FIGUERA'S AETHER MAGNETIC FIELDS LINEAR PUMP, REVIVED

[kampen]

Subject Re: Upper View and Elevation Cut – CAD Alignment Method

Hello dear friend Ufopolitics,

Yes, that approach makes complete sense, and I follow the same logic.
Doing the upper view and elevation cut together in the same 1:1 scaled file is the correct way to guarantee alignment.

Using the shared centerlines, bolt patterns, shaft axis, and fastener references ensures that the elevation view is not just visually correct, but mechanically true to the upper view.

Once everything is fully constrained and verified, separating the elevation into its own file is straightforward and avoids cumulative alignment errors later on.

This is especially important with stacked assemblies like yours, where shaft, bearings, slip rings, commutators, and plates all depend on the same reference geometry.

The combined view you have shown is very clear, and it confirms that all plates, fasteners, and rotating elements are properly aligned.

Good and solid CAD practice.

Regards, Alex