principle that Figuera relies on for his device is that he rotates his magnetic field (in fact, as noted above, Figuera doesn't rotate his field as is done in a conventional generator, rather he reciprocates it, making one pole stronger and then the other) with negligible effort, since it is merely a case of rotating the brush, and any field induced in the Output coil has nothing for the Lenz force to act on."

I hope that is clearer.

Hello All,

Great, thanks, so, here it is:

Discussion about the Lockridge Device (https://overunitymachines.com/index.php/topic,107.0/topicseen.html)

I have moved all post related to the Lockridge Topic above.

Later on, I will clean this Topic.

Thanks again for understanding.

Ufopolitics

Quote from: Prajna on Oct 18, 2024, 12:55 PMHi @UfoPolitics, just to update you: I edited that paragraph so it now says, "I believe the principle that Figuera relies on for his device is that he rotates his magnetic field (in fact, as noted above, Figuera doesn't rotate his field as is done in a conventional generator, rather he reciprocates it, making one pole stronger and then the other) with negligible effort, since it is merely a case of rotating the brush, and any field induced in the Output coil has nothing for the Lenz force to act on."

I hope that is clearer.

@Prajna 

Great Thanks!

Prior you have made an offer to build a 3D Animation of your 3D CAD Graphic that I have shown on the first page...can you do it whenever you get a chance, please?

As it will help alot to understand the basic Field Movements or Expanding-Contracting of the two components N & S.

Regards

Ufopolitics

Hello All,

Ok, about the Linear Versus Rotary...the basic details.

I want to make sure you understand perfectly well these two terms in the same level that I have full domain to then apply them in all your future designs.
Therefore, on the following posts, I want to establish the radical differences between the two Induction Methods.

On the Rotary part...


On the image above I have a typical rotary generator, two poles on the exciter rotor, represented by the Rectangle having the two poles N & S, as I have set all coils on the Stator right next to each other's, not overlapped, plainly set for the sake of simplicity...

The Exciter Rotor spins at 3600 RPM's, and each Coil spreads exactly 60º, so we have a total of Six (6) Coils, which are connected in series, that closes the circumference to the full 360º.

I have also set a black rectangle enclosing the N Pole and one coil, where Field is perfectly centered-aligned to this coil, and that I have a RED arrow showing the word "View"...which means next image will set us as looking from that Viewpoint.

And the Graphic below shows ON THE LEFT IMAGE, that specific Viewpoint:


On image above I have BOTH METHODS together:

1- On LEFT IMAGE is just a Section of the Rotational Type Electromagnetic Induction.

2- On the RIGHT IMAGE, I am showing the Figuera Linear Electromagnetic Induction.

As one of the main differences that we can see at plain sight, are written for each Drawing:

1- On the Rotary Induction, the North Pole B-Field is PERPENDICULAR to the FIELD DISPLACEMENT.

2- On the Linear Induction, the North B-Field is PARALLEL to the FIELD DISPLACEMENT.

On the Rotary Induction, due to the Field Displacement being Perpendicular to Field Pole Projection (B-Field) this attribute generates an Electron Spin on ONLY the Coil wires that are VERTICALLY running on the Square Steel Core. (As Maxwell stated on his books)
Normally, this specific generation developing only on the Vertical Conductors, has been attributed to the "Imaginary Lines of Force" CUTTING ONLY the Vertical conductors, while all Horizontal wires in the Coil serve as "conductors" of the EMF Generated.


On Image above I have Highlighted ALL VERTICAL WIRE SEGMENTS IN RED on the Induced Coil, as the only sections of the wires which generate an EMF, all the rest of wires only serve as conductors, as adding Resistance to the Circuit.
Note: I did not add all the "Imaginary Lines of Force" to this graphic not to create a lot of confusing lines, however, these lines of force run parallel to B-Field Vector and all around the front spatial part of the Magnetic Field.

So, I guess the Horizontal wires do not get to be "cut" by the Imaginary Lines of Force, since they are parallel to the Field Displacement, not perpendicular like all the Vertical ones.

