Electromagnetic Generator Theory

[Classic]

@rakarskiy , how do you account for the energy stored in a permanent magnet ? I am not aware of any study anywhere in the world for this.

I am aware that no dedicated scientist will be happy to calculate the input, but at least continuous output can be calculated/estimated pretty easy as continuous displacement force per time the magnet can maintain such displacement force in kinetic system.

In order to calculate the input one must admit the energy is already there to be able to determine the quantity ... and it doesn't seem there is any scientist or entity happy to perform such calculus.
But, once the output is calculated we can use conservation energy law to verify the accuracy of input estimate/calculus if the law hold true, or draw conclusions accordingly.

If someone dare to say the energy is not already there will contradict the other law which says energy can not be created or destroyed.

If I want to be more reckless I can say an electret is doing the same work, where a permanent magnet works with mass and electret works with acceleration as per Newton Law where Force equal Mass times Acceleration squared or according to Einstein, Energy equals Mass times Speed of Light square, where speed of light is considered a constant.

Pretty simple. And is not any paradox, is just accepting the truth which always shout out loud in our face !

[kloakez]

@rakarskiy Well in this line of reasoning, you might find out that MEG exists where they didn't have to wait until the remanent magnetism dissipated, but could make the magnetic flux go another way using as small impulses as possible. And with switching two legs they could switch the magnetic flux ~10k times per second from one leg to the other. That seemed to work, but even after 20 years of development (if I remember well) was never perfected enough to be scalable.

[Electro]

Electromagnetism is a fascinating subject with many mysteries and paradoxes that is still being debated today.

The cutting of magnetic flux gives rise to induction, as does the linking of flux lines. Sometimes BOTH of these actions can be attributed to our induced Faraday currents.

The Faraday Paradox is still being studied and debated everywhere in science, even today, as it is here on this forum.  When you have it nailed down, be sure to pass it along for everyone else to study. 

[Ufopolitics]

Hello UFO!
I am definitely not going to prove anything to anyone, convince or dissuade anyone. The question is why? I have given enough information!

@rakarskiy:

I am not saying "to prove anyone"...BUT to build yourself a setup, which demonstrate all your claims hold true beyond any doubt.

Every single top exponential Scientist in our History, whenever exposing a "claim" they all have BUILT their own setups in order to PROVE his Claims are true as hold true to all testing.

Sometimes these Inventors, Scientists, Researchers needed to contract other people capable of building their prototypes...as many build them themselves.

Like Faraday..."The Father of Magnetism" build his own setups just to demonstrate and prove his Theories hold true...

However, the choice is all yours, but again, BUILDING A REAL MODEL IS THE ONLY WAY that you will prove beyond any doubts that all your claims are true.

Ufopolitics

[Ufopolitics]

Best example how to generate electric curent without without "cutting" wires with a magnetic flux is a Faraday Disc. Where electric charges existing in the conductive metal are placed in a magnetic field (which simply enhance their mass) and spinning the disc simply throw away these particles of electric energy by inertia (so called centrifuge force).

It is quite obvious why in such arrangement a greater current is obtained as voltage depends on the radius which is usually small for practical applications.
Depending on metal used for disc results can be very different. For example if instead of copper disc is used a disc made of silver (aluminium and/or magnesium) alloy, thickness of disc dictate current and radius dictate voltage.

In RakarskiY model above if we replace coils with discs, magnet static and rotate the discs in the same direction, each disc will have opposite sign and no cutting of magnetic flux is required.

Hello Classic,

The Faraday Disc is simply a "huge, one turn closed coil", look at it this way...then you will understand this model.

The Voltage is not high, simply because there is only "one turn" on this "Coil-Disk", however, the thickness of the disk dictates the currents, like on a generator secondary it is dictated based on the wire gauge...[color=var(--body-txt-color)]However, it also depends on the Field Strength for all these parameters to generate more.[/color]

[color=var(--body-txt-color)]As they say that "Radius" of Disk is what increases voltage, yes that is right, however it is a bit more complex than just a radius situation...[/color]

[color=var(--body-txt-color)]When we set the collecting brushes, one at center of disk as the other one on the outer ending surface of disk, we are creating a "changing conducting radial path" that is like a "virtual conductor" within the disk entire mass... as this changing radial conductor CUTS the lines of force from magnetic field...[/color]

I highly recommend that you also read about the work and research done by Bruce De Palma on the "N-Machine"...Please go to the ORIGINAL SITE, because there are many sites that are full of their own opinions...

https://brucedepalma.com/

Also Rex Research shows this machine: http://www.rexresearch.com/depalma/depalma.htm

Ufopolitics