FIGUERA'S AETHER MAGNETIC FIELDS LINEAR PUMP, REVIVED

[Ufopolitics]

Hello dear friend @kampen ,

You could create Two (2) versions of this Brush Assembly:

• The Full Builder Friendly Version (like the one I have corrected)
• The more Complex Engineering Version, as long as all components remain constant.

Both versions must be completely independent from each other's.
Clear Titles on the Header for each.

And again, the Brush is our Point of Reference, when calling a "View" of any of its individual components or for the whole assembled set.

Like I wrote before, the Dimensions depends on each builder's setup, basically their ID on their Commutator Diameter...as their Inner Rotor OD.
Plus their Brush size that they have available.

Therefore, the Builder's Version could have Dimensions, as long as everyone understand these measurements are purely 'RELATIVE'.

Regards

Ufopolitics

[kampen]

@ All, 

I have completed a new revision of the Rotor Brush Assembly – Complete Dimensions for Fabrication drawing.

This version now includes the fabrication dimensions for the major components, including:

• Dual-function torsion spring pin
• Torsion spring
• Upper and lower brass brush holder plates
• Carbon graphite brush
• Second attachment bolt
• Assembly views with the main reference dimensions
• Exploded assembly with numbered parts
• Brush tension adjustment procedure

My intention was to make this drawing as simple, unified and builder-friendly as possible so that anyone reproducing the machine can fabricate the brush assembly without having to search through multiple forum posts.

• Carbon brush: 11 × 11 × 20 mm
• Brass upper plate width: 22 mm
• Brass plate thickness: 6 mm
• Hole spacing: 32 mm
• Mounting holes: Ø4.2 mm
• M6 × 1.0 spring pin
• M4 × 0.7 attachment bolt

This provides all the explicit fabrication dimensions visible in the rendering.
Below are the dimensions shown in the fabrication drawing. 
All dimensions are in millimeters (mm).
1. Dual Function Torsion Spring Pin (made from regular M6 bolt)

[th]Feature[/th] [th]Dimension[/th]
Overall length	40.00
Slotted top width	4.00
Reduced diameter (spring section)	Ø3.60
Smooth spring area length	12.00
Threaded area	10.00 (M6 × 1.0)
Rotor plate area	18.00
Head diameter	Ø8.00
Rotor plate hole	Ø6.00

2. Torsion Spring

[th]Feature[/th] [th]Dimension[/th]
Active coils	6
Free height	22.00
Wire diameter	Ø1.20
Outside coil diameter	Ø8.00
Leg length	20.00
Push-end angle	60°
Inside bend radius	R0.85
Push-end height

3. Brass Brush Holder Plates
Upper Brass Housing Plate (Bent)

[th]Feature[/th] [th]Dimension[/th]
Overall top width	22.00
Side height	10.00
Plate thickness	6.00
Hole diameter	Ø4.20 (M4 clearance)
Hole center distance	32.00
Hole center to edge	11.00
Bend angle	90° each

Lower Brass Housing Plate (Flat)

[th]Feature[/th] [th]Dimension[/th]
Length	22.00
Thickness	6.00
Hole diameter	Ø4.20 (M4 clearance)
Hole center distance	32.00
Hole center to edge	11.00

4. Carbon Brush

[th]Feature[/th] [th]Dimension[/th]
Width	11.00
Height	11.00
Length	20.00

Material: Copper Graphite
5. Second Attachment Bolt

[th]Feature[/th] [th]Dimension[/th]
Head diameter	Ø8.00
Head height	3.50
Thread length	12.00
Thread	M4 × 0.7

General Drawing Notes

• Units: Millimeters
• General tolerance: ±0.10 mm unless otherwise specified.

Key Fabrication Dimensions

• Spring pin length: 40 mm
• Spring pin reduced diameter: Ø3.6 mm
• Rotor plate hole: Ø6 mm
• Spring OD: Ø8 mm
• Spring wire: Ø1.2 mm
• Carbon brush: 11 × 11 × 20 mm
• Brass upper plate width: 22 mm
• Brass plate thickness: 6 mm
• Hole spacing: 32 mm
• Mounting holes: Ø4.2 mm
• M6 × 1.0 spring pin
• M4 × 0.7 attachment bolt

This provides all the explicit fabrication dimensions visible in the rendering.

As always, thank you very much for your guidance and expertise.

Best regards, Alex

[Ufopolitics]

Hello All,
Hello dear friend @kampen,

@kampen ,

Yes, you've got it right now , dear friend!!!

