FIGUERA'S AETHER MAGNETIC FIELDS LINEAR PUMP, REVIVED

[kampen]

Reply to Ufopolitics Message (#718)

Hello, my dear friend Ufopolitics,
Thank you again for your detailed analysis. 

This is a very important point you are raising regarding selector positioning versus the window progression, 
and I truly appreciate the depth of your observation.
 
Clarification of My Current Topology
You are absolutely correct that, in a pure node-to-node interpretation, energizing Q2 + Q3 would correspond to:

Code Select Expand

+V at N1 and return at N3
And your observation is also valid that:

Code Select Expand

SR3 placed at N4

Code Select Expand

→

Code Select Expand

could imply Q2 + Q3 + Q4 conduction path
👉 This is exactly where my implementation differs slightly from the conceptual diagram.
 
Important Distinction (Key Point)
My current setup is not a direct "node shorting" system, but rather:

Code Select Expand

👉

Code Select Expand

A controlled conduction window using selector pairs
Meaning:

• Each selector does not simply connect a node to +V or GND directly
• Instead, it defines the boundary of the conduction path

So in the state:

Code Select Expand

SL1 + SR3 active
The intended current path is:

Code Select Expand

+V

Code Select Expand

→

Code Select Expand

N1

Code Select Expand

→

Code Select Expand

Q2

Code Select Expand

→

Code Select Expand

N2

Code Select Expand

→

Code Select Expand

Q3

Code Select Expand

→

Code Select Expand

N3

Code Select Expand

→

Code Select Expand

GND
👉 Even though SR3 is physically at N4, 
The effective conduction boundary is controlled by the switching overlap and impedance path, not just geometric position.
 
Your 3-Window Interpretation (Fully Agreed)
Your diagram of:

Code Select Expand

Q1+Q2

Code Select Expand

→

Code Select Expand

Q2+Q3

Code Select Expand

→

Code Select Expand

Q3+Q4
is absolutely the correct logical sliding window sequence.
And yes:

Code Select Expand

👉

Code Select Expand

3 windows

Code Select Expand

→

Code Select Expand

6 transitions per full cycle
This is perfectly aligned with the original concept.
 
The "Unpaired Selector" Issue (Very Important)
You raised a critical point:

Code Select Expand

Center node (N2) switching polarity
This is indeed the core limitation of the 4-coil / 2-window reduction.
👉 In my current approach:

• I avoid switching a node from negative → positive directly
• Instead, I rely on:

Code Select Expand

make-before-break overlap + controlled current path
But I fully agree:

Code Select Expand

❗

Code Select Expand

This is NOT structurally identical to the original 15-coil system
 
About Your 5-Coil Suggestion
Your proposal:

Code Select Expand

5 coils

Code Select Expand

→

Code Select Expand

3-coil window
is extremely interesting and actually solves:

• ✔ Selector symmetry
• ✔ Center coil behavior (like coil #8 in original)
• ✔ Proper separation of positive and negative selector groups

Code Select Expand

N0 N1 N2

Code Select Expand

→

Code Select Expand

+ side

Code Select Expand

N3 N4 N5

Code Select Expand

→

Code Select Expand

−

Code Select Expand

side
👉 This is indeed a closer topological match to the original system.
 
My Current Objective (Why I chose 4 coils)
At this stage, I am intentionally simplifying to:

Code Select Expand

👉

Code Select Expand

Minimum system that still shows sliding excitation behavior
Focus:

• switching validation
• current continuity
• timing / overlap behavior

NOT yet:

• full symmetry reproduction
• exact original architecture

 
Your Suggestion Going Forward
I see two clear paths now:
Path A (current)

• 4 coils
• 2-coil window
• simpler hardware
• partial topology approximation

Path B (your proposal)

• 5 coils
• 3-coil window
• true center-coil behavior
• much closer to original system

👉 I fully agree that Path B is superior structurally
 
Conclusion
Your observations are absolutely correct regarding:

• selector positioning ambiguity
• center node behavior
• lack of symmetry in 4-coil reduction

And your 5-coil / 3-window model is a very strong improvement toward the original architecture.
 
