Typical “Agenda”, go "apparently" Open Source to then apply for a Patent?

[Ufopolitics]

Hi Ufopolitics,
[...]
Also, I can't think of, or know of, one example of any "Excess Energy (OU)" device that worked properly
and was suddenly conficated by the Feds or MIC - last time I checked we were still fueling our Jets with
JP4 and running our Jeeps on petrol. Of course, I can only know, what I know!

SL

Yes, it is obvious "you have never heard of any such device(s) that was/were confiscated before..."

Just because you have not done the proper research...

Do this Inventor's names and their inventions (devices) sound familiar at all?

1- Stanley Meyer (1990's) Water Powered Car...

2- Johnson Super Electric Motor, 300 HP...(Greyhound contract never took place)

3- Joseph Newman's Motor...(1980's) ended up patenting his motor in South Africa...US denied his Patent.

4- Dr. Robert Moray's Energy Solid State Generator (1950's)

5- Arie De Geus Infinite Pancake Battery...(1990's)

And so, I could go on and on...like the Energizer Rabbit...

Back to the "Secrecy Act"...

Each year, tens of thousands of inventions and patent applications are reviewed by hand to decide if they should be allowed to be published or should be hidden from the public. In the four-year window of 2013 to 2017, an average of 117 new inventions per year were restricted with Secrecy Orders.

In the same 2013-2017 period of time, an average of 25 Secrecy Orders were reportedly rescinded per year.

5,792 unique patents were placed under Secrecy Orders in 2018.

Through 2012-2020, the United States Patent Office began investigations into expanding application of the Invention Secret Act to have more consideration of economic impacts on American markets from new inventions, if those new ideas may be disruptive to existing industries.


Anyways, this was NOT the point of this Topic...at all.

And so, I need TO DRIVE IT BACK where the point was and STILL IS, RELATED TO THIS WEBSITE.

Ufopolitics

[solarlab]

Since there is no way to even edit a spelling mistake when you enter 
preview (it just appears to be posted and closed) - I'll put this
"waist-of-time" where it belongs - the "Big Round Bin!"

Have a good one - but a last bit of useless observation -

Fuguera's device may have also used the "Transverse Flux" scheme (Lorentz Force Law)!
Recall: Modley - ~ 1890, Fuguera - ~ 1908; just maybe...

SL

[solarlab]

How come we know about these if they're SECRET?

We actually built and tested a few Stanley Meyer devices - but don't tell anyone
we don't want to get into trouble... we blew the roof off a garage it worked so well!

Anyway, you're right again - this is just plain silly! CU

[Ufopolitics]

Since there is no way to even edit a spelling mistake when you enter
preview (it just appears to be posted and closed) -

Site works flawlessly SL, more likely it is the "User" who has no idea how it works...

When you "preview" it does NOT POST IT, but to go back to your editing window...you must scroll down...because the preview pops above editing window.

When you try to post and someone has posted already, site software gives you a WARNING in a yellow-red stripe...and all you can do is either press "Post" or go back and re edit it...or open forum in another Tab...and review there the new comment...

You have 90 MINUTES to edit your posts...isn't that enough?

I'll put this waist-of-time" where it belongs - the "Big Round Bin!"

Have a good one - but a last bit of useless observation -

It is spelled "waste" of time...waist relates to your belt waist size...

Fuguera's device may have also used the "Transverse Flux" scheme (Lorentz Force Law)!
Recall: Modley - ~ 1890, Fuguera - ~ 1908; just maybe...

SL

It is FIGUERA...not FUGUERA...

I do believe you are going to need more time for fixing your spelling errors, bro...

Ufopolitics

[solarlab]

THERE SEEMS TO BE A BIG PROBLEM HERE: 

You have been exposed to one method of GENERATING EXCESS ENERGY (EE)
but there is no discussion, questions, or anything at all about the technique
nor the method of implementation. 

No Scientific, Engineering or Technical conversation at all.

Instead, the only dialogue focuses on SPELLING, OPEN SOURCE and the media semantics.

UNBELIEVABLE, simply no words to describe such behaviour, ... no words!

Well, IMHO, that SAYS IT ALL...  So be it then... 

At least I've done my part!    And will continue to do so and move EE forward...

SL