I believe (and we both previously agreed through email), that we have already dedicated too much graphics and designs to this simple build related to Rotor Brushes Assembly.

**************************************

Next I will show in a short video how I got this brush setup built and assembled in a few steps...

***********************************

Again, that all depends on what you have available plus the Size of your commutator bars, your Internal diameter (ID) and your brush.

Therefore, the measurements here are RELATIVE, So, I would only be referred to as PROPORTIONAL RELATIONSHIP MEASUREMENTS on this Post.

I recommend to use a short, but heavy brush. (This way centrifugal forces will act stronger based on brush weight) adding by rotational speed.

We could also add a small weight to brush on the back (where spring pushes brush) like a very small rear copper or brass cap, adding soldering to add weight.

Also, if your brush have a factory wire mesh coming out from it...to make sure this wire mesh have flexible freedom (never tense or tight!!) allowing brush to move-slide freely within it's housing.

Again, related to proportions on your brush & Commutator Bars..:

• Brush MUST always be the exact WIDTH size of one commutator contact WIDTH size...And:
• NEVER shorter than one comm. bar!!...Plus:
• Ideal size would be that Brush is a bit BIGGER in width than one comm. bar!
• The Commutator Bars must ALWAYS be greater in HEIGHT than Brush HEIGHT.
• These commutators HEIGHT related to Brush height, must be EVENLY distributed.
• Allowing the same proportional height (related to brush) on Commutator Bars.
• To Top & Bottom.

The Torsion Spring does NOT needs to be adjusted with too much pressure.
Actually, for this setup, where Centrifugal Forces are assisting, the Torsion Spring only serves to keep brush in place.

Always it is recommended a CONTACT TESTING, with Incandescent Bulbs, before running the Sequential Coils.

Number of Bulbs will depend on your number of sequential coils on your setup.

The GROUP of Bulbs that would be displacing -on your setup- must never even blink!

Basically your INNER GROUP COILS, Example: If you have a Group of Eight Coils displacing:

The INNER SIX BULBS must always keep a CONSTANT BRIGHTNESS!!

And so on for a smallest Group Testing, like 3 Groups on the Five Total Sequential Coils, where the CENTER Group Bulb must be bright at all times, while displacing along it's Three Steps.

First Test at Low Speed, where consistency of Group of Bulbs translating and lit, is constant.

Then Medium Speed, to then Top Operating Speed.

If they start blinking on either Medium or High Speed...then Torsion Spring needs more positive (increasing) push pressures.

Until you see a constant on all your Group number of bulbs, steadily keeping their brightness at FULL Operating Speed (1800-2000 RPM's)

Regards

Ufopolitics

[kampen]

Hello my dear friend @Ufopolitics,

I have been studying resonant magnetic system, and it raised an interesting question regarding our Mechanical Commutator and SSD Linear Generator.

One of the biggest challenges with almost every resonant electrical system is that, as soon as a load is connected, the magnetic field becomes harder to maintain. 

The load usually introduces additional damping, changes the Q-factor, and sometimes even shifts the resonant frequency.

This made me wonder about your Mechanical Generator.

From your experience and all the testing you have done, did you observe anything similar? 

When you connected increasingly loads, did the Main Magnetic Field remain stable, or did you notice that the magnetic field weakened and required more input power to maintain the same operating conditions?

I am especially interested in whether your moving magnetic field generated by the Mechanical Commutator naturally isolates the excitation field from the output load, or whether the output load still feeds back into the excitation system.

Your practical experience with the mechanical setup would be extremely valuable, as it may help us better understand how to optimally configuring the SSD version.

Looking forward to hearing your thoughts, my dear friend.

Best regards, Alex 

[Art Z.]

Hello all,

Wow, looks like Alex is reading my mind. I was going through my past experiences in induction coil operations, and he is mentioning the same effects as I was going to relearn how it exactly works. On old cars induction coil current being turned on and off with a contact that opens and closes mechanically creating magnetic field collapse in induction coil which produces high voltage spikes then it's being distributed to spark plugs. I'm sure that high voltage discharge also creates flyback current to primary coil which is directly connected to a capacitor near the on/off contact which I'm assuming collects these charges then uses it back to feed the primary coil somehow. On modern cars same process is happening to run an engine only on/off switching is being done electronically and I don't have a deep knowledge how it exactly works. One more note: old cars Induction coils work with 12 volts and produces 14-17 kv and modern cars work with 5-7 volts producing 40-45 kv.  I'm sure Mr. Ufo has clearer answer to this very interesting question.

Regards!