FIGUERA'S AETHER MAGNETIC FIELDS LINEAR PUMP, REVIVED

[Ufopolitics]

Hello All,

On this video, since I have ALL Sequential Coils Compacted to main Secondary, I wanted to conduct this Test, where I am showing the FULL Displacement of Magnetic Field from Group #1 to Group #8, analizing displacement based on the Bloch Wall -CENTER OF FIELD- positioning.

And below is a composed image of both Frames, Group #1 & Group #8:

Regards

Ufopolitics

[Ufopolitics]

Hello everyone out there...

I was working on the connections to the PFET & NFET drivers (Version #!) no overlap...

I want to take it for a "Test Drive" before adding Second Secondaries...Just the Main Secondary...and  see  what it can do?

I want to make Two Tests...One with just the Outer Steel Clamps...

And a Second Test with the Inner Clamps mounted on,,,

Then compare Output results...?

So, First, I made all Power Connectors...

Second,, connectors to each Sequential Coil made out of 23 gauge wire...isolated with the spaghetti cover:     

And, finally...I  have all connected to the Generator:

I am ready to Test Drive it.., Are You?

See You tomorrow...

Regards

Ufopolitics



                         

[kampen]

Hello dear friend,  Ufopolitics,

That sounds like a solid plan. Doing an initial test with just the Main Secondary, and then comparing results with and without the inner clamps, should give very clear and useful data.

Nice work, getting all the power and coil connectors finished that is a big step.
Looking forward to seeing what the first test drive shows.

Good luck with the tests tomorrow.

Regards, Alex

[Ufopolitics]

Hello All,

Ok, so here is the video about Testing the Version 1 (No Overlap):

And, as you can see it did not turned out successful.

The basic issue I am seeing is that the INPUT Sinewave is basically an AC Sinewave...and it is NOT supposed to be so.

I know perfectly well that we are never be able to see a "perfect" Square Wave because once it gets connected with coils, it tends to round up a bit the top, HOWEVER, it is supposed to be MUCH LARGER on the Positive side than on the negative side...

And what we are seeing here is a "perfect" AC Sinewave, that goes High peak, then goes down PASSING BY ZERO and is perfectly EQUAL on the Negative side...NOT GOOD!

Therefore we get all mixed up and opposite reactions than we should have...like when we increase frequency, instead of gaining Output Voltage, we get Voltage Drop.

And if you notice, when I increase frequency, the INPUT AMPS start coming down...so FIELD LOSE STRENGTH.

Also, I have set the Input Probes on #1 Negative (Blue Channel) and #8 Positive (Magenta or Purple Channel) ...so, these TWO Signals are supposed to be a bit OFF SET...and they are NOT...They are "perfectly"aligned peak to peak at Vertical Alignment.(NOT Good either)

Any suggestions or comments are welcome...

I am working on getting the V2 wired up to Test it later on...

Regards

Ufopolitics

[Ufopolitics]

ANALYSIS OF THE SIGNALS PLUS SCOPE SPEC'S ON LATEST TESTING

Hello to All,

Below is an Image taken of the Scope Signals, while I was performing the latest Test:

And below is the same image, where I have added all the Specifications Highlighted for the Analysis:

Ok, so first:

The running Frequency is at 31.12 Hertz/ Sampling Frame Time Capturing is at 20 milliseconds (20.0 ms)

1- I have set a Green dotted line for Zero-line level.

2- I have set Horizontal lines to define each of the Peaks for all sines.

2a- Red dotted Lines are set for All Negative Signals (below zero)

2b- Yellow dotted line for Positive Peak Output.

2c- Light Blue dotted line for Both Input Sines.

3- Scope Channel Settings are:

3a- All Three Channels are set EQUALLY at 5.0 Volts per each square on Screen Grid at Scope Spec's.

3b- All Physical Scopes are set at 10X (set at each Scope Probe Switch)

All these settings on Scope and Probes were done in order that Signals do not exceed screen size.

Basically, this Analysis is NOT AT ALL, about discussions if Output Signal on Scope is "bigger" or "Greater" than both Input Signals...NOPE!