And here, I do not want to enter into specific details on Both Theories -at this point- about if it is Maxwell or Faraday Theories which is right or wrong, AS BOTH THEORIES SATISFY REALITY, this is a fact, meaning in reality, this is how ALL rotary generators electromagnetic induction takes place.

But basically, this is a HUGE disadvantage that Rotary Induction Systems brings along, that only HALF (OR A PORTION THEREOF) OF ALL THE INDUCED COILS are the ones that actually generates EMF, while all other conductors just add Resistance to the Induction Circuit.

If you all have noticed, ALL Rotary Generators Stator-Induced Coils have the upper and lower coil wires BENT AWAY from the AIR GAP where majority of Field Force is taking place...As also you may have noticed that large outputting generators are more ELONGATED VERTICALLY than lower output ones...this is done to have Vertical wires taking more space than horizontal wires. And, of course, also the Exciter Rotor must be Elongated as well.

So far, I have dedicated this post to the explanation of the Rotary Method...and I am still not finished with rotary.

Regards

Ufopolitics

Quote from: Ufopolitics on Oct 22, 2024, 05:39 PMPrior you have made an offer to build a 3D Animation of your 3D CAD Graphic that I have shown on the first page...can you do it whenever you get a chance, please?

As it will help alot to understand the basic Field Movements or Expanding-Contracting of the two components N & S.

Regards

Ufopolitics

Sure thing. There is rain forecast for next week, so I can justify spending time in front of the computer.

Hello all,

Please forgive my ignorance but, I really want to understand this method of operation.

If magnetic field (unidirectional) is maintained ALL TIME in the system and only the point of great of magnetism respective N pole and S pole is changing position relative to the system ... why do we have a so called BEMF ? Back spike only happens when magnetic field collapse as far as I am aware and magnetic field reverse polarity.

As I can understand with my limited knowledge in Figuera generator primary coils maintain the unidirectional field all time while secondaries will see it as a virtual magnet traveling in the same direction ... where I agree the secondaries will see this like a magnet going in and out in a controlled manner where BEMF is due mostly to the synchronised movement induced by primaries and not due to natural occurring force of the nature ... or at least natural force is assisted by the system.

Now, I am having some difficulties to understand how the influence of the secondaries over primaries is mitigated in such way that the induced can not see the inducer and remove the extra effort required to fight against the nature ... it should be a delay somewhere happening in order to obtain the gain we seek ?

Not sure if I am wrong, but the induced coil will have a reversed magnetic polarity in relation to inducer.

I am just thinking of this system like a hammer and nail inserted into piece of wood, we hit the nail with adequate force to penetrate the wood and the wood will exert enough friction/clamping force to retain the nail into position, continuous hammering will make the nail to advance in one direction only if the force applied is strong enough to overcome the resistance of the wood opposing the nail.
Also, I can observe if the wood start to crack due to excessive size of the nail, there is no friction/clamping force to retain the nail into position.

I do understand the importance of correct driving the primaries but, I can't see any focus or explanations of isolation between primaries and secondaries ... which Figuera has accounted in order to obtain a beneficial gain.

If my post is detrimental to forum discussion please ignore/delete as seen apropriate.

Quote from: Classic on Nov 04, 2025, 05:35 AMQuote from: Classic (https://overunitymachines.com/index.php?msg=2706) on 04/11/2025, 10:35:17
If magnetic field (unidirectional) is maintained ALL TIME in the system and only the point of great of magnetism respective N pole and S pole is changing position relative to the system ... why do we have a so called BEMF ? Back spike only happens when magnetic field collapse as far as I am aware and magnetic field reverse polarity.

Under normal operation of the device you wouldn't expect to have any inductive kickback since the field isn't collapsing at any point. You would only have inductive kickback when the device is switched off, or if there was a fault that caused it to stop.

