FIGUERA'S AETHER MAGNETIC FIELDS LINEAR PUMP, REVIVED

[kampen]

@ All,

This latest proposal is, in my opinion, the most technically credible concept Ufopolitics has presented so far. 

It reduces the number of switching elements, separates the functions of the coils (bias versus excitation), and makes the experiment much easier to instrument and analyze.

However, it is important to separate the engineering from the energy claims. 

The configuration is certainly worth testing as a magnetic actuator experiment.
 
Whether it can produce more output energy than the electrical energy supplied remains an open question that only careful measurements of input power, output power, magnetic flux, and thermal losses can answer. 

Until such measurements demonstrate otherwise, there is no established evidence that the arrangement itself can exceed conventional electromagnetic behavior.

Kind regards,
Alex / @kampen

[Ufopolitics]

Hello All,

Ok, so, I have to bring up some features in order to remind about these systems...

• On ALL these Linear Systems there is ALWAYS a CENTER COIL which is ALWAYS ON.

No matter how many sequenced coils are involved.

These Center Coil is in charge to keep 'alive' the Main Field by being always ON.

NOW, ABOUT THE FIELD RESOLUTION:

On this latest Three Coils Minimalist and simplest approach...at the same time I am presenting the:

LOWEST RESOLUTION FIELD EVER PRESENTED BEFORE.

Therefore, do NOT expect it will bring a RADICAL DIFFERENCE between I/O.

It is just presented in order to demonstrate that by displacing -even on the smallest Resolution Field Displacement through Spacetime- that there is an ENERGY GENERATION on the OUTPUT CHANNEL'S.

This Energy Generation is achieved by only moving a VIRTUAL MAGNETIC FIELD SPECTRUM through a STATIC MASS OF STEEL CORE AND COPPER WIRES through SPACETIME.

I just need to prove this fact, without entering into measurements discussions about the proof that Input is greater than Output, NOT with this Minimalist Setup.

This also applies to the Five Coils setup...

Regards to All

Ufopolitics 

[kampen]

Hello, dear friend Ufopolitics,

Thank you for clarifying the intended purpose of the minimalist three-coil setup.

I understand that this configuration is not being presented as the highest-performance arrangement, but as the lowest-resolution example capable of demonstrating a spatial displacement of the magnetic field while the center reference field remains continuously energized.

I also understand your main objective:
First, to demonstrate that the changing field distribution induces measurable energy in the Main Secondary and the FC1/FC2 output coils, without immediately making this particular setup an input-versus-output efficiency demonstration.
From an experimental point of view, I agree that this is a useful first objective.

We can verify:
*  that Q3 maintains the center bias field;
* that alternating Q1 and Q2 shifts the magnetic-flux distribution;
*  that the output coils produce the expected alternating voltage;
*  how the output changes with frequency, Q3 bias current and Q1/Q2 excitation current.

For clarity, I will describe the effect in the test report as a time-varying spatial magnetic-flux distribution inside a stationary core, producing induction in stationary secondary windings.

After confirming the basic induction effect, we can proceed to loaded tests and measure the complete power balance separately.

Thank you again for explaining the intended role of this minimalist setup.

Kind regards,
 Alex / @kampen

[Ufopolitics]

Hello All,

Ok, so according to my previous post quoted below, I will resume on RPM's required CALCULATIONS, based on the Three Options with a 16 elements commutator driver that I have.

Hello to All,
[...]
So, depending on the number of elements on your commutator on a FULL Rotation of 360º you could have several Full Cycles as from there you will calculate the approximated speed you will need to achieve.

For example: If I use my Old 16 Elements Commutator with just One Brush, and connecting alternatively Full Cycles: [1,2,2,1] till 16.
I will have a total of Four Full Cycles on a 360º Full Rotation:

• Full Cycle 1 (from first 4 elements) [1,2,2,1]
• Full Cycle 2 (from other 4 elements) [1,2,2,1]
• Full Cycle 3 (from other 4 elements) [1,2,2,1]
• Full Cycle 4 (from final 4 elements) [1,2,2,1]

Resuming that a 16 Elements Commutator (using each element for each Switched ON Coil) will deliver Four Full Cycles on One (1) Revolution. (lower speed required, as lesser time ON)

Then according to this option cited above, using each commutator element for the turning ON and OFF of a single coil on the Three Coils Setup, where it will have FOUR CYCLES PER REVOLUTION:

I will need to speed the Commutator Brush to 900 RPM's to reach the 60 Hertz, or Sixty Cycles per Second.

