Electromagnetic Generator Theory

[Ufopolitics]

@rakarskiy , how do you account for the energy stored in a permanent magnet ? I am not aware of any study anywhere in the world for this.

AI Response:

The energy stored in a permanent magnet is called "magnetic energy" and is essentially the potential energy contained within the aligned magnetic domains within the material, which generates a magnetic field; this energy can be calculated by considering the magnetic flux density (B) and magnetic field strength (H) of the magnet, along with its volume, represented by the "energy product" (BH) value.
Key points about magnetic energy in a permanent magnet:
Not readily usable:
While a magnet stores energy, it cannot directly provide usable energy like a battery because the energy is primarily potential and only becomes active when a ferromagnetic material is brought into its magnetic field.
Measured by the B-H curve:
The amount of energy stored in a magnet is typically visualized using the B-H curve, where the area under the curve represents the energy density per unit volume.
Factors affecting energy storage:
Material composition: Different magnet materials have varying energy storage capacities.
Magnet size and shape: Larger magnets with a larger volume can store more magnetic energy.

The Orthodox Science is not going to recognize that a PM stores "direct, usable energy", instead they will use the terms: "conservative, indirect, not readily usable"...energy.
And it is obvious that (as an example) if a Magnet Motor could be shown working, generating usable work force, without any input, but the magnets installed...then that is an OU Machine widely demonstrated.

It is known by all, that by just spinning a magnet around a coil, we can get energy infinitely without the magnet suffering any "wear" or any diminishing of its potential magnetic energy...
Just the "spinning mechanism" (whichever would be, like an ICE for example), is the one that may suffer wear and diminish its performance over time...
As a matter of fact...A simple, single phase, Generator Head (just the 'generator' not including the ICE) is a Machine which is NOT getting any external electrical Input, like from a Battery...so it is a "looped, recycled, electrical energy system"...and all we need to do is to -Mechanically- spin it at the required speed, say 3000 or 3600 RPMs with a certain Torque as required by its loaded Max output...

Ufopolitics

[Classic]

So, if one will use an air core coil able to simulate a permanent magnet, can collect all available energy without diminishing the energy from radiating coil ? What would be that ? Avoiding all secondary (pickup coils) to interact with primary when receive energy.

As long as primary is not drained by its secondaries power consumption will be less than what secondaries can output. And all energy spent is just to maintain the radiating field and not to transmit power.

For this effect one needs to lookup for relation amp-turns and resistance of wires while playing with voltage and duty cycle. Duty cycle being the way to control the current ... for a rotary commutator means distance between the contacts and size of contacts/brushes.

In all electric power generators available to purchase we do not see such a thing where secondaries are simply put in direct interaction with primaries.

This is why I have insisted for long time and saying permanents magnets does have their own energy and an electro-magnet have the option to be switched off/on at will.
When we pulse a coil we spend much less energy than keeping energised all time.

Now, if anyone can tell me, I would like to know if I can switch off a big permanent magnet by placing a small and much weak permanent magnet with a gap at one of the ends of the big one with poles seeing each other in opposition ? I only want to temporary block one way of a strong and big permanent magnet. Is it possible ? For a linear longitudinal aligned system lets say ... if I do not intend to use much power. I am referring strict for a switching practical mechanism ... this paragraph is not related to above.

[Classic]

Oh, I forgot to mention that for full assessment of energy stored in a permanent magnet we need to use both sides of the magnet at least because any permanent magnet can and will attract with each pole any ferrous material. So, if a permanent magnet is rated for its strength as 20 kg force lets say, this magnet can and will attract on both sides (both poles) 20 kg force and total energy must be accounted accordingly.

If Force equals Mass (20 kg) times acceleration squared where acceleration is a constant for a gravitational system 9.8 m/s or for an electric charge speed of light one can easily calculate energy available for any period of time if we assume a definite period of time this permanent magnet will be able to maintain its strength for the sake of calculus/demonstration. And this is a constant continuous output without any aparent source of power according to mainstream science.
Than if we consider any losses in such a system where total output power MUST match the input power all scientists from mainstream science will get a continuous head of a great magnitude trying to demonstrate there is not any input energy and such energy do not exist despite anyone can play with a permanent magnet with their hands.

And this example use only one permanent magnet, but this will easy go crazy if we try a system using 2 magnets in attraction or repulsion and further introduce a ferrous material in equation.

For the moment I just stick with kinetic system for easy understanding and testing. Be sure I can go further but, people will have a really hard time if this first stage is not understood and all the lies unveiled.

Bear in mind that this "non existent" power or cvasi power or however mainstream call it, produce real effect which every one of us benefit in every single fraction of time of our life. And for the moment I only speak about energy present in any permanent magnet without naming the origin of this energy.

Anyone talking bs only needs to be shown a permanent magnet and their lies will be exposed. And the beauty is even a child can do it without any high order knowledge.

Oh, in findings of AI there is a lot of lies: this energy is ready to be used at any time, just use and ferrous material or another magnet. Second: the product of BH is not energy stored ! It is the power strength ! It seems that AI is going dumb confusing power measurement with energy measurement.

[rakarskiy]

I have long had many questions about magnetism and electricity. But I still have many questions. Regarding the generation of electricity, I have already reached an understanding that I share with everyone who wants it. But illusions are still fueled by upbringing, it is important to overcome them. As one Jew told me, you can't do this, everyone deserves what they can achieve with their understanding. Therefore, I have no desire to discuss this topic further. 