Quote from: Classic on Nov 04, 2025, 05:35 AMQuote from: Classic (https://overunitymachines.com/index.php?msg=2706) on 04/11/2025, 10:35:17
Now, I am having some difficulties to understand how the influence of the secondaries over primaries is mitigated in such way that the induced can not see the inducer and remove the extra effort required to fight against the nature.

Not sure if I am wrong, but the induced coil will have a reversed magnetic polarity in relation to inducer.

I am just thinking of this system like a hammer and nail inserted into piece of wood, we hit the nail with adequate force to penetrate the wood and the wood will exert enough friction/clamping force to retain the nail into position, continuous hammering will make the nail to advance in one direction only if the force applied is strong enough to overcome the resistance of the wood opposing the nail.

This is my take, which may be wrong:
Since there is no mechanical motion there isn't a force between 'rotor' and 'stator'. Mechanical generators waste power trying to overcome those physical forces in the generator, such as friction. The primary and secondary magnetic fields don't interact directly in space. The magnetic field strength and flux is simply the summation of all magnetic fields at a point in space. These fields don't interact directly.

QuoteThe principle of superposition

Electric fields created by different sources, e.g., by two or more point charges, simply add together as vectors. Similarly magnetic fields created by different sources, e.g., by two or more current-carrying wires, also add together as vectors. This superposition principle applies to all electric and magnetic fields, including those comprising electromagnetic waves created by different sources. If the E vectors point approximately in the same direction at a given instant of time, the result of adding the vectors will be a sum that is larger than its parts: this is known as constructive interference. If on the other hand, the E vectors point approximately in opposite directions, the result will be smaller than its parts, which is known as destructive interference.

Superposition works for other types of waves also. For example, when small-amplitude waves on the surface of a liquid pass each other, the superposition of two wave crests passing each other creates an extra-high crest; while a crest passing a trough creates a flat spot. (Large-amplitude waves in the ocean are a more complicated story: when two of them meet, they can cause each other to break.)

Quote from: Classic on Nov 04, 2025, 09:42 AMHello all,

Please forgive my ignorance but, I really want to understand this method of operation.

Hello Classic,

Quote from: Classic on Nov 04, 2025, 09:42 AMIf magnetic field (unidirectional) is maintained ALL TIME in the system and only the point of great of magnetism respective N pole and S pole is changing position relative to the system ... why do we have a so called BEMF ? Back spike only happens when magnetic field collapse as far as I am aware and magnetic field reverse polarity.

I don't know why you call this magnetic field "unidirectional"...it is running on Spacetime on a Bidirectional fashion, or back and forth.
Second, on this Linear Series Config, we have a sequence where the 'disconnected coils' from sequence will always (as the intrinsic and normal reaction of any coil) REVERSE Voltage with a much higher spike than it was at input...

Quote from: Classic on Nov 04, 2025, 09:42 AMAs I can understand with my limited knowledge in Figuera generator primary coils maintain the unidirectional field all time while secondaries will see it as a virtual magnet traveling in the same direction ... where I agree the secondaries will see this like a magnet going in and out in a controlled manner where BEMF is due mostly to the synchronised movement induced by primaries and not due to natural occurring force of the nature ... or at least natural force is assisted by the system.

On the original 1908 Figuera Patent, the way it is described with the only one diagram it has, is that he varies the resistance of the primary coils (inducing coils), and when you do that, you are also varying the Currents (amperage), since they are 'indirectly (inversely) proportional', so when resistance increases, amperage decreases.
When amperage decreases, so does the Magnetic Field strength, decreases.

Figuera wanted to 'mimic' what he observed on the generators of his time...that the inducing coils will come closer to the induced coils to then leave further away, when rotation  was taking place.

The flaws on his 1908 Patent design is that when you are approaching the Induced, is when you MUST have the Field at full strength, not the contrary.
According to the way he has set his commutator with the only positive brush.

We will never know if this patented design was his final and successful one...I honestly doubt it.

Quote from: Classic on Nov 04, 2025, 09:42 AMNow, I am having some difficulties to understand how the influence of the secondaries over primaries is mitigated in such way that the induced can not see the inducer and remove the extra effort required to fight against the nature ... it should be a delay somewhere happening in order to obtain the gain we seek ?