Next Step
I will:

• complete current 4-coil switching validation
• then strongly consider upgrading to:

Code Select Expand

👉

Code Select Expand

5-coil / 3-window configuration
To better replicate:

Code Select Expand

original 15-coil system behavior
Your input is helping refine this design in a very meaningful way 👍
Regards, Alex

[worldcup]

@kampen (Alex), @Ufopolitics - Seeing this kind of dedication to open research is truly inspiring. The world needs more people pushing the boundaries of what's possible. Thank you for investing your effort into a potential future of free energy. Huge respect! 👏

Regards

[kampen]

Subject Ref.: Custom Bobbins for 4-Coil SSD Test Setup (Horizontal Layout)

I wanted to share the custom bobbins I will be using for my small-scale 4-coil SSD (Figuera-type) test setup.
 
Bobbin Design Overview
The images show:

• ✔ Square-window bobbins (3D printed)
• ✔ Matching clamp frames (two-piece design)
• ✔ Non-conductive materials (PLA/PA-type plastics)
• ✔ Identical geometry for all coils

The square opening is designed to fit a horizontal PA6 (nylon) core rail, which will be used purely for:

Code Select Expand

Mechanical alignment (not magnetic coupling)
 
Intended Configuration

• Coils will be wound and mounted horizontally
• All bobbins are aligned along a single axis (Q1–Q4)
• Equal spacing: 25 mm
• Fixed using nylon clamp brackets on an HDPE base

 
Design Goals
These bobbins are optimized for:

• Consistent winding geometry
• Repeatable inductance across all coils
• Clean mechanical alignment
• Easy future upgrade (adding ferrite or laminated cores if needed)

 
Build Considerations
Planned precautions:

• All coils are wound in the same direction
• An equal number of turns per coil
• Leads kept consistent in length
• No metal parts inside the coil window
• Good access to tap nodes (N0–N4)

 
Purpose
At this stage, the goal is to:

• Validate the sliding current window behavior
• Measure current continuity during switching
• Observe magnetic field displacement along the coil chain

So the setup will initially be air-core / open magnetic path, using the PA6 rod only for structure.

Next step is winding and assembling the full 4-coil chain.

Regards, Alex

[kampen]

Dear Worldcup,

Thank you, I really appreciate your kind words.

At this stage, the focus is very much on careful experimentation and verification, not on making any claims. 

What we are trying to do here is:

• understand the switching behavior clearly
• measure everything properly
• share results openly so others can reproduce or challenge them

That is why the detailed discussions with Ufopolitics and others are so valuable; 
they help catch issues early and improve the design before drawing conclusions.

If anything comes out of this, it will be because of transparent testing, good data, and collaboration, not assumptions.
Thanks again for the encouragement.

Regards, Alex

[Ufopolitics]

Hello my dear friend @kampen,

Thanks for the detailed explanations to my doubts!!

So, based on your previous Gate Signals Graphic that you have posted before (I Crop it to just the signals):

As I understand on above Diagram basically showing only the TRANSITION between Two Coil's Group, based on Gate Signals:

• You keep the V+ or SL1 at an ON Signal during the whole Time-Transition period (Red Signal)
• Then you use SR2 & SR3 to Control -via Ground Return- the Timing Exposure during the Transition Window
• While SLO is Open on this Time-Window.

Putting in simple words: You keep SL1 ON (the High Side Positive Signal) during the Full Window Exposure, while using the Return to Ground (-) to Modify the Transition Timing through SR2 & SR3.

If this is correct, then can you please make this same Diagram, but showing Q1, Q2, Q3 & Q4 on the FULL TIME Transitions you will be applying for this test?

In order that ALL Four Coils are set on Diagram above reflecting their time ON-OFF, PLUS Overlap (OL) and the Gate Signals below...or something like this I made BLANK (No signals shown):

On above Blank Graphic (No Signals) I have set a Frame Time for each Coil (ON-OFF) plus the Overlap (OL) Timing on the Green Shaded Area on an orderly fashion.

Now, you could expand or reduce either one of their timings spacings to your like, to adapt the signals to your timing window size.

This way we could have a FULL View over Time therefore, a clear understanding on your Testing Signals for the whole test on ALL Four Coils.

We really do appreciate all your time dedicated to this project!!

Thanks!!

Regards 

Ufopolitics