Ufopolitics Figuera's Linear Pump Discussion/Questions

[Prajna]

Hello All,

I would like to bring here, for further discussion an interesting analysis that member @Prajna post on his Topic (link to his website)

...

Even though there are a couple of drawbacks on his approach on operating function, the MOST we can get from it, is the DIFFERENT and RADICAL STRUCTURE and Magnetic Field LINEAR DISPLACEMENT.

From there, we can add INFINITE different approaches and possibilities, always using the FIGUERA'S LINEAR CONCEPT.

Regards

Ufopolitics

Thanks, @UfoPolitics, and you are right, that paragraph is wrong. I'll rewrite it to better reflect what the patent indicates.

And thanks for taking the time to look at my page.

[Prajna]

Hi @UfoPolitics, just to update you: I edited that paragraph so it now says, "I believe the principle that Figuera relies on for his device is that he rotates his magnetic field (in fact, as noted above, Figuera doesn't rotate his field as is done in a conventional generator, rather he reciprocates it, making one pole stronger and then the other) with negligible effort, since it is merely a case of rotating the brush, and any field induced in the Output coil has nothing for the Lenz force to act on."

I hope that is clearer.

[Ufopolitics]

Hello All,

Great, thanks, so, here it is:

Discussion about the Lockridge Device

I have moved all post related to the Lockridge Topic above.

Later on, I will clean this Topic.

Thanks again for understanding.

Ufopolitics

[Ufopolitics]

Hi @UfoPolitics, just to update you: I edited that paragraph so it now says, "I believe the principle that Figuera relies on for his device is that he rotates his magnetic field (in fact, as noted above, Figuera doesn't rotate his field as is done in a conventional generator, rather he reciprocates it, making one pole stronger and then the other) with negligible effort, since it is merely a case of rotating the brush, and any field induced in the Output coil has nothing for the Lenz force to act on."

I hope that is clearer.

@Prajna 

Great Thanks!

Prior you have made an offer to build a 3D Animation of your 3D CAD Graphic that I have shown on the first page...can you do it whenever you get a chance, please?

As it will help alot to understand the basic Field Movements or Expanding-Contracting of the two components N & S.

Regards

Ufopolitics

[Ufopolitics]

LINEAR VERSUS ROTARY ELECTROMAGNETIC INDUCTION METHODS (PART 1)

Hello All,

Ok, about the Linear Versus Rotary...the basic details.

I want to make sure you understand perfectly well these two terms in the same level that I have full domain to then apply them in all your future designs.
Therefore, on the following posts, I want to establish the radical differences between the two Induction Methods.

On the Rotary part...

On the image above I have a typical rotary generator, two poles on the exciter rotor, represented by the Rectangle having the two poles N & S, as I have set all coils on the Stator right next to each other's, not overlapped, plainly set for the sake of simplicity...

The Exciter Rotor spins at 3600 RPM's, and each Coil spreads exactly 60º, so we have a total of Six (6) Coils, which are connected in series, that closes the circumference to the full 360º.

I have also set a black rectangle enclosing the N Pole and one coil, where Field is perfectly centered-aligned to this coil, and that I have a RED arrow showing the word "View"...which means next image will set us as looking from that Viewpoint.

And the Graphic below shows ON THE LEFT IMAGE, that specific Viewpoint:

On image above I have BOTH METHODS together:

1- On LEFT IMAGE is just a Section of the Rotational Type Electromagnetic Induction.

2- On the RIGHT IMAGE, I am showing the Figuera Linear Electromagnetic Induction.

As one of the main differences that we can see at plain sight, are written for each Drawing:

1- On the Rotary Induction, the North Pole B-Field is PERPENDICULAR to the FIELD DISPLACEMENT.

2- On the Linear Induction, the North B-Field is PARALLEL to the FIELD DISPLACEMENT.

On the Rotary Induction, due to the Field Displacement being Perpendicular to Field Pole Projection (B-Field) this attribute generates an Electron Spin on ONLY the Coil wires that are VERTICALLY running on the Square Steel Core. (As Maxwell stated on his books)
Normally, this specific generation developing only on the Vertical Conductors, has been attributed to the "Imaginary Lines of Force" CUTTING ONLY the Vertical conductors, while all Horizontal wires in the Coil serve as "conductors" of the EMF Generated.

On Image above I have Highlighted ALL VERTICAL WIRE SEGMENTS IN RED on the Induced Coil, as the only sections of the wires which generate an EMF, all the rest of wires only serve as conductors, as adding Resistance to the Circuit.
Note: I did not add all the "Imaginary Lines of Force" to this graphic not to create a lot of confusing lines, however, these lines of force run parallel to B-Field Vector and all around the front spatial part of the Magnetic Field.

So, I guess the Horizontal wires do not get to be "cut" by the Imaginary Lines of Force, since they are parallel to the Field Displacement, not perpendicular like all the Vertical ones.

And here, I do not want to enter into specific details on Both Theories -at this point- about if it is Maxwell or Faraday Theories which is right or wrong, AS BOTH THEORIES SATISFY REALITY, this is a fact, meaning in reality, this is how ALL rotary generators electromagnetic induction takes place.

But basically, this is a HUGE disadvantage that Rotary Induction Systems brings along, that only HALF (OR A PORTION THEREOF) OF ALL THE INDUCED COILS are the ones that actually generates EMF, while all other conductors just add Resistance to the Induction Circuit.

If you all have noticed, ALL Rotary Generators Stator-Induced Coils have the upper and lower coil wires BENT AWAY from the AIR GAP where majority of Field Force is taking place...As also you may have noticed that large outputting generators are more ELONGATED VERTICALLY than lower output ones...this is done to have Vertical wires taking more space than horizontal wires. And, of course, also the Exciter Rotor must be Elongated as well.

So far, I have dedicated this post to the explanation of the Rotary Method...and I am still not finished with rotary.

Regards

Ufopolitics