On any electromagnetic generator there will always be TWO Fields, the Inducing Field and whenever the secondary or 'Field Coils' are LOADED (closed) then they generate this REACTIVE FIELD. Again this is 'Natural' Fields Interaction response, there is NOTHING we can do to change that fact.

Now, the Inducing Field will influence the secondary generating power by induction (Faraday 1800's) and this Field will WEAKEN as soon as the secondary is LOADED.
We have not been able to change that natural reaction, reason why all generators comes with an Automatic Voltage Regulator (AVR), in order to compensate for the Voltage Drop when loaded, and the higher demand from load, the more the inducing field will fall.

A simple explanation is that the Induced, loaded Field will always 'SUCK' Energy or Drain the Inducing Field...then we need to increase frequency or RPM's to compensate.

This phenomena will take place on ANY Generator, even the Figuera from 1908, or mine now the Linear-Series Approach.

Quote from: Classic on Nov 04, 2025, 09:42 AMNot sure if I am wrong, but the induced coil will have a reversed magnetic polarity in relation to inducer.

You are completely correct, this fact was discovered by Lenz back on the 1800's...(Lenz Law)...then he put a Negative Sign in fron of Faraday Inducing Formula.

Quote from: Classic on Nov 04, 2025, 09:42 AMI am just thinking of this system like a hammer and nail inserted into piece of wood, we hit the nail with adequate force to penetrate the wood and the wood will exert enough friction/clamping force to retain the nail into position, continuous hammering will make the nail to advance in one direction only if the force applied is strong enough to overcome the resistance of the wood opposing the nail.
Also, I can observe if the wood start to crack due to excessive size of the nail, there is no friction/clamping force to retain the nail into position.

That is the WRONG Comparison, just because the wood will NOT Oppose to you hammering the nail...wood is soft, nail is solid steel.
Now, try to hammer a nail on a block of solid steel...

Quote from: Classic on Nov 04, 2025, 09:42 AMI do understand the importance of correct driving the primaries but, I can't see any focus or explanations of isolation between primaries and secondaries ... which Figuera has accounted in order to obtain a beneficial gain.

ALL Generators, including Figuera, and mine...the primary and secondaries are 'isolated', meaning not connected between  them in series nor in parallel.
The only direct relation (interactions) between primary and secondaries is through their Magnetic Fields.

However, we can always have a dedicated secondary to feed back the inducing fields through an external electrical connection, ALL Generators do have that.

Hope you are satisfied with my answers.

Regards

Ufopolitics

Please forgive my ignorance but, why do you need to move back and forth that virtual magnet along the secondary if you want to maintain the field and secondary is not bifilar to introduce a magnetic delay ? Why not "flowing" in one direction only with a break/space between consecutive virtual magnets ?

Of course you can have 2 or more virtual magnets traveling in the same direction (with appropriate spacing between) in the same time on a single linear generator.

I have never seen any generator driven kinetically constant spinning making 360 degree rotation and then reversing every 360 degree ... this is what I am able to see happening when your virtual magnet travel back and forth.

I already posted on my topic info regarding "reactive power". When voltage collapse excessive curent start to flow demanding even more current from source (generator coil) and system will shut down or overheat ! It is quite clear that in this point the voltage must be sustained, not the current. Solution is to inject reactive power with voltage leading back into generating coils using a shunt reactor (almost ordinary oscillator) if you look at the picture showing such shunt reactor on the page with link provided.

And that will form an "joule thief" without transistor based on resistance to make the switching possible and very little input used to power loads that exceed capacity of generator to provide power. Blocking oscillator based on resistance, means will prevent back flow, fix the energy pushed out and add on each pulse or each virtual magnet knocking electrons out of the coil.

