About Overunity Machines Site

[citfta]

Classic,

I am not going to make any comments about your theories concerning magnets.  But please knock off all the negative comments about mainstream scientists.  We heard you the first 20 times you said them.  If it wasn't for the "mainstream scientists" you wouldn't even have the abiltiy to express your opinions on a forum like this.  You would still be milking the cows and tending the garden for something to eat.  You would be riding your donkey or walking to get to where ever you wanted to go.  And this topic does not belong in this thread.  It belongs in the theory thread that was just created for these kinds of comments.

Respectfully,
Carroll

[Classic]

Agree, many times I am just carried away, apologies for inconvenience, please move/delete/edit as appropriate.

[Classic]

We have to agree that some certain facts may be considered offensive or seen as offensive depending on where the observation point is.

If we, here may find some certain effects that goes against known laws of physics or can not be explained without making exceptions from such "laws" we should reasonably consider a reaction will occur.

Hard to find the right answer/approach, but try to put yourself in their shoes. For long time we can see in humanity a certain path of "evolution" and might be easy to visualise the time of Galileo Galilei and The Inquisition. People with different knowledge sometimes in empirical mode gain were accused of against the God practice exploiting certain effects which could not be explained by the mainstream science in the form of "know all"- religion and how this have been reflected when they went against Galileo Galilei were this remarkable man was able to prove and explain his theories and practical applications but leading with him being released from custody as long as he accepted a public declaration in accordance with the Inquisition.

So, naysayers will keep coming here whatever your policy is and they will keep saying nasty things, but as long as they can't prove something fundamental wrong or prove that their view is not flawed we should treat them as such.

I wouldn't ban them in such way, as they may understand later (or never) some certain things. We need to make a difference between those brainwashed and those with knowledge. And just suppress the nuisance not access to knowledge. We can be better than this.

So, are we going to spend our time to find and explain the flaws or we continue our path and give them opportunity to see and understand their mistakes.

[Ufopolitics]

Hello UFOpolitics!

I posted, in my facebook, a post about your findings. Yesterday on messenger I received a message from a searcher from the city of Kharkov (the city which is constantly bombed and shelled with missiles by the Russians)..

Коли я побачив ваш пост про майстра-винахідника, я все зрозумів, купив дріт, трансформатор. Сталевий. Але ніяк не міг його завести. Думав день і ніч, шукав причину. Сьогодні запустив. Ще не автономний - перевіряв від розетки. Але головне, що генерація в соленоїді є !!! Далі спробую запустити від акумулятора з перспективою автономності. Вже є ідеї. Радість переповнює!!!!

----------------------------------------------


When I saw your post about the master inventor, I understood everything, bought the wire and the transformer. A steel one. But I couldn't get it to work. I thought day and night, looking for the reason. Today I started it up. It's not yet autonomous - I checked it from the outlet. But the main thing is that there is generation in the solenoid!!! Next, I will try to run it on battery power with the prospect of autonomy. I already have ideas. I am overwhelmed with joy!!!!

I don't know the details, we corresponded with him about the magnetic motor. I will provide you with details.  Slowly the idea went to the people and I am very glad and congratulate you with it!

Thanks Rakarskiy,

It is very comforting and inspiring, to know that someone, under such war conflicts, is still able to build my setup!!

I wish him the best of luck on his development!!

Thanks for uploading this!!

Kind regards

Ufopolitics 

[Ufopolitics]

We have to agree that some certain facts may be considered offensive or seen as offensive depending on where the observation point is.

If we, here may find some certain effects that goes against known laws of physics or can not be explained without making exceptions from such "laws" we should reasonably consider a reaction will occur.

Hard to find the right answer/approach, but try to put yourself in their shoes. For long time we can see in humanity a certain path of "evolution" and might be easy to visualise the time of Galileo Galilei and The Inquisition. People with different knowledge sometimes in empirical mode gain were accused of against the God practice exploiting certain effects which could not be explained by the mainstream science in the form of "know all"- religion and how this have been reflected when they went against Galileo Galilei were this remarkable man was able to prove and explain his theories and practical applications but leading with him being released from custody as long as he accepted a public declaration in accordance with the Inquisition.

So, naysayers will keep coming here whatever your policy is and they will keep saying nasty things, but as long as they can't prove something fundamental wrong or prove that their view is not flawed we should treat them as such.

I wouldn't ban them in such way, as they may understand later (or never) some certain things. We need to make a difference between those brainwashed and those with knowledge. And just suppress the nuisance not access to knowledge. We can be better than this.

So, are we going to spend our time to find and explain the flaws or we continue our path and give them opportunity to see and understand their mistakes.

You are completely right, Classic.

Regards

Ufopolitics