FIGUERA'S AETHER MAGNETIC FIELDS LINEAR PUMP, REVIVED

[kampen]

Both diagrams are GOOD!

However, with the single version I have no idea what Induction Voltages will do without extinguishing diodes.
I'll makeschematic for this.

Greetings, Alex

[kampen]

I'll make schematic for this.

Greetings, Alex

[Ufopolitics]

Hello Kampen,

I believe that is a great idea!!

I have been using two running AC Caps that normally Brushless Generators use at their Stator Field, I use them at BOTH Points, 1 and Negative and second at 8 and Negative.
As in those two points [1 & 8] is where I connect the Scope Probes.
These caps dampen a LOT the sparking on commutator, as the sines on scope are no longer "spiky".

Below is a Drawing I have already posted here, where I was measuring the Self Inductance on Exciters.
But the point is to show where I have connected the two AC Caps (C1 & C2) Plus the Cap's spec's.

Many thanks for this idea, I believe it is going to work out great!!

Regards

Ufopolitics

[Ufopolitics]

DEEPER ANALYSIS OF METHOD 2, SINGLE MODULE FLAW

Hello to All,

On this Post, I want to go over again on the "flaw part" that I saw on Method 2, having a Single Module, and that I have written about it many times on this Topic...
then I will go on to Analyze further on, the advantages of Method 2 having Two Modules on a separate post.

So, this time, I want to go on detail about this 'unbalanced' operation of the Single Operation System.

To do this properly, I have made a new Diagram shown above, about the Single Module Operation, basically at its 'CRITICAL' Points 1 & 8.

DESCRIPTION AND MODE OF OPERATION

First, it consists of Two Field Coils, F1 & F2, and I named their INNER Magnetic Fields NORTH POLES as A for F1, and B for F2, each Field Coil have 12.5 Ohms resistance each.

Then, between the Two Fields, extends SEVEN Switching Coils, which resistance is of approximately 3.2 Ohms each.

The way BOTH INNER Field Poles interact, is by having Two North Poles in Repulsion, that I assigned a Blue Circle with two NN in Blue.

So, every time we are switching a Positive charge through the Eight [8[ contacts, we are DISPLACING this Repulsion Circle back and forth...

This constant back-forth movement of BOTH REPULSION FIELDS (the Blue Circle) at UNISON, generates an Induction on an inner Secondary (not shown on image) as you all have seen on my previous videos.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE CRITICAL POINTS 1 & 8

POINT 1: Every time the Positive reaches Point 1 during the SEQUENCING, FIELD POLE B have EXPANDED to its MAXIMUM VOLUME Expression, while FIELD POLE A have RETRACTED to its MINIMAL VOLUME Expression.

At this Contacting Point 1, the FIELD COIL 1 is receiving FULL POWER at only 12.5 Ohms resistance, while the FIELD COIL 2, have ADDED ALL SEVEN (7) Exciting Coils RESISTANCE plus its own, on its EXPANSION.

Now, let's pause here...because what is described above is FLAW#1!

According to Figuera's original Patent from 1908 and his "Theoretical Resistance Variations" description, every time the Field EXPANDS is because its Resistances had been REDUCED, as when Field RETRACTS its Resistance have INCREASED to its MAX Values.

And we are having the COMPLETE OPPOSITE OPERATION based on the previously described functionality of a Single Module based on Method 2.

And the same, exact 'modum operandi' takes place whenever Positive contacts Point 8. except that operation has reversed towards FIELD 2, POLE B.

This wrong operation causes the Field Coils 1 & 2 to tend to heat up at normal sequential speed, simply because both fields are getting majority of the 'power heat' every 180º.

But MORE CRITICAL is the fact that whenever the EXCITING FIELD EXPANDS, it INCREASES its RESISTANCE, then INDUCTANCE DECAYS, FALLS, DROP DOWN...This causes that Expanded Field LOOSE MAGNETIC PRESSURE...
While the RETRACTED FIELD, which is using MUCH LESS SPATIAL VOLUME, is GAINING PRESSURES as its RESISTANCE IS REDUCED to MINIMAL VALUES.

EDIT 1: I wanted to add that NOT ONLY this wrong 'Algorithm' takes place at Contacts 1 & 8, BUT through the whole sequencing travel, it is just that the resistance values are not as critical that those at MAX POINTS OF TRAVEL 1 & 8.

Even so, on my test videos, I was showing a pretty good gain on Output Voltage versus Input Voltage, HOWEVER, Output Amperage did NOT INCREASE compared to Input Amperage, INSTEAD it decreased.

