Open Source Free Energy & Over Unity Forums...and If You think none of these terms are real, they do not exist, or is just fiction, then PLEASE>>DO NOT ENTER!!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change-Free Energy will give us hope,
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Words from Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin of Overunity Forum
I really love those words from Stefan, reason why they are here..
Overunity.com Forum is online at Overunity.com Archives

Ufopolitics Figuera's Linear Pump Discussion/Questions

Started by Ufopolitics, Oct 04, 2024, 07:26 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

forest and 16 Guests are viewing this topic.

citfta

I already posted on my topic info regarding "reactive power". When voltage collapse excessive curent start to flow demanding even more current from source (generator coil) and system will shut down or overheat ! It is quite clear that in this point the voltage must be sustained, not the current. Solution is to inject reactive power with voltage leading back into generating coils using a shunt reactor (almost ordinary oscillator) if you look at the picture showing such shunt reactor on the page with link provided.

The part above that I just copied is total nonsense.  You keep bringing up stuff that has nothing to do with what UFO and Kampen are working on.  Please either find another hobby or spend the time to actually learn about electronics before trying to tell others they don't know they are doing.  You've already admitted electronics is not your strong point so please stop trying to tell others they are wrong.  I suspect you have gotten your education from YouTube videos.  That is the worst possible way to learn anything.  If you are serious about wanting to learn electronics then I suggest you find some real books and start studying.  A real good place to start is with a ARRL Handbook.  That is a book for amateur radio operators to use to learn electronics.  You can find older copies on eBay pretty cheap.  Even one 10 years old will have all the basics you need to learn to really understand electronics.

Respectfully,
Carroll
Just because it is on YouTube does NOT make it real!

citfta

  "Once that we close the circuit at output by adding a load, there is a Secondary Magnetic Field generated instantly, and that field is completely Static/Fixed to steel core and opposed (Lenz) -in polarity- to the exciting/induced field, creating a strong attraction, this reaction will generate a slow down tendency on any moving field, no matter if it is physical or virtual."

HI Ufo,  I am sorry but I have to disagree with a small part of your statement I copied above.  I highlighted in red the part I disagree with.  As you correctly stated in a IC engine powered generator the load will decrease the engine speed if the governor did not adjust for the extra load.  This of course as you said is because of increased Lenz effect causing added load to the engine.  

However I don't know of any mechanism that would cause a virtual rotating field to slow down with increased load.  The speed of the rotating field or frequency is only determined by the drive mechanism.  In the case of your new design the brushes will be rotating at a speed determined by the motor driving the brushes.  That is all that will determine the speed of the rotating field.  The brushes are NOT going to slow down because of an increase in load.

The only thing that I think will happen is that as you draw more current from the secondary the current in the primary will go up.  But the speed of the brushes will remain the same.

I have read your comments about raising the frequency to increase the output.  And that is true up to a point.  If you recall the video that I posted somewhere on this forum I showed that if you go too high in frequency the output will drop off because of the inductive reactance.

Respectfully, your friend,
Carroll
Just because it is on YouTube does NOT make it real!

Ufopolitics

Quote from: citfta on Today at 06:57 AM"Once that we close the circuit at output by adding a load, there is a Secondary Magnetic Field generated instantly, and that field is completely Static/Fixed to steel core and opposed (Lenz) -in polarity- to the exciting/induced field, creating a strong attraction, this reaction will generate a slow down tendency on any moving field, no matter if it is physical or virtual."

HI Ufo,  I am sorry but I have to disagree with a small part of your statement I copied above.  I highlighted in red the part I disagree with.  As you correctly stated in a IC engine powered generator the load will decrease the engine speed if the governor did not adjust for the extra load.  This of course as you said is because of increased Lenz effect causing added load to the engine. 

However I don't know of any mechanism that would cause a virtual rotating field to slow down with increased load.  The speed of the rotating field or frequency is only determined by the drive mechanism.  In the case of your new design the brushes will be rotating at a speed determined by the motor driving the brushes.  That is all that will determine the speed of the rotating field.  The brushes are NOT going to slow down because of an increase in load.

The only thing that I think will happen is that as you draw more current from the secondary the current in the primary will go up.  But the speed of the brushes will remain the same.