What I would like to point out, I basically did it, at the previous video, with the observation of the Sequential Coils floating back and forth...

But, adding here a deeper analysis about the Two Input Signals shape and form...

First, I want to clear up something I said WRONG at previous video...and that was that the Input Signals "Collapse"...no, they do not!!

Both Input Signals SMOOTHLY fall over time -NOT in a steep, vertical line, like a typical "collapsing" takes place- to the point that the ASCENDING other Signal CROSSES at a specific timing, and at a precise, repeated, perfectly defined LEVEL, which I called "Overlapping or Crossing Points-line" (not shown on image)

On the Physical Sequential Coils Assembly, this Crossing Point should take place around the EXACT CENTER of ALL Seven Coils, IF, All Coils are SECURED AND TIGHT.

And for this latest Video, all sequential Coils were loose...so this crossing points-line, was like "floating" back and forth...and even so, they still show a consistent alignment.

The Resistance that each sequential coil has, is the main cause for this smooth ascending and fall of the Input Positive Sine Signals. However, when they reach the End travel of each displacement FALL, is when the sum of ALL Coils resistances involved on the fall, leaves a NEGATIVE Trace, below zero.

We can interpret this under zero signal as a PARTIAL COLLAPSE (not a full collapse, since none of these coils ever turns off) and I see it as a Magnetic Field Inertia reversal, where after it was fully powered, it starts losing currents, because the adding of subsequential coil's resistances on the series connections...then it "tends to reverse"...but it never does...it is just like a "less Northern Polarization" than previous one, when it was fully powered, without any resistance because brush was directly feeding it.

And honestly, on this point, is where the Two Input AC Caps that I have installed at both input points [1 & 8] play a decisive role, as not allowing the Field and so the Signal, to fully drop on the negative side.

If I take these two caps off, the negative spikes at input, would be galore during the operation.

Finally, a question that I even asked myself at certain point...as is:

Why if there are Two Positive Input Signals...the Secondary Coil delivers such a neat, clean, AC Sinewave, that goes precisely the same height point level, to Positive Peak to Negative Peak passing by zero line?

First, what the Scope Probes at INPUT receives, are simply Two Positive Signals, NEVER FULLY Negative (except by the Inertial Field small travel), so it reflects exactly what they "scope" on the screen.

Input Scope Probes do NOT capture the TRAVELING SPATIAL DIRECTION of those Two Positive Signals in real, physical world coordinates, related to our setup.

Much less the Scope Probes "know" that Both Signals are COMPLETELY OPPOSED ONE TO EACH OTHER'S on Real World Coordinates...

But our extended Inner Secondary Coil, which is expanded along both opposed traveling Input Signals does.

For the Secondary Coil, it is a FULLY and DEFINITIVE Positive and Negative Field Displacement along its windings...and so, the Yellow Probe connected to its terminals reads exactly what is going on...a Positive and then a Negative sinewave.


Regards to All


Ufopolitics

Hello All,

Ok, it took me a while to search for this Quoted Post above...long time ago...Feb 11, 2024!!

However, the point is to observe the PERFECT INPUT SIGNALS also represented by Blue and Purple Channels (is my Pattern) as the OUTPUT is on Ch 1 (Yellow)...exactly the same arrangement I have now.

Anyways, this is the RIGHT WAY that the INPUT SINES should look like, meaning HIGHER ON POSITIVE SIDE than on Negative...which is just a minor opposite spike.

Of course, this was done with the Mechanical Rotary Commutator, and the higher I could go was at 31 Hertz, before starting to lose brush contacts...
Also, the Method was based on just switching the Positive Brush...identical to Figuera 1908 Patent...and after analyzing this method...the Field keeps varying its currents on the OPPOSITE WAY than it is supposed to be.

Meaning, when Field EXPANDS (that's when it needs FULL CURRENTS) but instead it was when lesser currents were provided to field due to  resistance increased.

Still, I had pretty good results back then...

Regards

Ufopolitics