A couple of days ago, a friend contacted me because he wants to make a generator that was made in Germany ( https://youtu.be/ ), and another guy from Ukraine made it in his garage. My friend contacted the guy who created the device in Ukraine, but the guy has problems with the operation of his creation. The fact that he demonstrates a self-propelled car without a battery on the video does not mean that everything in his scheme is calculated correctly. There are nodes that overheat and fail. There is a short-frequency self-propelled, but there is a lack of engineering knowledge and skills. His first mistake is most likely an incorrectly calculated generation scheme, the conversion from pulsed to direct current. This process must be controlled, based on the fact that electromagnetic induction in a conductor belongs to the type that in electrical engineering is called a "current generator". This design works, but you should not expect cosmic overunit indicators from it.

My publication is about this type of generator.  Video of a guy from Ukraine is attached to the publication.


I have another friend who is an ardent supporter of the fact that magnetic lines cut the conductor in generators. He made the installation with mechanical switching, a statically installed armature of a direct current motor in the stator of a three-phase motor, where he received generation. He made an electronic switch for the same design, and received a transformation on the same installation. I explained to him how excitation for a generator differs from excitation for a transformer, and why it is so necessary to have a constant magnetic flux with a permanent electromagnet.

In the publication where there are photos of the UFO and My Friend installations, everything is published. It is the accounting of the focus of the closed magnetic flux that is key. Whether you believe or not in electromagnetic induction when changing the Anapole moment, it does not matter, just do it that way and that's it.

Electromagnetic generator, without rotation of the magnetic rotor in self-propelled mode. | Patreon   

-----------------------------------
P.S.

I wish everyone to achieve their goals. I always follow what my physics teacher at school said: "if a concept has exceptions and contradictions, it is false." There are too many contradictions in the concept of modern education about inducing EMF in generators, which is why I was looking for answers. Whether I am right or wrong is no longer important, this is my point of view on these issues. One thing is good: physicists cannot refute my conclusions, which means that my concept is as tenacious as the one accepted for education with a bunch of mutually exclusive provisions.

Excitation is the creation of a magnetic excitation field. And the magnetic field induces an EMF. It is clearly stated that excitation for a turbogenerator is 3% of the output power of generation. It is easy to calculate the efficiency, which is 3333%. And the drive of a steam turbine is the condition for the rotation of the excitation electromagnet in the stator of a turbogenerator. We ensure the rotation of the excitation field in the stator without mechanical rotation, we obtain direct efficiency.




 

[Ufopolitics]

So, if one will use an air core coil able to simulate a permanent magnet, can collect all available energy without diminishing the energy from radiating coil ? What would be that ?

That would be a "Tesla Coil"...

A Tesla Coil is an Air Core Device...however, the primary is very flat, and located at the bottom of Secondary "tower"...and made of thick wire and just a few turns.

Avoiding all secondary (pickup coils) to interact with primary when receive energy.

Exactly, once you get the Primary to be in Resonance within its circuit, consisting of a Capacitor and a Spark Gap...then this Primary, wound with coarse (thick) wire gauge and only a few turns, will generate a huge magnetic field which will climb all the way on the secondary top Toroid or "Corona"...

As long as primary is not drained by its secondaries power consumption will be less than what secondaries can output. And all energy spent is just to maintain the radiating field and not to transmit power.

A Tesla Coil Secondary will output thousands of Volts...while Primary keeps "re using" the Input (much lower voltage) based on a full resonance in a closed circuit connected to its transformer secondary, while the transformer input is constant AC...

For this effect one needs to lookup for relation amp-turns and resistance of wires while playing with voltage and duty cycle. Duty cycle being the way to control the current ... for a rotary commutator means distance between the contacts and size of contacts/brushes.

Mainly looking for the correct resonant point within the primary circuit.

In all electric power generators available to purchase we do not see such a thing where secondaries are simply put in direct interaction with primaries.

Wrong, ALL Generators available to purchase, the secondaries are in very direct relation with primaries (exciters).
The thing is that ONLY when you close the circuit of secondary (by loading it), is when is created a secondary magnetic field...and this is how starts the "required torque" to be able to keep rotation constant (3000-3600 RPMs) because BOTH Fields (Primary and Secondary) are facing each other's and Lenz Law comes in...

This is why I have insisted for long time and saying permanents magnets does have their own energy and an electro-magnet have the option to be switched off/on at will....
When we pulse a coil we spend much less energy than keeping energised all time.

Only problem by pulsing coils on the exciting circuit of a generator, is that whenever coil is OFF (on the Frequency Cycle), it reverses its Voltage as also its Magnetic Field...and this "natural behavior" disrupts Output Induction on the Secondary(ies)...
The way Generators that we know, works...as that we can purchase everywhere...uses a DC Constant and Steady Exciting (Inducing) Magnetic Field...not pulsed.

Now, if anyone can tell me, I would like to know if I can switch off a big permanent magnet by placing a small and much weak permanent magnet with a gap at one of the ends of the big one with poles seeing each other in opposition ? I only want to temporary block one way of a strong and big permanent magnet. Is it possible ? For a linear longitudinal aligned system lets say ... if I do not intend to use much power. I am referring strict for a switching practical mechanism ... this paragraph is not related to above.

Nope, you cannot do that...in order to "Neutralize" (never can "turn off" any big permanent magnet just like that, or even a small magnet, just like a "switch".
So, in order to "Neutralize" any magnet...you need exactly EQUAL FORCES FROM BOTH Magnets, or as close as possible, then adjust the Air Gap, to just make the final and minimal adjustments...however, I am referring to "Mechanical Neutralization of Forces"...and as an example I can refer to Lüling Magnet Motor...

Ufopolitics