"functioning as an island and not integrated in a large and complexelectrical network, generators are requested to supply the excessive capacitive power, situation that will cause overheating and malfunctioning of generators, which will decrease the useful life of the equipment."
https://www.electricaltechnology.org/2018/08/shunt-reactor.html

And especially this: https://www.electricaltechnology.org/2019/07/reactive-power-in-power-system.html

I already posted on my topic info regarding "reactive power". When voltage collapse excessive curent start to flow demanding even more current from source (generator coil) and system will shut down or overheat ! It is quite clear that in this point the voltage must be sustained, not the current. Solution is to inject reactive power with voltage leading back into generating coils using a shunt reactor (almost ordinary oscillator) if you look at the picture showing such shunt reactor on the page with link provided.

The part above that I just copied is total nonsense.  You keep bringing up stuff that has nothing to do with what UFO and Kampen are working on.  Please either find another hobby or spend the time to actually learn about electronics before trying to tell others they don't know they are doing.  You've already admitted electronics is not your strong point so please stop trying to tell others they are wrong.  I suspect you have gotten your education from YouTube videos.  That is the worst possible way to learn anything.  If you are serious about wanting to learn electronics then I suggest you find some real books and start studying.  A real good place to start is with a ARRL Handbook.  That is a book for amateur radio operators to use to learn electronics.  You can find older copies on eBay pretty cheap.  Even one 10 years old will have all the basics you need to learn to really understand electronics.

Respectfully,
Carroll

  "Once that we close the circuit at output by adding a load, there is a Secondary Magnetic Field generated instantly, and that field is completely Static/Fixed to steel core and opposed (Lenz) -in polarity- to the exciting/induced field, creating a strong attraction, this reaction will generate a slow down tendency on any moving field, no matter if it is physical or virtual."

HI Ufo,  I am sorry but I have to disagree with a small part of your statement I copied above.  I highlighted in red the part I disagree with.  As you correctly stated in a IC engine powered generator the load will decrease the engine speed if the governor did not adjust for the extra load.  This of course as you said is because of increased Lenz effect causing added load to the engine.  

However I don't know of any mechanism that would cause a virtual rotating field to slow down with increased load.  The speed of the rotating field or frequency is only determined by the drive mechanism.  In the case of your new design the brushes will be rotating at a speed determined by the motor driving the brushes.  That is all that will determine the speed of the rotating field.  The brushes are NOT going to slow down because of an increase in load.

The only thing that I think will happen is that as you draw more current from the secondary the current in the primary will go up.  But the speed of the brushes will remain the same.

I have read your comments about raising the frequency to increase the output.  And that is true up to a point.  If you recall the video that I posted somewhere on this forum I showed that if you go too high in frequency the output will drop off because of the inductive reactance.

Respectfully, your friend,
Carroll

Quote from: citfta on Jan 13, 2026, 06:57 AM"Once that we close the circuit at output by adding a load, there is a Secondary Magnetic Field generated instantly, and that field is completely Static/Fixed to steel core and opposed (Lenz) -in polarity- to the exciting/induced field, creating a strong attraction, this reaction will generate a slow down tendency on any moving field, no matter if it is physical or virtual."

HI Ufo,  I am sorry but I have to disagree with a small part of your statement I copied above.  I highlighted in red the part I disagree with.  As you correctly stated in a IC engine powered generator the load will decrease the engine speed if the governor did not adjust for the extra load.  This of course as you said is because of increased Lenz effect causing added load to the engine. 

However I don't know of any mechanism that would cause a virtual rotating field to slow down with increased load.  The speed of the rotating field or frequency is only determined by the drive mechanism.  In the case of your new design the brushes will be rotating at a speed determined by the motor driving the brushes.  That is all that will determine the speed of the rotating field.  The brushes are NOT going to slow down because of an increase in load.

The only thing that I think will happen is that as you draw more current from the secondary the current in the primary will go up.  But the speed of the brushes will remain the same.

I have read your comments about raising the frequency to increase the output.  And that is true up to a point.  If you recall the video that I posted somewhere on this forum I showed that if you go too high in frequency the output will drop off because of the inductive reactance.

