FIGUERA'S AETHER MAGNETIC FIELDS LINEAR PUMP, REVIVED

[Cornboy]

 Thanks UFO, for all your time consuming work, and particularly your excellent explanations in drawing form.

 I Take it that the secondary is wound under sequential coils, directly on the Core?


 Regards  Cornboy,     

[Ufopolitics]

Thanks UFO, for all your time consuming work, and particularly your excellent explanations in drawing form.

 I Take it that the secondary is wound under sequential coils, directly on the Core?


 Regards  Cornboy,     

Thanks Cornboy!

Yes, exactly like that, Secondary is underneath all sequential coils.
We are just dealing here with the exciter coils.

Regards friend

Ufopolitics

[Ufopolitics]

I can see you have corrected polarity of field coils ... as long as they are separate coils they should have the polarity shown on last diagram otherwise they will oppose magnetic flux.

Exactly Classic!!
We had a working Module based on a Positive switching Input and a stationary/fixed Negative, where the Polarity of the Two Fields had South on outer and North facing inwards (towards Repulse Field)
And I had it reversed on wrong image...so everything else (basically the other two Fields had also wrong poles setting).

I still have a question for you: why other coils are not oriented N-S or S-N on diameter, I mean both positive to N and both negative to S diametrical opposed ... probably I don't understand how you connect them through the switch

Because then you will end up with a N, next to another N...as an S next to another S...it don't work that way.

It always must be alternated polarizations or N-S-N-S

This is the way Brushed Motors also work...Negative brushes are facing each other's as also Positive Brushes are diametrically set, at 180 degrees.

I guess that answers your question, if I understood you well.

Let me know.

Cheers

Ufopolitics

[Ufopolitics]

Hello,

Ok, so, the two Modules that are being switched by a Positive Input, are IDENTICAL to the single Module I had shown before, Picture below:

Except, by taking off the secondaries...and only looking at the exciting coils and the two Fields.

Now, if we look at Diagram above, the Positive Input Full Module, from Field 1 (F1) to Field 4 (F4) have the same Poles Structure as the First Diagram of a Single Module, Positive Input, N Repulsion.

So, I had Copied and Duplicated this FULL Positive Module (Including its Two Fields), and set it across at 180 degrees, in a Mirror type set.

Then I have added two Negative Input Switching Coils ONLY (Without Fields)...and they are set across, the same way as Positives is set...in order that Alternated Modules will receive Positive-Negative from both ends...

On this design we have Four sets of Switching Coils, however, we only have Four (4) Fields interlaced between all four sets...because Negative Switchers are SHARING FIELDS FROM POSITIVE Modules.

I believe this setup, so far, would be the best one I have designed.

Only thing here, is that we have a Toroid, Structure which are a pain in the neck to wind...and I do not have a Toroid Winder...So, I am looking now at a way to make a Steel Modular Core, that we can take it apart, add coils and then screw it up...or wrap it up...to perform testing, of course.

Once we have a working model, then...would be "Toroid Winding Time"...

Regards

Ufopolitics

[Cornboy]

 Hi UFO and all, how would the secondary be designed? one continuous winding around the core, or broken up into separate sections?

 Regards  Cornboy.