If we analyze a typical Rotary Generator Exciting Field, it NEVER CHANGES its MAGNETIC FIELD PRESSURES, because Resistance is at ALL TIMES Constant, as Voltages AND AMPERAGE keep UNCHANGED thanks to the AVR (Automatic Voltage Regulator).
So, whenever we add a load to a rotary generator, due to the magnetizing of its Output Fields, it tends to lock up, and then the ICE Engine opens up its throttle and raise its Torque and Speed.

Resuming, this Figuera Generator needs -at least- for the Displacing-Exciting Fields to KEEP EQUAL RESISTANCE VALUES, that way keeping its INDUCTANCE VALUES ALSO EQUAL, which means its EMF CAPACITY CONSTANT...as Magnetic Pressures will ALWAYS REMAIN THE SAME, STEADY.

And the Single Module Method 2 did NOT achieve that.

However, I have already FIXED this issue with the Design of a Dual Module System, where BOTH, Positive and Negative contacts are switching at UNISON.

Regards

Ufopolitics

Again, I may keep editing this post...

[Ufopolitics]

THE TWO MODULES CLOSED SYSTEM BASED ON METHOD 2

Hello to All,

Ok, on the following two Drawings I am showing the differences between Single Module seen before (and that I have added up at bottom of each image for easier comparison) versus the Two Module System in a closed core structure at the critical (extreme) Points 1 & 8.

DIAGRAM 1- POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE CONTACTS ARE SIMULTANEOUSLY AT POINT ONE (1)

First, please, do not get scared because it may seem "too complicated"...LOL.

All has been done is to REPLICATE ALL Seven Sequential Ring Coils and ROTATE THEM 180º.

Both Field Coils (F1 & F2) are being SHARED between the Two Modules Sequential Ring Coils.

DESCRIPTION OF THE MAIN, BASIC CONFIGURATION

We have a closed Toroid Steel Core (that on previous posts I have disclosed how to make it in order we could take it apart).

There are Two Sets of Sequential Ring Coils of SEVEN COILS each, located at upper and lower section of Toroid,

These Two Sets of Sequential Coils SHARE THE SAME FIELD COILS F1 & F2, where F1 (on LEFT) have Magnetic Poles A (North) and C (South) and F2 (on RIGHT) have Magnetic Poles B (North) and D (South)

ALL Sequential Coils and Field Coils are CONNECTED IN SERIES.

Now, if you all noticed the MODULE 1 (lower) its Contact Points run, (from Left to Right) 1 to 8, while the MODULE 2 (upper) its Contacts Points (also from Left to Right) run from 8 to 1...meaning OPPOSITE.

I have set an "IMAGINARY ROTATION LINE" in Green, which rotates according to Black Arrows, back and forth.

The Two POWER INPUT Contact Triangles-Arrows, Positive in Red and Negative in Black, both with the Electrical signs (+/-) inside the Triangle.

Now, please note that these Two Power Input Arrows ALWAYS would be set at 180º apart, whenever moving from 1 to 8 and from 8 to 1, as the Imaginary Rotation Line serving as a Location Positioning for both Input Points.

MODULE 1 runs TWO NORTH REPULSION POLES (NN) at ALL TIMES.

MODULE  2 runs TWO SOUTH REPULSION POLES (SS) at ALL TIMES.

POWER INPUT FOR POSITIVE & NEGATIVE AT POINT 1

So, when Both Power Sequence Arrows are at Point 1, the Pole B (North) from F2 have EXPANDED TO ITS MAXIMUM Spatial displacement, while the Pole A from F1 has retracted to its Minimal Expression.

But now let's see what is going on at MODULE 2...at this same Point 1.

First the South Pole C from F1, have EXPANDED TO ITS MAXIMUM Spatial Displacement, while the Pole D (also South) have RETRACTED to its MINIMAL Expression.

Concluding that TWO OPPOSITE POLES (C North, B South) are traveling in complete opposition, one from F1 and the other from F2.

POWER INPUT FOR POSITIVE & NEGATIVE AT POINT 8

When Both Power Inputs are at Point 8, the complete opposite to Point 1 takes place.

At MODULE 1, F1 Pole A (North) have reached its MAXIMUM EXPANSION, while B (North) has RETRACTED.
At MODULE 2, F2 Pole D (South) have EXPANDED TO MAX VALUES, while C (South) have RETRACTED at MINIMAL EXPRESSION.

Now, more importantly is to observe that by moving the Input Power Points this way, we will ALWAYS HAVE EIGHT TOTAL SET OF COILS IN EACH MODULE, 1 & 2 AT ANY POINT OF DISPLACEMENT POINTS 1 TO 8.

Again, I will review this post tomorrow, as it may have type errors plus I will keep adding more important explanations.

Regards and good evening.


Ufopolitics