Or you could bridge-jump every two elements and then have Two Full Cycles on One (1) Revolution with longer time per activated (ON) coil, requiring higher speed.

As on the TWO CYCLES PER REVOLUTION (cited above)

It will require a speed of 1800 RPM's to reach the 60 Hertz.

Or, completing only One (1) Full Cycle by One (1) Revolution (1:1 Scale), when jumping Four (4) Elements together to keep one switching Coil ON.
As this 1:1 Scale will require 3600 RPM's to produce 60 Hertz.(60 Full Cycles per Second)

As my previous above calculation was correct...on ONE CYCLE PER REVOLUTION:

It will require a speed of 3600 RPM's to reach the 60 Hertz.

I just wanted to clear this pending calculations about the Three Variations that we could use when testing the THREE COILS SETUP using my old 16 elements commutator driver.

Now, one thing left to add:

Whenever there is a TRANSITION between Coil One (Q1-N1) to Coil Two (Q2-N2) [or viceversa (Coil Two to One)] the Brush will be contacting BOTH COILS TERMINALS, therefore, BOTH COILS will be momentarily connected in PARALLEL.

This will cause a DROP ON RESISTANCE, therefore an INCREASE IN CURRENTS (Amperage)

We just have to be aware of this situation, everytime a Transition takes place, as how this fact will affect the Field Strength PLUS FULL SPATIAL VOLUME

• On these transitions BOTH COILS Q1 & Q2 (plus the always ON Q3) will cause a FULL THREE COILS FIELD
• At the LOWEST RESISTANCE, therefore, Higher Currents.
• These Momentary Transitions will affect FC1 & FC2 Induction at UNISON.

Then after Brush pases to a single element, (or a continuous 2,2 or 1,1)  it would then RESUME to minimize the Field to ONLY THAT SPECIFIC ON COIL, on either side of Q3 or its LINEAR TRAVEL through Spacetime.

RESUMING: That on a FULL CYCLE of Q1 & Q2 (1,2,2,1):

• Q1 will turn on first along with Q3 (always ON) Field on LEFT
• Then as Brush moves to Transition between 1-2 (ALL Three Coils ON)Field FULLY EXPANDED
• Next COIL Q2 will stay ON (Along with Q3) for TWO (2) elements continuously.(Field displaced to RIGHT)
• And again there would be another Transition between Q2 back to Q1 (ALL Three Coils ON) FIELD EXPANDED TO 3 COILS
• As to END FULL CYCLE, Brush will move BACK to single element of Q1 plus Q3 (FIELD BACK TO LEFT POSITION

Then following Full Cycle will start again according to Brush rotation which will -at the same way- will come another adjacent contact for Q1.
Remember that Full Cycles interconnect as: Full Cycle 1= 1,2,2,1 as next Full Cycle would be a repetition of previous order, or again 1,2,2,1.

Then for Example 1 with FOUR CYCLES per REVOLUTION as 900 RPM's... it will look like:
Start of Cycle 1 [1,2,2,1] Cycle 2 [1,2,2,1] Cycle 3 [1,2,2,1] Cycle 4 [1,2,2,1]
Or in a CONTINUOUS LOOP for a FULL 360º REVOLUTION: 1,2,2,1,1,2,2,1,1,2,2,1,1,2,2,1
Concluding that ALWAYS, there would be a TWO Contact ADJACENT Elements for BOTH Q1 & Q2
Plus the Transitions in between Q1-Q2 or Q2-Q1,where Field would be fully expanding because ALL THREE COILS would be ON.

That based on FIELD POSITIONING FOR EACH CYCLE [1,2,2,1] it would be like:

• FIELD ON LEFT (Q1)
• TRANSITION 1 (T1): FULL 3 COILS FIELD
• FIELD ON RIGHT (Q2)
• TRANSITION 2 (T2): FULL 3 COILS FIELD
• FIELD BACK ON LEFT (Q1)

ALL THESE CYCLES TOGETHER ON A CONTINUOUS LOOP will need to be on a Commutator Graphic to have a full grip of ALL CYCLES TOGETHER.

I will choose the 900 RPM's (OPTION # 1) for my following tests or the Four Cycles per a single Revolution, so my driver will run slower and still reaching the 60 Hertz.
As there would be less risk of Brush disconnection at higher speeds (like it did before on my previous tests)

Regards to All

Ufopolitics