Respectfully, your friend,
Carroll

Hello dear friend @citfta,

We are dealing here with a device we know very little about (moving virtual magnetic fields to generate power)
Then we tend to apply our gained knowledge that is based on the behavior about moving the Magnetic Field along with all components involved on its generation.
From that point of view you are completely correct.

However, whenever we generate a Magnetic Field from any powered coil, we all understand that the Space Properties surrounding this coil change.
This 3D Spatial Volume has the ability to Interact Remotely with other Magnetic Fields nearby without the need to reach the Physical Mass Volume of the two Coils.
We can observe and feel this with Permanent Magnets...for example, we feel the repulsion whenever approximating two equal poles without touching the magnets physically.

And here I will go to my specific setup based on the above explanation.
On my Linear-Series Setup, I have an Inducing Field that is moving and generating a Secondary Field on the Output Main Coil once it gets loaded, which goes from one extreme to the other of steel core, comprehending ALL the Sequential Coils travel path.

This Loaded Output Main Coil Magnetic Field is Static, fixed to its Coil Length and width, BUT, expanding through the Spatial Volume away from the physical coil, which also coincides with the Virtual Moving Field Path.

So, -in my view- I see these Two Fields occupying the same Spatial Volume, where one is moving while the secondary is Static, and I consider that the stronger the secondary field gets (due to high demand loads) this makes the Spatial Volume harder for the moving field to 'advance/thrive', considering that BOTH Fields are Opposed based on Lenz Law, this creates a powerful attraction between the Two Fields.

I know the Driver in charge to move the Inducing Field remotely, only based on wiring connections can accelerate anytime we command it to go  faster, BUT, the Opposition to those commands I know is there due to the Attraction between both fields.

I have driven many setups (not only linear, but also rotary devices based on Virtual Field manipulation) and what you feel is that while you are trying to accelerate your Mechanic Commutator 'suddenly' "ran away" reaching a very high speed, but, the Output drops completely.

I have learned over all this phenomena, that this increase must be done VERY slowly, not to get this "ran away" feeling which I consider is a separation from driver commands and the Virtual Moving Field.

I picture this operation of driving of a Virtual Field as a "rubber band" connection between Virtual Field and Remote Driver.

And so, whenever the two fields (Static and Moving Fields) are under extreme attraction your rubber band starts to stretch and stretch...and if you keep pulling this rubber band, there is point that it literally brakes...then my motor went on a "ran away"...

I have felt this effect so many times...and this is the explanation I find so far to describe it.

Again, we are on "unknown territory" here...and only real testing will get us more knowledge.

As you've mentioned above, this could also be due to the Inductive Reactance, whenever I am pushing too far exceeding the normal operating frequency or driving faster than can be done.

Now, a similar 'feeling' like I am describing above takes place when brushes "fly away" from contacting the commutator surface...however, the noise pitch is different, as sparks are no longer at commutator when brushes lose contact.

Anyways, I really hope that you are totally right, as nothing would be able to stop the moving field...in that case we have a winner here.

Regards my friend

Ufopolitics

 

Hello again @citfta,

Now with this new driver, where the brushes are assisted by Centrifugal Forces, the possibility of brushes separating from commutator surface is remotely possible.
Plus, the 32 Commutator Segments will offer the possibility of driving at lower speeds.

Which only leaves two options for this "ran away" effect to take place, under heavy loading-if it does occur- then we can blame either one, when accelerating beyond established boundaries.

1- Inductive Reactance.
2- My "rubber band" theory.

Anyways, like I wrote before...only Real Bench Testing will return the right answers.

Regards dear friend

Ufopolitics

I agree the real bench testing is the only way to know for sure what will happen.  I am really looking forward to those tests.  Of course I know very well how much work it takes to build and assemble all the proper working parts.  So I will be patient but still eagerly waiting for the real world tests.

Take care my friend,
Carroll

PS:  I believe you have a milling machine.  Do you have an indexing head for it?  With an indexing head and a small right angle cutter you could very accurately cut the grooves for your 32 segment commutator.