I have read your comments about raising the frequency to increase the output.  And that is true up to a point.  If you recall the video that I posted somewhere on this forum I showed that if you go too high in frequency the output will drop off because of the inductive reactance.

Respectfully, your friend,
Carroll

Hello dear friend @citfta,

We are dealing here with a device we know very little about (moving virtual magnetic fields to generate power)
Then we tend to apply our gained knowledge that is based on the behavior about moving the Magnetic Field along with all components involved on its generation.
From that point of view you are completely correct.

However, whenever we generate a Magnetic Field from any powered coil, we all understand that the Space Properties surrounding this coil change.
This 3D Spatial Volume has the ability to Interact Remotely with other Magnetic Fields nearby without the need to reach the Physical Mass Volume of the two Coils.
We can observe and feel this with Permanent Magnets...for example, we feel the repulsion whenever approximating two equal poles without touching the magnets physically.

And here I will go to my specific setup based on the above explanation.
On my Linear-Series Setup, I have an Inducing Field that is moving and generating a Secondary Field on the Output Main Coil once it gets loaded, which goes from one extreme to the other of steel core, comprehending ALL the Sequential Coils travel path.

This Loaded Output Main Coil Magnetic Field is Static, fixed to its Coil Length and width, BUT, expanding through the Spatial Volume away from the physical coil, which also coincides with the Virtual Moving Field Path.

So, -in my view- I see these Two Fields occupying the same Spatial Volume, where one is moving while the secondary is Static, and I consider that the stronger the secondary field gets (due to high demand loads) this makes the Spatial Volume harder for the moving field to 'advance/thrive', considering that BOTH Fields are Opposed based on Lenz Law, this creates a powerful attraction between the Two Fields.

I know the Driver in charge to move the Inducing Field remotely, only based on wiring connections can accelerate anytime we command it to go  faster, BUT, the Opposition to those commands I know is there due to the Attraction between both fields.

I have driven many setups (not only linear, but also rotary devices based on Virtual Field manipulation) and what you feel is that while you are trying to accelerate your Mechanic Commutator 'suddenly' "ran away" reaching a very high speed, but, the Output drops completely.

I have learned over all this phenomena, that this increase must be done VERY slowly, not to get this "ran away" feeling which I consider is a separation from driver commands and the Virtual Moving Field.

I picture this operation of driving of a Virtual Field as a "rubber band" connection between Virtual Field and Remote Driver.

And so, whenever the two fields (Static and Moving Fields) are under extreme attraction your rubber band starts to stretch and stretch...and if you keep pulling this rubber band, there is point that it literally brakes...then my motor went on a "ran away"...

I have felt this effect so many times...and this is the explanation I find so far to describe it.

Again, we are on "unknown territory" here...and only real testing will get us more knowledge.

As you've mentioned above, this could also be due to the Inductive Reactance, whenever I am pushing too far exceeding the normal operating frequency or driving faster than can be done.

Now, a similar 'feeling' like I am describing above takes place when brushes "fly away" from contacting the commutator surface...however, the noise pitch is different, as sparks are no longer at commutator when brushes lose contact.

Anyways, I really hope that you are totally right, as nothing would be able to stop the moving field...in that case we have a winner here.

Regards my friend

Ufopolitics

 
Principles for the Development of a Complete Mind:Study the science of art. Study the art of science.
Develop your senses- especially learn how to see. Realize that everything connects to everything else.
―Leonardo da Vinci

Ufopolitics

Hello again @citfta,

Now with this new driver, where the brushes are assisted by Centrifugal Forces, the possibility of brushes separating from commutator surface is remotely possible.
Plus, the 32 Commutator Segments will offer the possibility of driving at lower speeds.

Which only leaves two options for this "ran away" effect to take place, under heavy loading-if it does occur- then we can blame either one, when accelerating beyond established boundaries.

1- Inductive Reactance.
2- My "rubber band" theory.

Anyways, like I wrote before...only Real Bench Testing will return the right answers.

Regards dear friend

Ufopolitics

Principles for the Development of a Complete Mind:Study the science of art. Study the art of science.
Develop your senses- especially learn how to see. Realize that everything connects to everything else.
―Leonardo da Vinci


Open Source Free Energy-Over Unity Systems Research/Development/Disclosure/Discussions